MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o4 Mini at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: o4 Mini | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption | 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.10e-6 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both text and image inputs through an extended reasoning pipeline that generates intermediate reasoning steps before producing final outputs. The model uses an internal chain-of-thought mechanism similar to o1/o3 architecture but optimized for inference speed and cost, allowing it to handle complex reasoning tasks across modalities without exposing reasoning tokens to the user by default.
Unique: Implements o-series reasoning architecture (extended thinking with internal chain-of-thought) in a compact model optimized for 40-60% lower latency and cost than o1, while maintaining multimodal input support — achieved through selective reasoning depth and optimized token efficiency
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than o1 for reasoning tasks while supporting images; more capable than GPT-4o for complex reasoning but less capable than full o1 on extremely difficult problems
Supports function calling through OpenAI's native tool-use API, accepting JSON schema definitions and returning structured tool calls with arguments. The model can invoke multiple tools in sequence, handle tool results, and adapt behavior based on tool outputs, enabling agentic workflows without requiring prompt engineering for tool invocation.
Unique: Combines o-series reasoning with tool-use, allowing the model to reason about which tools to call and in what sequence before generating tool calls — unlike standard models that generate tool calls reactively, o4-mini reasons about tool strategy first
vs alternatives: More intelligent tool selection than GPT-4o due to reasoning capability; faster and cheaper than o1 for tool-based workflows while maintaining multi-step tool reasoning
Analyzes images through multimodal encoding that processes visual features alongside text, enabling the model to answer questions about image content, describe visual elements, detect objects, read text in images, and reason about spatial relationships. The model applies its reasoning capability to visual analysis, allowing it to draw inferences about what is shown rather than just describing surface-level content.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning to visual analysis, enabling the model to infer context and meaning from images rather than just describing visible elements — similar to how o1 reasons through text, o4-mini reasons through visual content
vs alternatives: More contextual image understanding than GPT-4o due to reasoning; faster and cheaper than o1-vision while maintaining reasoning-based visual analysis
Automatically adjusts the depth of reasoning computation based on query complexity, using lighter reasoning for straightforward questions and deeper reasoning for complex problems. This dynamic approach reduces token consumption and latency for simple queries while maintaining reasoning capability for difficult tasks, implemented through internal heuristics that estimate problem difficulty without exposing reasoning tokens.
Unique: Implements adaptive reasoning depth based on query complexity heuristics, reducing token consumption for simple queries while maintaining o-series reasoning for complex ones — a hybrid approach between standard models and full o1
vs alternatives: 40-60% lower cost than o1 for typical workloads; more cost-predictable than o1 for high-volume applications while maintaining reasoning capability
Generates, debugs, and analyzes code across multiple programming languages using reasoning to understand code structure, dependencies, and logic flow. The model can generate complete functions or modules, suggest refactorings, identify bugs, and explain code behavior by reasoning through execution paths rather than pattern matching.
Unique: Applies reasoning to code generation, enabling the model to reason about correctness, edge cases, and dependencies before generating code — unlike standard models that generate code based on pattern matching, o4-mini reasons through logic
vs alternatives: More correct code generation than GPT-4o for complex algorithms; faster and cheaper than o1 for code tasks while maintaining reasoning-based correctness verification
Supports server-sent events (SSE) streaming to deliver model outputs incrementally as they are generated, enabling real-time display of responses without waiting for full completion. Streaming works with reasoning models by delivering the final response tokens as they are produced, while internal reasoning steps remain hidden.
Unique: Implements streaming for reasoning models by buffering internal reasoning and streaming only the final response, maintaining reasoning benefits while enabling real-time UX — a hybrid approach between full reasoning transparency and streaming responsiveness
vs alternatives: Better UX than non-streaming reasoning models; more transparent than o1 streaming (which hides reasoning) while maintaining reasoning capability
Supports batch API processing where multiple requests are submitted together and processed asynchronously, typically at 50% lower cost than real-time API calls. Batch processing is optimized for non-urgent inference workloads and can process thousands of requests efficiently by optimizing token utilization across the batch.
Unique: Applies batch processing to reasoning models, enabling cost-effective bulk inference for non-urgent workloads while maintaining reasoning capability — batch processing typically unavailable for reasoning models due to complexity
vs alternatives: 50% cost reduction vs real-time API; enables reasoning-based inference at scale for cost-sensitive applications
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: o4 Mini at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities