| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.50e-4 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
o1-pro implements reinforcement learning-trained reasoning that allocates variable compute budgets to internal chain-of-thought processes before generating responses. The model learns to spend more computational tokens on harder problems, using a learned policy to decide when to think longer versus answer directly. This is distinct from prompt-based CoT because the reasoning is learned during training rather than instructed, enabling adaptive complexity handling without explicit prompting.
Unique: Uses reinforcement learning to train adaptive reasoning budgets that scale compute allocation based on problem difficulty, rather than fixed-depth reasoning or prompt-based CoT. The model learns when to allocate more internal tokens without explicit user instruction.
vs alternatives: Outperforms standard LLMs and basic CoT approaches on complex reasoning tasks by learning to allocate compute dynamically, but trades latency and cost for reasoning depth — unlike faster models that prioritize speed.
o1-pro can decompose intricate problems spanning multiple technical domains (mathematics, physics, software engineering, formal logic) and synthesize solutions by reasoning across domain boundaries. The model internally breaks down problems into sub-components, reasons about each, and integrates results — all within the extended reasoning phase. This differs from retrieval-based approaches because reasoning is generative and learned rather than lookup-based.
Unique: Learns to decompose and synthesize across domain boundaries through reinforcement learning, enabling reasoning that spans mathematics, code, and systems thinking without explicit prompting or tool integration.
vs alternatives: Handles cross-domain synthesis better than specialized tools or single-domain models, but lacks the precision of domain-specific solvers and cannot integrate external computation during reasoning.
o1-pro generates and debugs code by reasoning through implementation details, edge cases, and architectural implications before producing output. The extended reasoning phase allows the model to consider multiple implementation approaches, anticipate failure modes, and select optimal solutions. Unlike standard code generation models that produce code directly, o1-pro's reasoning phase enables deeper understanding of requirements and constraints.
Unique: Applies learned reasoning to code generation, enabling the model to reason about correctness, edge cases, and architectural implications before producing code — rather than generating code directly like standard LLMs.
vs alternatives: Produces more correct and architecturally sound code than standard code generation models on complex problems, but is slower and more expensive than real-time code completion tools like Copilot.
o1-pro can generate formal and informal mathematical proofs by reasoning through logical steps, verifying intermediate results, and ensuring soundness of derivations. The extended reasoning phase allows the model to explore proof strategies, backtrack when approaches fail, and synthesize valid proofs. This differs from retrieval-based proof systems because proofs are generated through reasoning rather than looked up from databases.
Unique: Applies reinforcement-learned reasoning to mathematical proof generation, enabling exploration of proof strategies and verification of logical soundness during the thinking phase rather than direct proof generation.
vs alternatives: Generates more creative and varied proofs than retrieval-based systems, but lacks formal verification guarantees and cannot integrate with symbolic math engines for computational verification.
o1-pro is accessed via OpenAI's REST API with support for both streaming responses and batch processing modes. The API abstracts the underlying reasoning infrastructure, exposing a standard chat completion interface with extended reasoning parameters. Streaming allows progressive output delivery, while batch mode enables asynchronous processing of multiple queries with optimized throughput and cost efficiency.
Unique: Provides standardized REST API access to reasoning infrastructure with both streaming and batch modes, abstracting the complexity of managing reasoning compute allocation and token accounting.
vs alternatives: Offers simpler integration than self-hosted reasoning systems, but trades flexibility and cost efficiency for ease of use and managed infrastructure.
o1-pro maintains conversation context across multiple turns, allowing users to build on previous reasoning results and refine solutions iteratively. The model carries forward context from prior exchanges, enabling follow-up questions that reference earlier reasoning without re-explaining the problem. This differs from stateless APIs because the model can reason about relationships between current and previous queries.
Unique: Applies reasoning to multi-turn conversations, enabling the model to reason about relationships between current and prior exchanges rather than treating each query independently.
vs alternatives: Enables more natural iterative reasoning workflows than stateless APIs, but requires explicit context management and incurs full reasoning cost per turn unlike some cached reasoning systems.
o1-pro can generate structured outputs that include confidence levels and uncertainty estimates alongside reasoning results. The model learns to express confidence in its reasoning through the reinforcement learning process, providing signals about solution reliability. This enables downstream applications to make decisions based on reasoning confidence rather than treating all outputs as equally reliable.
Unique: Learns to express confidence in reasoning through reinforcement learning, providing implicit uncertainty signals that correlate with solution reliability without explicit probability quantification.
vs alternatives: Offers confidence signals without additional API calls or ensemble methods, but lacks formal uncertainty quantification and calibration guarantees of Bayesian approaches.
Aggregates 100+ billion deduplicated documents (30 trillion tokens) from 84 CommonCrawl dumps across 5 languages (English, German, French, Spanish, Italian). Each document is pre-annotated with 40+ quality signals including perplexity scores, deduplication hashes, content classifiers, and toxicity ratings computed via a standardized pipeline. The architecture processes raw CommonCrawl HTML through text extraction, deduplication, and multi-dimensional quality scoring, enabling downstream users to apply custom filtering strategies without reprocessing the raw data.
Unique: Processes 84 CommonCrawl dumps (claimed as most complete coverage vs. C4, Refinedweb, Dolma, SlimPajama) with 40+ pre-computed quality annotations per document, enabling fine-grained data curation research without requiring users to reprocess raw CommonCrawl. Open-source processing scripts allow reproducibility and custom filtering strategies on a standardized base dataset.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (30 trillion tokens vs. C4's 156B tokens, RedPajama-1T's 1T tokens) with richer quality annotations (40+ signals vs. minimal metadata in competitors) and multilingual coverage, making it superior for comparative curation research and training diverse language models.
Implements deduplication across 100+ billion documents using hash-based matching to identify and remove duplicate content from CommonCrawl. The pipeline computes deduplication hashes for each document and filters the raw 100+ trillion token corpus down to 30 trillion deduplicated tokens. This approach preserves document boundaries (unlike token-level deduplication) and produces deterministic, reproducible results across reprocessing runs.
Unique: Uses document-level hash-based deduplication (preserving document boundaries) rather than token-level or fuzzy matching, enabling reproducible filtering and transparent deduplication hashes that users can inspect and verify. Processes 84 CommonCrawl dumps with consistent deduplication methodology.
Document-level deduplication is more interpretable and reproducible than token-level approaches, and the published deduplication hashes enable users to understand and verify which documents were removed, unlike proprietary datasets that hide deduplication decisions.
RedPajama v2 scores higher at 59/100 vs OpenAI: o1-pro at 25/100. RedPajama v2 also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Provides the entire 30 trillion token corpus, processing scripts, and quality annotations as free, open-source resources with no licensing restrictions. Users can download, modify, redistribute, and use the data for any purpose including commercial applications. This open approach enables broad research access and community-driven improvements without vendor lock-in.
Unique: Provides complete 30 trillion token corpus with processing scripts as free, open-source resources with no licensing restrictions, whereas competitors (C4, RefinedWeb) may have usage restrictions or require commercial licensing
vs alternatives: Eliminates licensing costs and vendor lock-in through open-source distribution, enabling broad access for academic and commercial use versus competitors with restricted access or licensing requirements
Computes perplexity scores for each document using a reference language model, enabling quantitative assessment of text quality and language model fitness. The perplexity metric measures how well a pre-trained model predicts the document; lower perplexity indicates higher-quality, more coherent text. These pre-computed scores allow users to filter documents by quality threshold without running inference themselves, and to study the relationship between perplexity and downstream model performance.
Unique: Pre-computes perplexity scores for 100+ billion documents, eliminating the computational cost of running inference for quality assessment. Enables comparative studies of how perplexity thresholds affect training outcomes without requiring users to implement their own scoring pipeline.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed perplexity scores (eliminating inference cost) whereas competitors like C4 use heuristic filters (URL patterns, line-ending ratios); perplexity is a more principled, model-based quality metric but requires understanding of the reference model used.
Annotates each document with content classifiers and toxicity ratings, enabling category-based filtering and safety-aware data curation. The pipeline applies pre-trained classifiers to categorize document content (e.g., news, forums, documentation) and compute toxicity scores. These annotations are pre-computed and stored with each document, allowing users to filter by content type or toxicity threshold without running inference themselves.
Unique: Pre-computes both content classifiers and toxicity ratings for 100+ billion documents, enabling multi-dimensional safety and content-based filtering without requiring users to implement or run their own classifiers. Supports comparative studies of how content filtering affects model behavior.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed toxicity and content annotations (eliminating inference cost) whereas most web datasets require downstream filtering; enables safety-aware curation at scale without custom classifier implementation.
Publishes end-to-end processing scripts on GitHub that convert raw CommonCrawl HTML to deduplicated, annotated documents. The pipeline is fully open-source, enabling users to understand, verify, and reproduce the data processing methodology. Scripts handle HTML-to-text conversion, deduplication, quality signal computation, and filtering, allowing researchers to reprocess data with custom parameters or apply the same methodology to new CommonCrawl dumps.
Unique: Publishes complete, open-source processing scripts enabling full reproducibility and transparency of data processing methodology. Users can inspect, verify, and reapply the pipeline to new data, unlike proprietary datasets where processing is opaque.
vs alternatives: Open-source pipeline enables reproducibility and auditability vs. proprietary datasets (C4, Refinedweb) where processing methodology is proprietary or partially documented; enables research on data processing methodology itself.
Enables users to apply custom filtering strategies by combining 40+ pre-computed quality signals (perplexity, toxicity, content classifiers, deduplication hashes, etc.). Rather than providing pre-filtered 'ready-to-train' datasets, RedPajama v2 provides the raw signals and lets users define their own filtering logic. This architecture supports comparative studies of curation strategies and enables organizations to apply domain-specific or value-aligned filtering without reprocessing the base dataset.
Unique: Provides 40+ pre-computed quality signals enabling fine-grained, user-defined curation strategies rather than pre-filtered datasets. This architecture supports comparative research on curation methodology and enables organizations to apply custom filtering without reprocessing the base dataset.
vs alternatives: Enables comparative curation research (studying how different filtering strategies affect outcomes) whereas competitors provide pre-filtered datasets; gives users control over filtering logic but requires more implementation effort.
Provides 30 trillion tokens across 5 languages (English, German, French, Spanish, Italian) with consistent quality signal annotations applied uniformly across all languages. The architecture processes each language through the same deduplication, quality scoring, and classification pipeline, enabling comparative studies of language-specific data characteristics and training multilingual models on a standardized base dataset. Language-specific processing details are not documented, but the consistent annotation methodology enables cross-language analysis.
Unique: Provides 30 trillion tokens across 5 languages with identical quality signal annotations, enabling comparative studies of language-specific data characteristics and training multilingual models on a standardized base. Consistent annotation methodology across languages enables cross-language analysis.
vs alternatives: Larger multilingual coverage (5 languages, 30 trillion tokens) than RedPajama-1T (English-only, 1 trillion tokens) and most competitors; consistent annotation enables comparative language research, but limited to European languages vs. competitors with broader language coverage.
+3 more capabilities