| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing Theia IDE capabilities as standardized MCP resources and tools that can be consumed by LLM clients. Uses the MCP server transport layer to handle bidirectional JSON-RPC communication, allowing external AI tools and agents to query IDE state, request code operations, and integrate with Theia's extension ecosystem through a standardized interface.
Unique: Bridges Theia IDE directly into the MCP ecosystem by implementing the server side of the protocol, allowing any MCP-compatible client (Claude, custom agents) to interact with Theia's workspace, file system, and editor state through standardized resource and tool endpoints rather than custom REST APIs or WebSocket handlers.
vs alternatives: Provides standards-based MCP integration for Theia whereas alternatives require custom plugin development or REST API wrappers, enabling immediate compatibility with any MCP client ecosystem.
Exposes Theia's file system as MCP resources, allowing MCP clients to read, list, and query files and directories through standardized resource URIs. Implements resource handlers that map MCP resource requests to Theia's file system API, handling path resolution, permission checks, and content streaming for large files.
Unique: Integrates Theia's virtual file system abstraction (which supports local, remote, and cloud storage backends) into MCP resources, allowing agents to work with files regardless of underlying storage mechanism, whereas typical MCP file servers assume local POSIX file systems.
vs alternatives: Leverages Theia's multi-backend file system support to work with remote workspaces and cloud storage, whereas generic MCP file servers are limited to local file system access.
Exposes Theia editor operations (open file, edit text, apply refactorings, format code) as MCP tools that LLM clients can invoke. Implements tool handlers that translate MCP tool calls into Theia editor commands, managing text buffer state, undo/redo stacks, and multi-file edits through Theia's editor service API.
Unique: Wraps Theia's editor command API as MCP tools, preserving editor state consistency and undo/redo semantics across remote invocations, whereas naive implementations might bypass the editor and directly modify files, losing IDE state synchronization.
vs alternatives: Maintains Theia editor state consistency and integrates with IDE features (undo, syntax highlighting, diagnostics) when AI agents modify code, whereas direct file modification approaches lose IDE awareness and user context.
Exposes Theia workspace metadata (project structure, open files, active editor state, workspace settings) as MCP resources and tools, allowing AI clients to query IDE state without polling. Implements handlers that read Theia's workspace service and editor manager to provide real-time context about the development environment.
Unique: Exposes Theia's internal workspace and editor state through MCP, allowing AI clients to query live IDE context (open files, active editor, cursor position) rather than relying on file system inspection alone, enabling context-aware code generation.
vs alternatives: Provides real-time IDE state context through MCP whereas file-system-only approaches require agents to infer project structure and active context from directory contents, reducing accuracy and requiring additional parsing.
Allows MCP clients to discover and invoke Theia extension capabilities through MCP tools, exposing extension commands and services as callable tools. Implements a registry that maps Theia extension commands to MCP tool schemas, enabling dynamic capability exposure without hardcoding tool definitions.
Unique: Bridges Theia's extension command API into MCP tool schemas, allowing any MCP client to discover and invoke extension capabilities dynamically without custom integration code, whereas typical extension integration requires hardcoded bindings per extension.
vs alternatives: Provides dynamic extension capability exposure through MCP, allowing new Theia extensions to be used by AI agents without modifying the MCP server, whereas hardcoded tool approaches require server updates for each new extension.
Exposes Theia's integrated language servers (for code completion, diagnostics, go-to-definition, etc.) as MCP tools, allowing AI clients to query language-aware code information. Implements handlers that forward MCP requests to Theia's language server client, translating between MCP and LSP protocols.
Unique: Bridges Theia's LSP client to MCP, allowing AI agents to access language-aware code intelligence (completions, diagnostics, definitions) from integrated language servers rather than relying on syntax-only analysis, enabling semantic code understanding.
vs alternatives: Provides semantic code analysis through language servers via MCP whereas generic code analysis tools use syntax-only parsing, enabling type-aware and language-specific code generation and understanding.
Streams Theia IDE events (file changes, editor state changes, diagnostics updates) to MCP clients through MCP notification mechanism, enabling real-time synchronization of IDE state. Implements event listeners on Theia services that emit MCP notifications when workspace or editor state changes.
Unique: Implements MCP notification streaming from Theia events, enabling push-based state synchronization rather than pull-based polling, reducing latency and network overhead for real-time AI workflows.
vs alternatives: Provides push-based event notifications from Theia via MCP whereas polling approaches require repeated queries, reducing latency and enabling reactive AI workflows that respond immediately to IDE changes.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @theia/ai-mcp-server at 28/100. @theia/ai-mcp-server leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities