MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Image at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: GPT-5 Image | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-5 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both text and image inputs simultaneously using GPT-5's advanced reasoning engine, which integrates vision transformer architecture with large language model capabilities to understand visual content, spatial relationships, and semantic meaning within images. The model performs joint reasoning across modalities, allowing it to answer questions about images, describe visual content with high accuracy, and reason about relationships between text prompts and visual elements without requiring separate vision-language alignment layers.
Unique: Integrates GPT-5's advanced reasoning capabilities with state-of-the-art image generation, enabling not just image analysis but reasoning-driven visual understanding that can explain complex spatial relationships, abstract concepts in images, and perform multi-step visual reasoning tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Vision on complex visual reasoning tasks due to GPT-5's improved reasoning architecture, while also offering integrated image generation capabilities that competitors require separate models for
Generates images from natural language descriptions using GPT-5 Image's integrated image generation model, which applies advanced instruction-following mechanisms to interpret nuanced prompts, style specifications, and compositional requirements. The generation pipeline processes text embeddings through a diffusion-based image synthesis engine that respects detailed instructions about composition, lighting, artistic style, and specific visual elements with higher fidelity than prior generations.
Unique: Implements instruction-following mechanisms specifically tuned for visual generation, allowing the model to parse complex compositional, stylistic, and technical requirements from text and translate them into coherent images with higher semantic alignment than DALL-E 3 or Midjourney
vs alternatives: Superior instruction following for complex, multi-constraint image generation compared to DALL-E 3, with integrated reasoning capabilities that allow the model to interpret ambiguous or conflicting instructions more intelligently
Generates, completes, and refactors code across 40+ programming languages using GPT-5's enhanced reasoning capabilities, which apply multi-step logical analysis to understand code intent, architectural patterns, and correctness requirements. The model performs syntax-aware generation by maintaining context of language-specific semantics, type systems, and common patterns, producing code that is more likely to be syntactically correct, performant, and aligned with best practices without requiring post-generation validation.
Unique: Leverages GPT-5's reasoning architecture to perform multi-step code analysis before generation, enabling context-aware completions that understand architectural intent and produce code aligned with project patterns rather than just syntactically valid code
vs alternatives: Produces higher-quality code than GitHub Copilot for complex refactoring and architectural decisions due to superior reasoning, though slightly slower due to reasoning overhead
Analyzes documents, forms, and structured visual content using GPT-5's combined vision and reasoning capabilities to extract structured information, recognize layouts, and interpret handwritten or printed text with context-aware accuracy. The model applies document understanding patterns that recognize common document types (invoices, contracts, forms), understand spatial relationships between fields, and extract data while preserving semantic meaning and context.
Unique: Combines vision understanding with reasoning to interpret document context and relationships between fields, enabling extraction that understands semantic meaning rather than just recognizing text — for example, understanding that a date field is an invoice date vs. a due date based on position and context
vs alternatives: Outperforms traditional OCR engines on complex documents with mixed layouts and handwriting, and provides context-aware extraction that rule-based systems cannot achieve
Provides access to GPT-5 Image capabilities through OpenRouter's unified API layer, which abstracts authentication, rate limiting, and request routing while maintaining compatibility with standard HTTP REST patterns. The integration uses OpenRouter's request/response format for both image and text inputs, enabling developers to use a single API endpoint for multimodal requests without managing OpenAI's authentication or handling provider-specific response formats.
Unique: Abstracts OpenAI's authentication and response format through OpenRouter's unified API layer, allowing developers to use a single endpoint for both image generation and text processing without SDK dependencies or provider-specific code
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than direct OpenAI API for developers already using OpenRouter, with potential cost benefits through OpenRouter's routing and aggregation, though with added latency compared to direct API calls
Applies GPT-5's chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities to visual understanding tasks, enabling the model to break down complex image analysis into logical steps, explain visual reasoning, and handle multi-step visual problem-solving. The reasoning engine maintains intermediate conclusions about image content and uses them to inform subsequent analysis, producing more accurate and explainable results for tasks requiring visual inference or comparison.
Unique: Extends GPT-5's reasoning capabilities specifically to visual domains, enabling transparent multi-step analysis of images where the model explains its visual understanding process rather than providing opaque answers
vs alternatives: Provides explainable visual reasoning that GPT-4V and Claude 3.5 Vision cannot match, enabling use cases requiring audit trails or verification of visual analysis decisions
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Image at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities