| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as a server that translates MCP client requests into TouchDesigner network commands, enabling LLM agents and tools to communicate with TouchDesigner instances over the network. Uses MCP's standardized resource and tool schemas to expose TouchDesigner capabilities as callable functions, with request/response serialization handling the protocol translation layer between MCP clients and TouchDesigner's native network API.
Unique: Bridges MCP (a standardized LLM tool protocol) directly to TouchDesigner's network API, allowing any MCP client to control TouchDesigner without custom integration code. Uses MCP's resource and tool schemas to abstract TouchDesigner's command structure into callable functions.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized MCP interface to TouchDesigner instead of requiring custom WebSocket or OSC implementations, making it compatible with any MCP-aware LLM client (Claude, custom agents) out of the box
Exposes TouchDesigner parameters, operators, and available commands as MCP resources with JSON schema definitions, allowing MCP clients to discover what can be controlled and what data types are expected. Implements MCP's resource listing and schema introspection endpoints so clients can query available operations before making calls, enabling intelligent prompt generation and parameter validation.
Unique: Implements MCP's resource and schema endpoints to provide full introspection of TouchDesigner's controllable surface, enabling clients to discover and validate operations dynamically rather than relying on hardcoded knowledge.
vs alternatives: Provides machine-readable schema discovery unlike REST APIs that require manual documentation reading, allowing LLM agents to understand available operations without prompt engineering
Handles reading and writing TouchDesigner parameters through the network protocol with automatic type conversion between MCP's JSON types and TouchDesigner's native types (float, int, string, bool, vector). Implements validation logic to ensure values conform to parameter constraints (min/max ranges, enum values) before sending to TouchDesigner, with error handling for type mismatches and out-of-range values.
Unique: Implements bidirectional parameter synchronization with automatic type coercion and constraint validation, ensuring type safety between JSON-based MCP protocol and TouchDesigner's strongly-typed parameter system.
vs alternatives: Handles type conversion and validation transparently, unlike raw network APIs that require manual type handling and constraint checking in client code
Enables calling TouchDesigner operators (CHOP, SOP, TOP, DAT) as MCP tools, with support for passing inputs and retrieving outputs. Implements operator invocation through TouchDesigner's network protocol, handling asynchronous execution and state polling to retrieve results. Supports querying operator state (enabled/disabled, current output values) to enable agents to understand the current scene state.
Unique: Wraps TouchDesigner operator execution as MCP tools with asynchronous result retrieval, allowing agents to trigger complex computations and query results without blocking, enabling sophisticated automation workflows.
vs alternatives: Provides operator-level abstraction over raw network commands, enabling agents to work with TouchDesigner's computational graph directly rather than managing low-level parameter changes
Groups multiple parameter changes or operator calls into a single network transaction, reducing round-trip latency and ensuring atomic updates. Implements command buffering and batch sending through TouchDesigner's network protocol, with rollback support if any command in the batch fails. Enables agents to perform coordinated multi-step updates (e.g., change position, rotation, and scale simultaneously) with guaranteed consistency.
Unique: Implements transaction-style batching for TouchDesigner network commands, providing atomic multi-command updates with rollback semantics, unlike individual parameter writes that may leave intermediate inconsistent states.
vs alternatives: Reduces latency and improves reliability for coordinated updates compared to sequential individual commands, critical for real-time control scenarios
Implements retry logic, connection pooling, and graceful degradation for network failures between MCP server and TouchDesigner. Detects connection loss, automatically attempts reconnection with exponential backoff, and queues commands during disconnection for replay when connection restores. Provides detailed error messages distinguishing between network errors, TouchDesigner errors, and validation errors to enable intelligent error recovery in agents.
Unique: Implements connection pooling with automatic reconnection and command queuing for transient failures, providing resilience for network-based control that simple request/response patterns don't offer.
vs alternatives: Survives temporary network interruptions and provides intelligent retry semantics, unlike stateless REST APIs that fail immediately on connection loss
Records all MCP tool calls, parameter changes, and operator executions with timestamps and execution results, enabling audit trails and debugging. Implements structured logging with configurable verbosity levels and optional integration with external logging systems (e.g., JSON logging to files or services). Provides execution traces showing command sequence, timing, and results to help agents understand what happened and diagnose failures.
Unique: Provides structured execution logging with timing and result tracking for all MCP operations, enabling full audit trails and debugging of agent-TouchDesigner interactions.
vs alternatives: Offers visibility into agent behavior and TouchDesigner state changes that would otherwise be invisible, critical for debugging and compliance
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs touchdesigner-mcp-server at 21/100. touchdesigner-mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while LlamaIndex is stronger on quality. However, touchdesigner-mcp-server offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities