Helios vs Sana
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Helios | Sana |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Repository | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 46/100 | 49/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 16 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates minute-scale videos (up to 60+ seconds) from natural language text prompts using a 14B-parameter diffusion model with autoregressive, chunk-based frame generation. The model processes video in 33-frame chunks sequentially, with each chunk conditioned on previous chunks to maintain temporal coherence without explicit anti-drifting mechanisms like self-forcing or error-banks. Achieves 19.5 FPS on a single H100 GPU by leveraging unified history injection and multi-term memory patchification during training.
Unique: Achieves minute-scale video generation without conventional anti-drifting strategies (self-forcing, error-banks, keyframe sampling) by using unified history injection and multi-term memory patchification during training, enabling simpler inference pipelines and faster generation on single-GPU setups.
vs alternatives: Faster than Runway ML or Pika Labs for long-form generation (19.5 FPS on H100) because it avoids expensive anti-drifting mechanisms through training-time optimizations rather than inference-time corrections.
Generates videos conditioned on a static input image, using the image as a visual anchor to guide the diffusion process. The model encodes the input image through the same VAE and transformer backbone used for text conditioning, allowing the image to provide spatial and semantic constraints that shape frame generation across all 33-frame chunks. Supports both Helios-Base (highest quality) and Helios-Distilled (fastest) variants with identical architectural conditioning.
Unique: Uses unified VAE and transformer conditioning pathway for both text and image inputs, enabling seamless switching between T2V and I2V tasks without separate conditioning modules or architectural branching.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Runway's image-to-video because it supports the same three model variants (Base/Mid/Distilled) for I2V as T2V, allowing quality-speed tradeoffs that competitors don't expose.
Training mechanism that injects previous chunk history (encoded representations of prior 33-frame chunks) directly into the transformer attention layers, enabling the model to maintain temporal coherence across chunk boundaries without explicit anti-drifting strategies like self-forcing, error-banks, or keyframe sampling. The history is injected as additional context tokens in the attention mechanism, allowing the model to learn implicit drift prevention during training. This approach simplifies inference (no need for complex anti-drifting logic) while maintaining quality across minute-scale videos.
Unique: Injects previous chunk history as additional context tokens in transformer attention rather than using separate anti-drifting modules, enabling implicit drift prevention learned during training rather than explicit inference-time corrections.
vs alternatives: Simpler than self-forcing or error-bank approaches because it requires no inference-time logic — drift prevention is entirely baked into model weights, reducing inference complexity and latency.
Training-time technique that applies lightweight anti-drifting constraints during the Base model training stage, preventing motion drift without the computational overhead of inference-time anti-drifting mechanisms. The strategy uses multi-term memory patchification to reference multiple previous chunks, enabling the model to learn motion consistency across longer temporal windows. This is distinct from unified history injection — easy anti-drifting focuses on motion stability through explicit training objectives, while history injection provides implicit temporal context.
Unique: Applies anti-drifting constraints during training rather than inference, enabling lightweight motion stability improvements without the computational cost of inference-time mechanisms like self-forcing or error-banks.
vs alternatives: More efficient than inference-time anti-drifting because it bakes motion stability into model weights during training, avoiding the need for dual-pass inference or complex post-processing logic.
Two custom noise schedulers optimized for different prediction types and guidance strategies: HeliosScheduler for Base/Mid variants (v-prediction with standard/CFG-Zero guidance) and HeliosDMDScheduler for Distilled variant (x0-prediction with CFG-free guidance). Each scheduler is jointly optimized with its corresponding prediction type and guidance strategy during training, enabling faster convergence and better quality at fewer inference steps. The schedulers define the noise level progression across diffusion steps, with HeliosDMDScheduler using more aggressive noise reduction for x0-prediction.
Unique: Variant-specific schedulers (HeliosScheduler vs. HeliosDMDScheduler) are jointly optimized with prediction type and guidance strategy during training, enabling architectural adaptation rather than using a single universal scheduler.
vs alternatives: More efficient than fixed schedulers (e.g., linear, cosine) because each scheduler is co-trained with its prediction type and guidance strategy, enabling faster convergence and better quality at fewer steps.
Generates new video frames conditioned on an input video sequence, enabling style transfer, motion continuation, or video interpolation. The model encodes the input video through temporal convolutions and attention layers, extracting motion and semantic patterns that guide the diffusion process for subsequent frames. Supports frame-by-frame or chunk-by-chunk conditioning depending on the inference interface used.
Unique: Encodes input video through the same temporal transformer backbone used for training, extracting motion patterns without separate optical flow or motion estimation modules, enabling end-to-end differentiable video conditioning.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Deforum or Ebsynth because it doesn't require explicit optical flow computation or keyframe specification — motion is implicitly learned from the input video encoding.
Provides three model checkpoints (Helios-Base, Helios-Mid, Helios-Distilled) arranged in a distillation chain that progressively trades quality for inference speed. Base uses v-prediction with standard CFG and 50 inference steps for highest quality; Mid uses CFG-Zero with 20 steps per stage; Distilled uses x0-prediction with CFG-free guidance (scale=1.0) and 2-3 steps per stage. Each variant uses a different noise scheduler (HeliosScheduler for Base/Mid, HeliosDMDScheduler for Distilled) optimized for its prediction type and guidance strategy.
Unique: Distillation chain uses different prediction types (v-prediction → x0-prediction) and guidance strategies (Standard CFG → CFG-Zero → CFG-free) rather than just reducing model size or step count, enabling architectural adaptation at each stage rather than uniform compression.
vs alternatives: More transparent than Runway or Pika Labs because it exposes three distinct checkpoints with documented quality-speed tradeoffs, allowing developers to make informed variant selection rather than being locked into a single model.
Helios-Mid and Helios-Distilled variants employ a multi-scale sampling pipeline that decomposes the diffusion process into multiple stages, each operating at different noise scales. The Pyramid Unified Predictor (PUP) architecture enables efficient coarse-to-fine generation where early stages produce low-frequency motion and semantic structure, and later stages refine high-frequency details. This approach reduces effective inference steps (20 per stage for Mid, 2-3 per stage for Distilled) while maintaining temporal coherence across chunk boundaries.
Unique: Pyramid Unified Predictor enables stage-specific prediction types and schedulers (v-prediction in early stages, x0-prediction in later stages) rather than uniform prediction across all diffusion steps, allowing architectural adaptation to noise scale.
vs alternatives: More efficient than standard multi-step diffusion because it uses a unified predictor across stages rather than separate models, reducing memory overhead while maintaining quality through hierarchical decomposition.
+5 more capabilities
Generates high-resolution images (up to 4K) from text prompts using SanaTransformer2DModel, a Linear DiT architecture that implements O(N) complexity attention instead of standard quadratic attention. The pipeline encodes text via Gemma-2-2B, processes latents through linear transformer blocks, and decodes via DC-AE (32× compression). This linear attention mechanism enables efficient processing of high-resolution spatial latents without the memory quadratic scaling of standard transformers.
Unique: Implements O(N) linear attention in diffusion transformers via SanaTransformer2DModel instead of standard quadratic self-attention, combined with 32× compression DC-AE autoencoder (vs 8× in Stable Diffusion), enabling 4K generation with significantly lower memory footprint than comparable models like SDXL or Flux
vs alternatives: Achieves 2-4× faster inference and 40-50% lower VRAM usage than Stable Diffusion XL while maintaining comparable image quality through linear attention and aggressive latent compression
Generates images in a single neural network forward pass using SANA-Sprint, a distilled variant of the base SANA model trained via knowledge distillation and reinforcement learning. The model compresses multi-step diffusion sampling into one step by learning to directly predict high-quality outputs from noise, eliminating iterative denoising loops. This is implemented through specialized training objectives that match the output distribution of multi-step teachers.
Unique: Combines knowledge distillation with reinforcement learning to train one-step diffusion models that match multi-step teacher outputs, implemented as dedicated SANA-Sprint model variants (1B and 600M parameters) rather than post-hoc quantization or pruning
vs alternatives: Achieves single-step generation with quality comparable to 4-8 step multi-step models, whereas alternatives like LCM or progressive distillation typically require 2-4 steps for acceptable quality
Sana scores higher at 49/100 vs Helios at 46/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Integrates SANA models into ComfyUI's node-based workflow system, enabling visual composition of generation pipelines without code. Custom nodes wrap SANA inference, ControlNet, and sampling operations as draggable nodes that can be connected to build complex workflows. Integration handles model loading, VRAM management, and batch processing through ComfyUI's execution engine.
Unique: Implements SANA as native ComfyUI nodes that integrate with ComfyUI's execution engine and VRAM management, enabling visual composition of generation workflows without requiring Python knowledge
vs alternatives: Provides visual workflow builder interface for SANA compared to command-line or Python API, lowering barrier to entry for non-technical users while maintaining composability with other ComfyUI nodes
Provides Gradio-based web interfaces for interactive image and video generation with real-time parameter adjustment. Demos include sliders for guidance scale, seed, resolution, and other hyperparameters, with live preview of outputs. The framework includes pre-built demo scripts that can be deployed as standalone web apps or embedded in larger applications.
Unique: Provides pre-built Gradio demo scripts that wrap SANA inference with interactive parameter controls, deployable to HuggingFace Spaces or standalone servers without custom web development
vs alternatives: Enables rapid deployment of interactive demos with minimal code compared to building custom web interfaces, with automatic parameter validation and real-time preview
Implements quantization strategies (INT8, FP8, NVFp4) to reduce model size and inference latency for deployment. The framework supports post-training quantization via PyTorch quantization APIs and custom quantization kernels optimized for SANA's linear attention. Quantized models maintain quality while reducing VRAM by 50-75% and accelerating inference by 1.5-3×.
Unique: Implements custom quantization kernels optimized for SANA's linear attention (NVFp4 format), achieving better quality-to-size tradeoffs than generic quantization approaches by exploiting model-specific properties
vs alternatives: Provides model-specific quantization optimized for linear attention vs generic quantization tools, achieving 1.5-3× speedup with minimal quality loss compared to standard INT8 quantization
Integrates with HuggingFace Model Hub for centralized model distribution, versioning, and checkpoint management. Models are published as HuggingFace repositories with automatic configuration, tokenizer, and checkpoint handling. The framework supports model card generation, version control, and seamless loading via HuggingFace transformers/diffusers APIs.
Unique: Integrates SANA models with HuggingFace Hub's standard model card, configuration, and versioning system, enabling one-line loading via transformers/diffusers APIs and automatic documentation generation
vs alternatives: Provides standardized model distribution through HuggingFace Hub vs custom hosting, enabling discovery, versioning, and community contributions through established ecosystem
Provides Docker configurations for containerized SANA deployment with pre-installed dependencies, model checkpoints, and inference servers. Dockerfiles include CUDA runtime, PyTorch, and optimized inference configurations. Containers can be deployed to cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure) or on-premises infrastructure with consistent behavior across environments.
Unique: Provides pre-configured Dockerfiles with CUDA runtime, PyTorch, and SANA dependencies, enabling one-command deployment to cloud platforms without manual dependency installation
vs alternatives: Simplifies deployment compared to manual environment setup, with guaranteed reproducibility across development, staging, and production environments
Implements a hierarchical YAML configuration system for managing training, inference, and model hyperparameters. Configurations support inheritance, variable substitution, and environment-specific overrides. The framework validates configurations against schemas and provides clear error messages for invalid settings. Configs control model architecture, training objectives, sampling strategies, and deployment settings.
Unique: Implements hierarchical YAML configuration with inheritance and validation, enabling complex hyperparameter management without code changes and supporting environment-specific overrides
vs alternatives: Provides structured configuration management vs hardcoded hyperparameters or command-line arguments, enabling reproducible experiments and easy configuration sharing
+8 more capabilities