Z.ai: GLM 4.5 ranks higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-4o Search Preview at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: GPT-4o Search Preview | Z.ai: GLM 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.50e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
GPT-4o Search Preview integrates live web search directly into the Chat Completions API, allowing the model to fetch and synthesize current information from the internet during inference. The model is trained to recognize when a query requires real-time data, formulate appropriate search queries, retrieve results, and incorporate them into responses without requiring separate API calls or external search orchestration.
Unique: Unlike traditional RAG pipelines or external search orchestration, GPT-4o Search Preview embeds search decision-making and execution directly within the model's inference graph, trained end-to-end to recognize when web data is needed and integrate it seamlessly without explicit function calls or multi-step orchestration.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than building custom search agents with tool-use (no function calling overhead), and more current than static knowledge cutoff models, but less transparent and controllable than explicit search APIs like Perplexity or You.com.
The model is trained to analyze user queries and conversation context to determine whether web search is necessary and to formulate effective search queries that will retrieve relevant, current information. This involves understanding intent, disambiguating vague queries, and translating conversational language into search-engine-optimized queries without explicit user instruction to search.
Unique: Search query formulation is implicit and trained into the model weights rather than explicit (no separate query-generation step or function call); the model learns to recognize search-worthy intents from conversational context and reformulate queries for optimal retrieval during training.
vs alternatives: More natural and context-aware than rule-based search triggers, but less transparent and debuggable than explicit query-generation agents with separate LLM calls for query refinement.
After retrieving web search results, the model synthesizes them into a coherent, conversational response that integrates current information with its training knowledge. This involves ranking retrieved results by relevance, extracting key facts, resolving conflicts between sources, and generating natural language that cites or references the information without explicit source attribution in the API response.
Unique: Synthesis happens within the model's forward pass rather than as a separate post-processing step; the model is trained end-to-end to integrate web results into its generation, allowing it to reason about result relevance and conflicts during decoding.
vs alternatives: More fluent and context-aware than naive concatenation of search snippets, but less transparent and auditable than explicit synthesis pipelines with separate ranking and citation steps.
The model supports streaming responses via the Chat Completions API, allowing partial responses to be delivered to the client as they are generated. When web search is involved, the model can begin streaming synthesized content while search results are still being retrieved, providing perceived latency reduction and progressive information delivery.
Unique: Search and synthesis happen concurrently with streaming generation, allowing the model to begin outputting tokens before all search results are fully processed, rather than blocking until search is complete.
vs alternatives: Lower perceived latency than waiting for complete search results before responding, but requires more sophisticated client-side handling than non-streaming APIs.
The model maintains conversation history across multiple turns, allowing follow-up questions and references to previous search results within the same conversation. The Chat Completions API accepts a messages array with system, user, and assistant roles, enabling the model to understand context from earlier turns and avoid redundant searches.
Unique: Search context is maintained implicitly within the conversation history; the model learns to recognize when previous search results are relevant to follow-up questions without explicit search result storage or retrieval mechanisms.
vs alternatives: Simpler than explicit RAG systems with separate memory stores, but less efficient than systems that explicitly cache and reuse search results across turns.
The Chat Completions API accepts a system message that can guide the model's behavior, including how aggressively it searches, what tone to use, and what constraints to apply. The system prompt is part of the messages array and influences the model's search decision-making and response generation without requiring model fine-tuning.
Unique: System prompt influence on search behavior is implicit and probabilistic rather than deterministic; the model learns to interpret instructions during training but may not follow them consistently, unlike explicit function-calling APIs with hard constraints.
vs alternatives: More flexible and natural than hard-coded search rules, but less reliable and debuggable than explicit search control via function calling or tool-use APIs.
Web search adds latency and cost to each API call, but the model is trained to balance search necessity against these costs. The model learns to avoid unnecessary searches when training knowledge is sufficient, reducing overall cost and latency for queries that don't require current information.
Unique: Search decisions are made implicitly by the model based on learned patterns about when search is cost-effective, rather than explicit cost-benefit analysis or user-controlled thresholds.
vs alternatives: More efficient than always-searching systems, but less transparent and controllable than explicit cost-aware search orchestration with per-request cost tracking.
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-4o Search Preview at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities