| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 5 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a bidirectional Model Context Protocol proxy that accepts stdio connections from local MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, etc.) and transparently forwards all tool calls over Streamable HTTP to a remote OP.GG MCP endpoint at https://mcp-api.op.gg/mcp. Uses StdioServerTransport for local consumer communication and StreamableHTTPClientTransport for outbound HTTP, with dynamic capability discovery at startup to mirror remote tools into the local server's tool registry without hardcoding tool definitions.
Unique: Uses dynamic capability discovery at startup (reads serverCapabilities from remote endpoint) and conditionally registers request/notification handlers on the local MCP Server, enabling the proxy to work with any remote MCP endpoint without hardcoding tool definitions. This contrasts with static tool registries that require rebuilding when upstream tools change.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom HTTP client integrations in each AI framework because it leverages standard MCP protocol, making it compatible with any stdio-based MCP client without modification.
Exposes 15 tools for querying League of Legends game data including champion statistics, summoner profiles, match history, resource guides, pro player stats, and esports schedules. Each tool accepts a desired_output_fields parameter to filter response payloads at the API level, reducing bandwidth and token consumption by excluding unnecessary fields. Tools are prefixed with 'lol_' and cover champion analytics, summoner rank/win rates, match timelines, and competitive esports data.
Unique: Implements field-level response filtering via desired_output_fields parameter, allowing clients to specify exactly which data fields to return. This reduces payload size by excluding unnecessary fields at the API level rather than post-processing, which is particularly valuable for token-constrained LLM contexts where every byte matters.
vs alternatives: More efficient than generic League APIs (Riot's official API, third-party REST endpoints) because it provides pre-computed meta analytics (win rates, pick rates, build recommendations) rather than raw match data, reducing the computation burden on the client side.
Supports three deployment methods: (1) Smithery configuration via smithery.yaml for automated process spawning, (2) manual npm/npx invocation (npx opgg-mcp or node dist/index.js), and (3) Docker deployment for containerized environments. All methods ultimately execute dist/index.js as a local stdio MCP server process. Enables flexible deployment across different environments (local development, CI/CD pipelines, containerized infrastructure) without code changes.
Unique: Supports three distinct deployment methods (Smithery, npm/npx, Docker) from a single codebase, enabling flexible deployment across different environments and use cases. This multi-method approach reduces friction for different deployment scenarios compared to single-method-only tools.
vs alternatives: More flexible than tools supporting only one deployment method because it accommodates Smithery-based orchestration, manual npm invocation, and containerized deployments without code changes.
Provides 6 tools for querying Teamfight Tactics (TFT) game data including meta deck compositions, item builds, augment recommendations, and play style classifications. Tools are prefixed with 'tft_' and return structured data about optimal team compositions for the current TFT set, itemization strategies, and augment synergies. Supports filtering by play style (e.g., 'aggressive', 'control', 'economy') and rank tier to surface meta-relevant recommendations.
Unique: Organizes meta data by play style (aggressive, control, economy) rather than just raw win rates, enabling AI agents to recommend compositions that match player preferences and game state. This contextual filtering is rarely exposed in generic TFT APIs, which typically return only statistical aggregates.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed meta compositions and augment synergies rather than requiring clients to aggregate raw match data, making it significantly faster for real-time coaching use cases compared to building custom analytics on top of raw TFT match APIs.
Exposes 6 tools for querying Valorant competitive data including agent statistics (pick rates, win rates, ban rates), map-specific meta, leaderboard rankings, and player match history. Tools are prefixed with 'valorant_' and support filtering by region (NA, EU, APAC, etc.) and rank tier to surface region-specific meta variations. Returns structured data about agent viability, map-specific strategies, and competitive player rankings.
Unique: Supports region-specific meta filtering (NA, EU, APAC, etc.), recognizing that Valorant competitive scenes have distinct agent preferences and strategies by region. This regional decomposition is rarely exposed in generic Valorant APIs, which typically aggregate global data.
vs alternatives: Provides pre-computed agent meta and leaderboard rankings rather than requiring clients to aggregate raw match data, making it significantly faster for competitive analysis compared to building custom analytics on top of raw Valorant match APIs.
Aggregates esports schedule, team roster, and tournament data across League of Legends, Teamfight Tactics, and Valorant competitive scenes. Returns structured data about upcoming matches, team information, player rosters, tournament brackets, and historical match results. Supports filtering by game title, region, and tournament tier (e.g., regional leagues, international events). Data is updated periodically as tournaments progress.
Unique: Aggregates esports data across three distinct games (League of Legends, TFT, Valorant) under a unified tool interface, allowing single queries to span multiple competitive scenes. Most esports APIs are game-specific; this unified approach reduces integration complexity for multi-game esports platforms.
vs alternatives: Consolidates esports schedules and rosters from multiple games into a single MCP interface, eliminating the need to integrate separate APIs for each game's esports data.
At startup, the proxy fetches serverCapabilities from the remote OP.GG MCP endpoint and dynamically registers corresponding request/notification handlers on the local MCP Server. This enables the proxy to work with any remote MCP endpoint without hardcoding tool definitions. When the remote endpoint adds, removes, or modifies tools, the local proxy automatically reflects these changes on the next startup without code changes. Implementation reads capabilities once at initialization and conditionally registers handlers based on what the remote server advertises.
Unique: Uses dynamic capability discovery at startup (reads serverCapabilities from remote endpoint) and conditionally registers handlers, eliminating the need for hardcoded tool definitions. This contrasts with static tool registries that require code changes when upstream tools change. Implementation in src/proxy-server.ts reads capabilities once and registers handlers based on what the remote server advertises.
vs alternatives: More maintainable than static tool registries because upstream tool changes are automatically reflected without proxy code modifications, reducing synchronization burden compared to manually-maintained tool definitions.
All 27 tools across League of Legends, Teamfight Tactics, and Valorant support a desired_output_fields parameter that filters response payloads at the remote API level. Clients specify which fields to include in the response (e.g., ['winRate', 'pickRate', 'banRate']), and the remote endpoint returns only those fields, reducing payload size and token consumption. This filtering happens server-side before the response is transmitted back through the proxy, minimizing bandwidth usage and LLM context overhead.
Unique: Implements server-side field filtering at the remote API boundary, allowing clients to specify exactly which response fields to include. This reduces payload size before transmission, contrasting with client-side filtering that requires transmitting the full response and then discarding unwanted fields.
vs alternatives: More efficient than client-side filtering because it reduces payload size at the source, saving bandwidth and token consumption compared to receiving full responses and filtering locally.
+3 more capabilities
ChatGPT utilizes a transformer-based architecture to generate responses based on the context of the conversation. It employs attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different parts of the input text, allowing it to maintain context over multiple turns of dialogue. This enables it to provide coherent and contextually relevant responses that evolve as the conversation progresses.
Unique: ChatGPT's use of fine-tuning on conversational datasets allows it to better understand nuances in dialogue compared to other models that may not be specifically trained for conversation.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than many rule-based chatbots, as it leverages deep learning for understanding and generating human-like dialogue.
ChatGPT employs a multi-layered neural network that analyzes user input to identify intent dynamically. It uses embeddings to represent user queries and matches them against a vast array of learned intents, enabling it to adapt responses based on the user's needs in real-time. This capability allows for more personalized and relevant interactions.
Unique: The model's ability to leverage contextual embeddings for intent recognition sets it apart from simpler keyword-based systems, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of user queries.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional keyword matching systems, as it understands context and intent rather than relying solely on predefined keywords.
ChatGPT manages multi-turn dialogues by maintaining a conversation history that informs its responses. It uses a sliding window approach to keep track of recent exchanges, ensuring that the context remains relevant and coherent. This allows it to handle complex interactions where user queries may refer back to previous statements.
ChatGPT scores higher at 43/100 vs OP.GG at 26/100. However, OP.GG offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The implementation of a dynamic context management system allows ChatGPT to effectively manage and reference prior interactions, unlike simpler models that may reset context after each response.
vs alternatives: Superior to basic chatbots that lack memory, as it can recall and reference previous messages to maintain a coherent conversation.
ChatGPT can summarize lengthy texts by analyzing the content and extracting key points while maintaining the original context. It utilizes attention mechanisms to focus on the most relevant parts of the text, allowing it to generate concise summaries that capture essential information without losing meaning.
Unique: ChatGPT's summarization capability is enhanced by its ability to maintain context through attention mechanisms, which allows it to produce more coherent and relevant summaries compared to simpler models.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional summarization tools that rely on extractive methods, as it can generate summaries that are both concise and contextually accurate.
ChatGPT can modify its tone and style based on user preferences or contextual cues. It analyzes the input text to determine the desired tone and adjusts its responses accordingly, whether the user prefers formal, casual, or technical language. This capability enhances user engagement by tailoring interactions to individual preferences.
Unique: The ability to adapt tone and style dynamically based on user input distinguishes ChatGPT from static response systems that lack this level of personalization.
vs alternatives: More responsive than traditional chatbots that provide fixed responses, as it can tailor its language style to match user preferences.