| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides standardized Model Context Protocol (MCP) bindings for integrating blockchain wallet authentication into AI assistants without custom API wrappers. Implements MCP server pattern to expose wallet connection, signing, and session management as callable tools that LLMs can invoke directly, abstracting away provider-specific authentication flows (MetaMask, WalletConnect, etc.) behind a unified interface.
Unique: Uses MCP protocol as transport layer for wallet operations, enabling direct LLM tool calling without HTTP middleware, and provides standardized schema definitions for wallet interactions across heterogeneous blockchain providers
vs alternatives: Eliminates custom API wrapper boilerplate compared to direct ethers.js/web3.js integration by leveraging MCP's standardized tool schema and context management
Generates boilerplate smart contract projects and Web3 application structures via MCP tools that LLMs can invoke. Implements template-based code generation with configurable parameters (contract type, blockchain target, dependency versions) and outputs ready-to-deploy project directories with compiled artifacts, test suites, and deployment scripts pre-configured for target networks.
Unique: Exposes contract scaffolding as MCP tools callable by LLMs, enabling multi-turn AI-assisted development where the assistant can generate, modify, and test contracts within a single conversation context without context switching to CLI tools
vs alternatives: Faster iteration than Hardhat/Foundry CLI for exploratory development because LLM maintains conversation context across scaffold → test → modify cycles, vs manual CLI invocations
Provides MCP tools for programmatic creation and lifecycle management of embedded (non-custodial) blockchain wallets within AI applications. Implements key derivation, account abstraction support, and transaction building without exposing private keys to the LLM, using secure enclave patterns or hardware-backed key storage. Enables AI agents to manage user wallets on behalf of applications while maintaining cryptographic security boundaries.
Unique: Implements secure key isolation pattern where private keys are never passed to or visible to the LLM — instead, the MCP server holds keys and LLM invokes signing operations via tool calls, maintaining cryptographic boundaries while enabling wallet automation
vs alternatives: More secure than passing private keys to LLM APIs (e.g., via function calling) because key material stays server-side; more flexible than hardware wallets because supports programmatic batch operations and account abstraction patterns
Constructs and simulates blockchain transactions by querying live on-chain state (balances, allowances, contract state) and building transaction objects that account for current network conditions (gas prices, nonce management). Implements state-aware transaction building where the MCP server fetches required data from blockchain RPC endpoints and constructs transactions that are validated against current state before signing, preventing failed transactions due to stale assumptions.
Unique: Queries live blockchain state during transaction building rather than relying on static assumptions, enabling the LLM to make decisions based on current balances, allowances, and contract state without manual state inspection
vs alternatives: More reliable than LLM-only transaction construction because it validates against actual on-chain state; faster than manual simulation workflows because state queries and building happen in a single MCP tool call
Abstracts blockchain RPC calls across multiple providers (Infura, Alchemy, QuickNode, self-hosted) with automatic failover, load balancing, and provider-specific optimization. Implements a provider registry pattern where the MCP server routes calls to the best available provider based on method support, latency, and rate limit status, and transparently handles provider-specific quirks (response format differences, timeout behavior).
Unique: Implements provider abstraction at the MCP tool level, allowing LLM to invoke generic 'call blockchain' tools without knowing which provider is used, with automatic failover and optimization happening transparently in the server
vs alternatives: More resilient than single-provider setups because failover is automatic; more flexible than client-side load balancing libraries because provider logic is centralized and can be updated without redeploying LLM applications
Translates natural language descriptions of contract interactions into properly formatted function calls with correct parameter types and ABI encoding. Parses contract ABIs, matches natural language intent to contract functions using semantic matching or heuristics, and generates typed function call objects that can be directly executed. Enables LLMs to interact with arbitrary smart contracts without explicit ABI knowledge by bridging the semantic gap between natural language and low-level contract interfaces.
Unique: Bridges semantic gap between natural language and contract ABIs by implementing heuristic-based function matching and parameter inference, allowing LLMs to interact with contracts without explicit function signatures in the prompt
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded function mappings because it works with arbitrary contracts; more accurate than pure LLM-based ABI parsing because it validates against actual contract ABIs
Manages the lifecycle of the Openfort MCP server including initialization, configuration loading, context preservation across tool calls, and graceful shutdown. Implements context management patterns where wallet state, transaction history, and provider connections are maintained across multiple LLM tool invocations within a single conversation, enabling stateful AI workflows without requiring external session storage.
Unique: Implements MCP-native context management where conversation state is preserved across tool calls within a single MCP session, eliminating the need for external session stores for simple workflows
vs alternatives: Simpler than external session stores for single-server deployments because state is managed in-process; requires explicit persistence for distributed deployments vs managed services that handle this automatically
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Openfort at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities