| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes arbitrary kubectl commands against Kubernetes clusters by wrapping the local kubectl binary through the Model Context Protocol, translating LLM function calls into shell invocations with cluster context management. The server acts as a bridge between Claude/LLM agents and kubectl, handling command parsing, output serialization, and error propagation back to the model for agentic decision-making.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol as a native bridge to kubectl rather than wrapping a REST API, allowing direct shell command execution with full kubectl feature parity and cluster context switching via kubeconfig
vs alternatives: Provides tighter integration with kubectl than REST-based Kubernetes API clients because it executes the actual kubectl binary, preserving all plugin support and context management features
Retrieves and lists Kubernetes resources (pods, deployments, services, nodes, etc.) by executing kubectl get commands with structured output parsing, converting raw YAML/JSON into LLM-friendly formats. The server translates resource queries into appropriate kubectl invocations and parses responses into structured data that Claude can reason about and act upon.
Unique: Parses kubectl output into structured formats that Claude can reason about, rather than returning raw text, enabling the LLM to make decisions based on resource state without additional parsing logic
vs alternatives: More accessible than direct Kubernetes API client libraries because it leverages kubectl's built-in output formatting and context management, reducing setup complexity for LLM agents
Creates and modifies Kubernetes resources by accepting YAML manifests and executing kubectl apply/patch commands, enabling Claude to generate or modify resource definitions and apply them to the cluster. The server handles YAML validation, conflict resolution, and server-side apply semantics to support both imperative and declarative workflows.
Unique: Integrates with kubectl's server-side apply semantics, allowing Claude to generate manifests that respect field ownership and merge strategies without requiring client-side conflict resolution logic
vs alternatives: Simpler than direct Kubernetes API PATCH calls because kubectl apply handles field ownership tracking and strategic merge patches automatically, reducing the complexity of manifest generation
Retrieves pod logs by executing kubectl logs commands with support for multi-container pods, previous container logs, and log tailing. The server captures log output and returns it as structured text that Claude can analyze for errors, patterns, or anomalies without requiring direct pod access.
Unique: Provides direct access to pod logs through kubectl without requiring port-forwarding or direct pod access, enabling Claude to analyze logs as part of agentic troubleshooting workflows
vs alternatives: More accessible than centralized logging solutions (ELK, Loki) for immediate troubleshooting because logs are retrieved directly from the pod without requiring separate log aggregation infrastructure
Executes commands inside running pods via kubectl exec, enabling Claude to run diagnostics, collect metrics, or modify pod state directly. The server translates exec requests into kubectl exec invocations and captures output, supporting both one-off commands and interactive shell sessions for agentic exploration.
Unique: Enables Claude to execute arbitrary commands inside pods as part of agentic workflows, allowing the LLM to gather real-time diagnostics and execute remediation without human intervention
vs alternatives: More flexible than pre-built monitoring dashboards because Claude can execute custom commands and adapt based on output, enabling dynamic troubleshooting
Establishes port forwarding tunnels to Kubernetes services via kubectl port-forward, allowing Claude agents to access cluster services locally for testing, debugging, or data collection. The server manages port-forward processes and provides connection details to the LLM for downstream tool integration.
Unique: Manages kubectl port-forward processes as part of the MCP server lifecycle, enabling Claude to establish service access tunnels and use them with other tools in the same agent workflow
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual port-forwarding because the MCP server manages tunnel lifecycle and provides connection details directly to Claude, enabling seamless multi-tool workflows
Manages Kubernetes cluster contexts and kubeconfig files, allowing Claude to switch between clusters, list available contexts, and validate cluster connectivity. The server reads kubeconfig files, parses context definitions, and executes kubectl commands against specified contexts without requiring manual context switching.
Unique: Abstracts kubeconfig management through MCP, allowing Claude to discover and switch between clusters without requiring manual context commands or environment variable manipulation
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom cluster discovery logic because it leverages kubectl's native context management, reducing the complexity of multi-cluster agent workflows
Deletes Kubernetes resources by executing kubectl delete commands with support for cascading deletion, grace periods, and force deletion. The server handles deletion policies and provides feedback on resource removal, enabling Claude to clean up resources as part of automation or remediation workflows.
Unique: Provides controlled resource deletion through MCP with support for cascading policies and grace periods, enabling Claude to safely remove resources as part of automated remediation
vs alternatives: More flexible than static cleanup scripts because Claude can make dynamic decisions about which resources to delete based on cluster state and error conditions
+2 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs mcp-server-kubernetes at 35/100. mcp-server-kubernetes leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities