Z.ai: GLM 4.5 ranks higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106) at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106) | Z.ai: GLM 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-5 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes both text and image inputs simultaneously within a single inference pass, using a unified transformer architecture that encodes visual tokens alongside text embeddings. The model applies attention mechanisms across both modalities, enabling it to reason about image content, answer questions about visual elements, and generate text responses grounded in visual context. Vision inputs are converted to image tokens through a learned visual encoder before being fed into the main language model backbone.
Unique: Unified transformer architecture that treats image tokens and text tokens with equal priority in attention computation, rather than using separate vision encoders with late fusion. This enables deeper cross-modal reasoning where visual and textual information influence each other throughout all transformer layers.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Claude 3 Opus and Gemini Pro Vision on complex visual reasoning tasks requiring multi-step inference, particularly for technical diagrams and document analysis, due to larger model scale (1.3T parameters) and longer training on vision-language data.
Constrains model output to valid JSON matching a developer-provided schema, using a decoding-time constraint mechanism that prevents invalid JSON generation at the token level. The model's output is validated against the schema before being returned, ensuring type correctness, required field presence, and enum constraints. This works by modifying the sampling distribution at each token position to only allow tokens that keep the output valid JSON.
Unique: Implements constraint-based decoding at inference time using a modified sampling algorithm that prunes invalid tokens before probability distribution, rather than post-hoc validation. This guarantees valid JSON output on first generation without retry loops, and works across all model sizes.
vs alternatives: More reliable than Anthropic's structured output (which uses prompt engineering) and faster than Claude's approach because constraints are enforced at the token level rather than through post-generation validation or probabilistic guidance.
Accepts a list of tool/function definitions with parameters, and the model learns to emit structured function calls in response to user queries. The model outputs function names and arguments as JSON, which the developer's application then executes and feeds back to the model for continued reasoning. This enables agentic workflows where the model decides which tools to invoke, in what order, and how to interpret results. The model is trained to understand function signatures, parameter types, and return values.
Unique: Supports parallel function calling (multiple tools invoked in a single model output) and vision-compatible function calling (can call tools based on image analysis), unlike earlier GPT-4 versions. Uses a unified token vocabulary for both text generation and function call syntax, enabling seamless switching between modes.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Claude's tool use because it supports arbitrary JSON parameter types and parallel invocation, and more reliable than Gemini's function calling due to larger training dataset on tool-use patterns and better parameter type understanding.
Processes input sequences up to 128,000 tokens (approximately 96,000 words or 400+ pages of text) in a single request, enabling the model to maintain coherent reasoning across very long documents, codebases, or conversation histories. The model uses a modified attention mechanism (likely sparse or hierarchical attention) to handle the extended context efficiently without quadratic memory scaling. This allows developers to pass entire books, code repositories, or long conversation threads without truncation.
Unique: Achieves 128K context window using a combination of grouped-query attention (reducing KV cache size) and optimized position embeddings that extrapolate beyond training length. This is 4x larger than Claude 3 Opus (200K) but with better latency characteristics due to architectural efficiency.
vs alternatives: Faster inference on 128K contexts than Claude 3 Opus due to grouped-query attention reducing memory bandwidth, though Claude's 200K window is larger; better for real-time applications requiring long context, worse for absolute maximum context capacity.
Interprets natural language instructions and system prompts to adapt behavior without fine-tuning, using in-context learning to understand task specifications from examples (few-shot) or descriptions (zero-shot). The model's training includes extensive instruction-following data, enabling it to understand complex, multi-step tasks described in plain English and execute them consistently. This works through the model's learned ability to parse instructions, extract intent, and apply that intent to new inputs.
Unique: Trained on a diverse set of instruction-following tasks using RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback), enabling it to understand implicit instructions and adapt to novel task descriptions. The model learns to parse instructions compositionally, combining multiple constraints (tone, format, length) in a single response.
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than GPT-3.5 due to larger scale and RLHF training; comparable to Claude 3 Opus but with better performance on technical instructions and code-related tasks due to larger training dataset on programming content.
Generates syntactically correct code across 40+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, etc.) based on natural language descriptions, comments, or partial code. The model understands language-specific idioms, standard libraries, and best practices for each language. Code generation works through transformer-based sequence-to-sequence prediction, where the model learns patterns from billions of tokens of code in its training data and predicts the most likely next tokens that form valid code.
Unique: Trained on a curated, high-quality subset of public code repositories with deduplication and filtering for correctness, rather than all available code. This results in better adherence to best practices and fewer security anti-patterns compared to models trained on raw GitHub data.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GitHub Copilot on code generation from natural language descriptions due to larger model size and instruction-following training; comparable to Claude 3 Opus on code quality but faster inference due to optimized architecture.
Explicitly acknowledges its training data cutoff (April 2023) and can reason about what information it may not have access to, enabling developers to build systems that know when to query external data sources. The model understands temporal references in queries and can indicate uncertainty about recent events or developments. This is implemented through training data that includes explicit temporal markers and examples of the model declining to answer about post-cutoff events.
Unique: Explicitly trained to recognize and communicate knowledge cutoff boundaries, rather than silently hallucinating about post-cutoff events. This transparency enables developers to build systems that gracefully degrade to external sources when needed.
vs alternatives: More transparent about limitations than GPT-3.5, which often hallucinated about recent events without acknowledging uncertainty; less useful than Claude 3 Opus (trained to April 2024) for applications requiring current information, but better for applications that need explicit cutoff awareness.
Solves mathematical problems including algebra, calculus, geometry, and logic through step-by-step reasoning, using chain-of-thought patterns learned during training. The model can work through multi-step problems, show intermediate steps, and explain reasoning. This works by training the model on mathematical problem-solving datasets and using reinforcement learning to reward correct final answers and clear reasoning paths. The model learns to recognize mathematical patterns and apply appropriate solution strategies.
Unique: Uses chain-of-thought prompting during training to learn explicit reasoning steps, rather than relying on implicit pattern matching. This enables the model to show work and explain reasoning, making it more useful for educational applications than black-box mathematical solvers.
vs alternatives: Better at explaining mathematical reasoning than Gemini Pro due to explicit chain-of-thought training; less reliable than Wolfram Alpha for symbolic computation but more flexible for open-ended mathematical discussion and explanation.
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106) at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities