MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates natural language responses with optimized inference for low-latency, high-throughput scenarios. Uses a distilled variant of the GPT-5.4 architecture with reduced parameter count and quantization techniques to achieve sub-100ms response times while maintaining semantic coherence. Processes text inputs through a transformer decoder with attention mechanisms, returning streaming or batch completions with configurable temperature and token limits.
Unique: Nano variant uses aggressive parameter reduction and likely INT8 quantization of the full GPT-5.4 weights, achieving 3-5x latency improvement over standard GPT-5.4 while maintaining 85-90% of reasoning capability — a different approach than competitors' separate lightweight models (e.g., Claude Haiku uses separate training, not distillation)
vs alternatives: Faster and cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo for high-volume tasks, but slower and less capable than full GPT-5.4; positioned between Claude Haiku and Llama 2 70B in the cost-latency tradeoff space
Processes images (PNG, JPEG, WebP) as input alongside text prompts and generates descriptive or analytical text responses. Implements vision transformer encoding that converts image pixels into embedding tokens, which are concatenated with text token embeddings and processed through the shared transformer decoder. Supports multiple image inputs per request and handles variable image resolutions through adaptive patching.
Unique: Integrates vision encoding directly into the nano model's shared transformer rather than using a separate vision API, reducing latency and cost for image+text tasks compared to chaining separate vision and language APIs. Uses adaptive image patching to handle variable resolutions efficiently.
vs alternatives: Cheaper and faster than Claude 3 Vision for simple image understanding, but less accurate than specialized OCR or document models; better for general visual QA than GPT-4V due to lower latency, but less capable for complex reasoning about images
Returns model outputs as a stream of tokens via Server-Sent Events (SSE) rather than waiting for full completion, enabling real-time display and early termination. Implements token-by-token streaming with optional backpressure handling, allowing clients to pause or cancel mid-generation. Each streamed token includes logprobs, finish_reason, and usage metadata for fine-grained control and cost tracking.
Unique: Implements token-level backpressure and early termination via SSE, allowing clients to stop generation mid-stream without wasting compute — most competitors require full generation before cancellation. Includes per-token logprobs in stream for uncertainty quantification.
vs alternatives: Faster perceived latency than batch-only APIs (e.g., Anthropic Messages API without streaming), but slightly higher per-token cost due to streaming overhead; better for interactive UIs than polling-based alternatives
Processes multiple requests in a single API call with per-request cost tracking and usage attribution. Batches requests are queued and processed asynchronously, returning individual responses with granular token counts (prompt tokens, completion tokens, cached tokens). Implements token-level pricing calculation inline, enabling real-time cost monitoring and budget enforcement per request or user.
Unique: Integrates cost tracking directly into batch responses with token-level breakdown (prompt/completion/cached), enabling real-time cost attribution without separate billing queries. Uses JSONL format for efficient batch serialization and custom_id for request correlation.
vs alternatives: Cheaper than on-demand inference for high-volume workloads, but slower than streaming APIs; better cost visibility than competitors' batch APIs (e.g., Anthropic Batch API) due to inline usage tracking
Caches prompt tokens across multiple requests, reusing cached embeddings for repeated context (e.g., system prompts, documents, conversation history) to reduce token consumption and latency. Implements a content-addressed cache keyed by prompt hash, with automatic cache invalidation on content changes. Cached tokens are billed at 10% of standard rate, enabling significant cost savings for applications with repeated context.
Unique: Implements content-addressed prompt caching with 90% token cost reduction on cache hits, using automatic hash-based invalidation. Separates cache_creation and cache_read tokens in usage tracking, enabling precise cost attribution for cached vs fresh requests.
vs alternatives: More efficient than manual context management or separate embedding APIs for repeated context; cheaper than Claude's prompt caching for high-volume RAG due to lower cache hit cost (10% vs 25% of standard rate)
Enforces model outputs to conform to a provided JSON Schema, guaranteeing valid structured data without post-processing. Uses constrained decoding (token-level masking) to prevent the model from generating tokens that would violate the schema, ensuring 100% schema compliance. Supports nested objects, arrays, enums, and complex type definitions, with optional schema validation before generation.
Unique: Uses token-level constrained decoding to guarantee 100% schema compliance without post-processing, preventing invalid JSON generation at the model level. Integrates JSON Schema validation into the inference pipeline, rejecting non-conformant schemas before generation.
vs alternatives: More reliable than Claude's tool_use for structured output (no hallucinated fields), and faster than post-processing + retry loops; comparable to Llama's JSON mode but with better schema expressiveness
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities