MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs en_PP-OCRv5_mobile_rec at 39/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | en_PP-OCRv5_mobile_rec | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 39/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 1 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Recognizes text within pre-cropped textline image regions using a lightweight CNN-RNN architecture optimized for mobile deployment. The model processes variable-length textline images through a ResNet backbone for feature extraction, followed by a bidirectional LSTM sequence decoder that outputs character-level predictions. Architecture uses attention mechanisms to handle variable text lengths and orientations, with quantization and pruning applied to reduce model size from ~200MB to ~8-10MB for on-device inference.
Unique: Uses PaddleOCR's proprietary lightweight architecture combining ResNet feature extraction with bidirectional LSTM decoding, specifically tuned for mobile inference via PaddleLite quantization (INT8/FP16). Unlike generic CRNN models, incorporates attention mechanisms for variable-length handling and applies knowledge distillation to reduce parameters by ~60% while maintaining accuracy parity with full models.
vs alternatives: Smaller model footprint (~8-10MB) than Tesseract or EasyOCR with faster mobile inference, and better accuracy on modern fonts than traditional Tesseract; trades off language diversity for English-specific optimization and requires detection model pairing.
Decodes variable-length character sequences from textline feature maps using a bidirectional LSTM with attention mechanism. The decoder attends over spatial feature dimensions to predict characters sequentially, handling text of different lengths (typically 1-50 characters) without fixed-size constraints. Attention weights allow the model to focus on relevant image regions for each predicted character, improving accuracy on compressed or distorted text.
Unique: Implements 2D spatial attention over feature maps rather than 1D sequence attention, allowing the model to attend to specific image regions for each character. This differs from standard seq2seq attention by preserving spatial locality, critical for OCR where character position in the image directly correlates with output position.
vs alternatives: More accurate than fixed-length CTC decoders on variable-length text, and more interpretable than pure RNN baselines; trades computational cost for robustness on diverse text lengths.
Extracts spatial feature representations from textline images using a lightweight ResNet backbone (typically ResNet18 or ResNet34 variant) with depthwise separable convolutions for mobile efficiency. The backbone progressively downsamples spatial dimensions while increasing channel depth, producing feature maps that capture character-level visual patterns (strokes, curves, spacing). Intermediate feature maps are concatenated to preserve multi-scale information critical for recognizing text at different scales and resolutions.
Unique: Uses depthwise separable convolutions throughout the ResNet backbone to reduce parameters by ~70% compared to standard ResNet, while concatenating features from multiple scales (stride 4, 8, 16) to preserve fine-grained character details. This hybrid approach balances mobile efficiency with multi-scale robustness.
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than standard ResNet50 used in EasyOCR, and faster than VGG-based backbones in Tesseract; trades some capacity for mobile deployability.
Deploys the recognition model on mobile devices using INT8 quantization and PaddleLite runtime, reducing model size from ~200MB (FP32) to ~8-10MB (INT8) with minimal accuracy loss (<1%). Quantization is applied post-training using calibration data; the model is converted to PaddleLite format with operator fusion and memory layout optimization for ARM processors. Inference runs directly on mobile CPUs without GPU dependency, achieving 10-50ms latency per textline on modern mobile hardware.
Unique: Applies post-training INT8 quantization with per-channel scaling and operator fusion specifically tuned for PaddleLite's ARM backend, achieving 20x model size reduction while maintaining <1% accuracy loss. Unlike generic quantization frameworks, incorporates PaddleOCR-specific calibration strategies for text recognition workloads.
vs alternatives: Smaller deployment footprint than TensorFlow Lite quantized models, and faster inference than ONNX Runtime on mobile; requires PaddleLite ecosystem lock-in.
Preprocesses variable-width textline images into normalized batches for inference, handling resizing, padding, and channel normalization. Images are resized to fixed height (32 pixels) while preserving aspect ratio, padded to a common width within the batch, and normalized using ImageNet statistics (mean=[0.485, 0.456, 0.406], std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225]). Preprocessing is implemented in C++ for PaddleLite and Python for server inference, with SIMD optimizations for mobile platforms.
Unique: Implements dual preprocessing pipelines: C++ SIMD-optimized path for PaddleLite mobile inference (using NEON on ARM), and Python path for server inference. Preprocessing is fused with model loading to minimize memory copies; padding strategy uses dynamic batch width calculation to minimize wasted computation.
vs alternatives: Faster preprocessing than OpenCV-only pipelines due to SIMD optimization, and more memory-efficient than pre-padding all images to maximum width; requires PaddlePaddle ecosystem integration.
Extracts character-level confidence scores from model output logits and applies post-processing filters to remove low-confidence predictions. The model outputs logits for each character position; softmax is applied to convert to probabilities, and per-character confidence is extracted as the maximum probability. Filtering strategies include: removing characters with confidence <threshold, merging adjacent low-confidence predictions, and flagging uncertain regions for manual review. Confidence scores enable downstream applications to prioritize high-confidence text for processing.
Unique: Provides per-character confidence scores extracted from softmax probabilities, with optional filtering and flagging for manual review. Unlike end-to-end confidence estimation, this approach is model-agnostic and can be applied to any sequence prediction model; confidence calibration is left to the application layer.
vs alternatives: More granular than binary accept/reject decisions, and enables downstream quality control workflows; less reliable than ensemble-based confidence estimation but computationally cheaper.
Designed as the recognition stage of PaddleOCR's two-stage pipeline, consuming textline bounding boxes and cropped images from the detection model (en_PP-OCRv5_mobile_det). The recognition model expects pre-cropped textline images with minimal padding; integration requires coordinate transformation from detection output (rotated bounding boxes) to axis-aligned crops. PaddleOCR provides end-to-end orchestration via the OCRv5 inference API, handling detection→crop→recognition→post-processing in a single call.
Unique: Designed as the recognition component of PaddleOCR's modular two-stage architecture, with built-in coordinate transformation and batch processing optimized for detection output. Unlike standalone recognition models, includes PaddleOCR-specific post-processing (duplicate removal, confidence filtering) and high-level API integration.
vs alternatives: Seamless integration with PaddleOCR ecosystem; requires less custom code than combining independent detection and recognition models; trades flexibility for ease of use.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs en_PP-OCRv5_mobile_rec at 39/100. en_PP-OCRv5_mobile_rec leads on ecosystem, while MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities