| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides a standardized MCP server implementation that handles bidirectional JSON-RPC communication between AI clients (Claude, other LLMs) and the Element platform. Manages server initialization, request routing, resource discovery, and graceful shutdown through the MCP protocol specification, enabling AI agents to invoke Element capabilities as first-class tools.
Unique: Implements the MCP specification as a first-class server for Element, enabling standardized AI agent integration without custom protocol translation or wrapper layers — uses native MCP request/response semantics for tool discovery and invocation.
vs alternatives: Provides native MCP support for Element whereas custom REST API wrappers require manual schema translation and lack standardized tool discovery that MCP clients expect.
Exposes Element's available resources (workflows, data models, templates, endpoints) as MCP resources with standardized metadata (name, description, MIME type, URI). Implements the MCP list_resources and read_resource handlers to allow AI clients to dynamically discover what Element capabilities are available without hardcoding tool definitions.
Unique: Implements dynamic resource discovery through MCP's list_resources/read_resource protocol, allowing Element's resource catalog to be queried at runtime rather than statically defined — integrates with Element's backend API to fetch and expose metadata in MCP-standard format.
vs alternatives: Enables runtime resource discovery unlike static tool definitions in OpenAI function calling or Anthropic tools, reducing maintenance burden when Element configurations change.
Implements MCP's call_tool handler to translate AI client tool calls into Element API invocations. Defines tool schemas (name, description, input parameters) that describe Element operations, validates incoming tool calls against these schemas, marshals parameters, executes the Element API call, and returns structured results back to the AI client.
Unique: Implements schema-based function calling through MCP's call_tool protocol, allowing Element operations to be invoked with validated parameters and structured error handling — uses JSON Schema for parameter validation before executing Element API calls.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized tool invocation semantics via MCP whereas direct Element API calls require custom error handling and parameter marshaling in client code.
Implements the core JSON-RPC 2.0 message transport layer that routes incoming requests from MCP clients to appropriate handlers (initialize, list_resources, read_resource, call_tool, etc.) and returns responses with proper error handling. Manages request IDs, async request/response correlation, and protocol-level error codes (invalid request, method not found, internal error).
Unique: Implements full JSON-RPC 2.0 message routing with proper request/response correlation and protocol-level error handling — handles async request processing with ID-based correlation to ensure responses reach the correct client.
vs alternatives: Provides standards-compliant JSON-RPC routing whereas custom message handling risks protocol violations and request/response mismatches.
Handles the MCP initialization handshake where the server declares its supported capabilities (tools, resources, prompts, etc.), protocol version, and implementation details to the client. Processes the client's initialize request, validates protocol compatibility, and establishes the session with agreed-upon capabilities.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol initialization with capability declaration, allowing clients to discover server features and protocol version at connection time — uses structured capability objects to advertise supported handlers.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized capability negotiation via MCP initialization whereas custom protocols require manual feature discovery and version checking.
Manages authentication to the Element backend (API keys, OAuth tokens, service accounts, etc.) and injects credentials into outbound Element API requests. Handles credential storage, refresh logic for time-limited tokens, and secure credential passing to Element endpoints without exposing secrets in logs or responses.
Unique: Implements credential management for Element API authentication with support for multiple auth types (API keys, OAuth, service accounts) — abstracts credential injection to prevent exposure in MCP responses or logs.
vs alternatives: Provides centralized credential handling for Element API calls whereas embedding credentials in client code or MCP responses creates security vulnerabilities.
Catches exceptions from Element API calls, network errors, validation failures, and other runtime errors, translates them into MCP-compliant error responses with appropriate error codes and messages. Distinguishes between client errors (invalid parameters), server errors (Element API failures), and protocol errors, and returns structured error objects that AI clients can interpret.
Unique: Implements error translation layer that converts Element API exceptions into MCP-compliant error responses with appropriate error codes and sanitized messages — distinguishes error types to help clients understand failure modes.
vs alternatives: Provides structured error handling for Element failures whereas raw API errors may be opaque or expose sensitive information to MCP clients.
Validates incoming MCP tool call parameters against JSON Schema definitions before executing Element API calls. Checks required fields, type constraints, format validation, and custom constraints defined in tool schemas. Returns validation errors to the client if parameters don't match the schema, preventing invalid Element API calls.
Unique: Implements JSON Schema-based parameter validation for tool calls, ensuring type safety and contract enforcement before Element API invocation — uses standard JSON Schema format for schema definitions.
vs alternatives: Provides declarative parameter validation via JSON Schema whereas manual validation code is error-prone and harder to maintain.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @siemens/element-mcp at 22/100. @siemens/element-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities