| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides coding agents with a local vector database backend that persists agent interactions, code context, and learned patterns across sessions without requiring external cloud infrastructure. Uses embeddings to store and retrieve contextual information, enabling agents to maintain continuity and reference past decisions without re-processing the same codebase analysis.
Unique: Integrates directly as an OpenCode plugin with local-first vector storage, eliminating external API dependencies and enabling agents to maintain memory without cloud infrastructure, while providing embedding-based semantic retrieval for code context
vs alternatives: Lighter and faster than cloud-based memory solutions (no network latency) while maintaining full privacy, though less scalable than distributed memory systems for multi-agent scenarios
Retrieves semantically similar code snippets and architectural patterns from the agent's memory using vector similarity search, allowing agents to find relevant past solutions without keyword matching. Converts code and documentation into embeddings, then performs nearest-neighbor queries to surface contextually relevant information for code generation tasks.
Unique: Implements semantic search specifically for code context within the OpenCode agent framework, using vector embeddings to match code patterns by meaning rather than syntax, enabling agents to discover relevant past solutions automatically
vs alternatives: More semantically accurate than regex/keyword-based code search, but requires upfront embedding computation and depends on embedding model quality unlike simple text search
Automatically captures and stores agent decisions, code generation choices, and reasoning steps in the vector database, creating a queryable history of what the agent has done and why. Each decision is embedded and indexed, allowing agents to review their own past reasoning patterns and avoid repeating failed approaches.
Unique: Embeds agent decisions as first-class memory objects in the vector database, enabling semantic queries over agent reasoning history and allowing agents to learn from past decision patterns through similarity search
vs alternatives: Richer than simple log files because decisions are semantically queryable; more lightweight than full execution trace systems since it focuses on decision points rather than all intermediate steps
Manages a local vector database instance that stores embeddings, metadata, and retrieval indices without external dependencies. Handles database initialization, embedding storage, index management, and query execution entirely on the developer's machine, with built-in support for persistence across restarts.
Unique: Provides embedded vector database functionality as an OpenCode plugin without requiring external services, using local file-based storage with built-in indexing and query optimization for coding agent memory
vs alternatives: Eliminates network latency and external dependencies compared to cloud vector databases, but sacrifices scalability and multi-instance coordination for simplicity and privacy
Integrates seamlessly with the OpenCode framework as a plugin, exposing memory and retrieval capabilities through OpenCode's standard plugin API. Handles lifecycle management, configuration, and inter-plugin communication, allowing coding agents built on OpenCode to access memory features without custom integration code.
Unique: Implements memory as a first-class OpenCode plugin using the framework's standard plugin architecture, enabling agents to access memory through OpenCode's native context and lifecycle management rather than custom integration
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with OpenCode than external memory libraries, but limited to OpenCode ecosystem unlike standalone vector database solutions
Converts code snippets into vector embeddings and performs similarity matching to find structurally and semantically similar code patterns. Uses embedding models to capture code semantics beyond syntax, enabling agents to identify related code even when written differently, and rank results by relevance score.
Unique: Applies embedding-based similarity matching specifically to code, capturing semantic equivalence beyond syntax and enabling agents to find related solutions even when code structure differs significantly
vs alternatives: More semantically aware than AST-based matching for finding conceptually similar code, but less precise than syntactic analysis for detecting exact duplicates
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs opencode-mem at 30/100. opencode-mem leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities