Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs modelcontextprotocol-server-postgres at 19/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | modelcontextprotocol-server-postgres | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 19/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes arbitrary SQL queries against PostgreSQL databases and streams results back through the MCP protocol with automatic type inference. Implements query validation against the connected database schema to prevent malformed queries, and handles result pagination/streaming for large datasets. Uses PostgreSQL's native client protocol (via node-postgres or similar) to maintain connection pooling and transaction semantics.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol bindings specifically for PostgreSQL, allowing LLMs to execute queries as first-class tools rather than requiring custom API wrappers. Uses the MCP server pattern to expose database operations as standardized resources and tools that any MCP-compatible client can invoke.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom REST APIs or database middleware — LLMs get native PostgreSQL access through standard MCP tooling without additional infrastructure.
Automatically discovers and exposes PostgreSQL database schema (tables, columns, indexes, constraints, data types) as MCP resources that LLMs can inspect. Queries PostgreSQL's information_schema and pg_catalog system tables to build a schema model, then serializes it in a format the LLM can understand for query planning. Caches schema metadata to avoid repeated introspection queries.
Unique: Exposes schema as MCP resources rather than embedding it in tool descriptions, allowing clients to fetch schema on-demand and cache it independently. Leverages PostgreSQL's information_schema standard for portable schema discovery across PostgreSQL versions.
vs alternatives: More maintainable than hardcoding schema in prompts — schema changes are automatically reflected without code updates, and LLMs can query schema dynamically as needed.
Supports parameterized SQL queries with placeholder binding (e.g., $1, $2 syntax) to prevent SQL injection attacks. Maps JavaScript/TypeScript types to PostgreSQL types and validates parameter types before execution. Uses the underlying PostgreSQL client's native parameterization support to ensure parameters are properly escaped and transmitted separately from query text.
Unique: Integrates parameterized query support directly into the MCP server, allowing LLM-generated queries to be safely executed without additional sanitization layers. Leverages PostgreSQL's native parameter binding protocol to ensure parameters are transmitted separately from query text.
vs alternatives: Safer than string interpolation or regex-based sanitization — uses database-native parameterization that is immune to SQL injection by design.
Provides transaction control primitives (BEGIN, COMMIT, ROLLBACK) exposed as MCP tools, allowing LLM agents to group multiple queries into atomic operations. Supports configurable isolation levels (READ UNCOMMITTED, READ COMMITTED, REPEATABLE READ, SERIALIZABLE) and handles transaction state across multiple tool invocations. Implements automatic rollback on errors and connection cleanup.
Unique: Exposes PostgreSQL transaction semantics as MCP tools, allowing LLMs to reason about and control transaction boundaries explicitly. Maintains transaction state across multiple tool invocations within a single MCP session.
vs alternatives: More explicit than auto-commit mode — LLMs can reason about transaction scope and rollback behavior, reducing risk of partial updates.
Manages a pool of PostgreSQL connections to avoid connection exhaustion and improve query latency. Implements connection lifecycle management (acquire, release, idle timeout, max pool size) and automatically handles stale or broken connections. Exposes pool metrics (active connections, queued requests, idle connections) for monitoring and debugging.
Unique: Implements connection pooling transparently within the MCP server, abstracting away connection management from the LLM client. Exposes pool metrics as MCP resources for observability.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing connections at the application level — the MCP server handles pooling automatically, reducing latency and resource overhead for concurrent queries.
Captures PostgreSQL errors (syntax errors, constraint violations, permission errors, etc.) and translates them into structured, LLM-friendly error messages. Includes query diagnostics like execution plans (EXPLAIN output), slow query detection, and error context (line number, error code). Provides suggestions for common errors (e.g., 'table not found' suggests available tables).
Unique: Translates PostgreSQL errors into LLM-friendly diagnostic messages with suggestions, enabling LLMs to learn from failures and self-correct. Includes query execution plans to help LLMs reason about performance.
vs alternatives: More helpful than raw PostgreSQL error codes — provides context and suggestions that LLMs can use to improve queries iteratively.
Supports read-only mode that restricts the MCP server to SELECT queries only, preventing accidental or malicious data modifications. Enforces PostgreSQL role-based access control (RBAC) by connecting with a specific database user that has limited permissions. Validates query type (SELECT vs. DML) before execution and rejects write operations with clear error messages.
Unique: Implements read-only mode at the MCP server level, combining query-type validation with PostgreSQL RBAC to enforce least-privilege access. Allows safe deployment of LLM agents against production databases.
vs alternatives: More secure than relying on LLM prompts to avoid writes — enforces read-only access at the database layer where it cannot be bypassed.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs modelcontextprotocol-server-postgres at 19/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities