| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Parses Terraform execution plans (JSON format) to identify resource changes, dependencies, and potential blast radius. Analyzes which resources will be created, modified, or destroyed and traces downstream impacts through resource dependency graphs. Integrates with MCP protocol to expose analysis results to AI agents for decision-making before apply operations.
Unique: Implements consequence analysis as an MCP server that integrates directly into AI agent workflows, allowing agents to query plan impacts before execution rather than analyzing plans post-hoc. Uses dependency graph traversal to estimate blast radius rather than simple resource counting.
vs alternatives: Provides real-time consequence analysis integrated into agent decision loops, whereas terraform plan alone requires manual interpretation and external tools like Checkov only perform policy checks, not impact analysis.
Analyzes shell commands (bash, sh, zsh) to predict side effects including file system mutations, process spawning, network calls, and environment variable changes. Uses pattern matching and AST-like parsing to identify dangerous operations (rm, dd, curl with sudo, etc.) and traces command chains to estimate overall system impact. Exposes findings through MCP tool interface for agent evaluation.
Unique: Integrates shell command consequence analysis into MCP protocol, allowing AI agents to query command safety before execution. Uses pattern-based detection of dangerous operations combined with command chain tracing rather than full shell parsing.
vs alternatives: Provides agent-integrated safety checks for shell commands, whereas ShellCheck focuses on syntax/style issues and tools like audit-shell only log executed commands; recourse-cli enables preventive analysis before execution.
Validates MCP tool calls against their schemas and predicts consequences of tool execution based on tool metadata and parameter values. Analyzes tool definitions to identify which tools perform mutations, access sensitive resources, or have side effects. Evaluates whether a proposed tool call aligns with agent intent and flags potentially dangerous parameter combinations (e.g., delete with wildcard patterns).
Unique: Extends MCP protocol with consequence validation layer that analyzes tool calls against schemas and side-effect metadata before execution. Uses schema introspection combined with parameter analysis to predict tool impacts.
vs alternatives: Provides schema-aware tool call validation integrated into MCP workflows, whereas generic schema validators only check type correctness; recourse-cli adds consequence prediction and side-effect analysis.
Builds and traverses dependency graphs from Terraform plans and MCP tool definitions to trace resource relationships and impact chains. Identifies direct dependencies (explicit resource references) and estimates transitive impacts when resources are modified or deleted. Generates visual or textual representations of dependency chains to help agents understand cascading effects.
Unique: Implements dependency graph analysis as part of MCP server, allowing agents to query resource relationships and impact chains dynamically. Uses graph traversal algorithms to estimate transitive impacts rather than simple reference counting.
vs alternatives: Provides dynamic dependency analysis integrated into agent workflows, whereas static Terraform visualization tools only show structure; recourse-cli enables agents to query impacts for specific change scenarios.
Assigns risk scores and severity classifications to proposed actions (Terraform changes, shell commands, tool calls) based on impact type, blast radius, and resource criticality. Uses a scoring model that considers factors like number of affected resources, whether changes are reversible, and whether critical infrastructure is involved. Provides severity labels (low, medium, high, critical) to help agents make informed decisions.
Unique: Implements quantitative risk scoring for infrastructure and command consequences as part of MCP server, enabling agents to make risk-aware decisions. Uses multi-factor scoring model considering impact scope, reversibility, and resource criticality.
vs alternatives: Provides automated risk scoring integrated into agent workflows, whereas manual risk assessment is subjective and time-consuming; recourse-cli enables consistent, quantitative risk evaluation.
Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes consequence analysis capabilities as MCP tools callable by AI agents. Handles MCP protocol communication, tool registration, parameter marshaling, and result serialization. Allows agents to invoke consequence analysis tools through standard MCP client interfaces without direct library imports.
Unique: Implements full MCP server for consequence analysis, exposing all capabilities through standard MCP tool interface. Handles protocol-level concerns (serialization, async communication, error handling) transparently.
vs alternatives: Provides MCP-native integration for consequence analysis, whereas library-based approaches require code changes; recourse-cli enables drop-in integration via MCP protocol.
Parses multiple input formats including Terraform JSON plans, shell command text, and MCP tool definition schemas. Uses format-specific parsers to extract relevant information (resource changes, command operations, tool metadata) and normalize into internal representations for analysis. Handles format variations and provides clear error messages for malformed inputs.
Unique: Implements unified parsing layer that handles multiple input formats (Terraform, shell, MCP) with format-specific logic, normalizing diverse inputs into common analysis representations.
vs alternatives: Provides single tool for analyzing multiple action types, whereas separate tools require format conversion and orchestration; recourse-cli handles parsing and normalization transparently.
Analyzes operations to determine whether changes are reversible and identifies operations that could cause permanent data loss. Classifies operations as reversible (can be undone via backup/rollback), partially reversible (some data recoverable), or irreversible (permanent loss). Detects high-risk patterns like database deletions, encryption key destruction, and unbackup'd resource removal.
Unique: Specifically analyzes reversibility and data loss risk across Terraform, shell, and MCP domains, enabling consistent data protection policies regardless of operation type
vs alternatives: More focused on data loss prevention than generic consequence analysis tools; provides explicit reversibility classification to inform approval decisions
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs recourse-cli at 28/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities