| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Hosts a Model Context Protocol server that exposes Firefly III personal finance data through standardized MCP endpoints, enabling LLM clients to query and interact with financial records via a protocol-compliant interface. The server implements MCP's resource and tool schemas to map Firefly III REST API operations into LLM-accessible functions, handling authentication, request translation, and response serialization between the MCP protocol layer and Firefly III's backend.
Unique: Bridges Firefly III's REST API into the Model Context Protocol standard, allowing any MCP-compatible LLM client to access financial data without custom integration code. Uses MCP's resource and tool abstractions to expose financial operations as first-class LLM capabilities rather than requiring prompt engineering or custom API wrappers.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized MCP protocol access to Firefly III data, enabling seamless integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP clients, whereas direct REST API access requires custom client-side integration and exposes credentials to the LLM.
Translates Firefly III REST API endpoints into MCP-compliant tool definitions with schema validation, parameter mapping, and response transformation. The server introspects or pre-defines Firefly III operations (list transactions, create accounts, update budgets, etc.) and wraps them as MCP tools with JSON Schema specifications, enabling LLMs to discover and invoke financial operations through standard tool-calling mechanisms.
Unique: Implements MCP tool schema generation for Firefly III's REST API, providing JSON Schema-based parameter validation and type safety for financial operations. Abstracts away Firefly III's REST conventions (HTTP methods, endpoint paths, authentication) behind a unified tool-calling interface that LLMs can discover and invoke.
vs alternatives: Provides schema-driven tool access to Firefly III operations, whereas direct REST API calls require the LLM to understand HTTP semantics and manually construct requests, reducing reliability and increasing hallucination risk.
Exposes Firefly III financial entities (transactions, accounts, budgets, categories) as MCP resources with URI-based addressing and content retrieval. The server implements MCP's resource protocol to allow LLM clients to request and stream financial data by resource URI, enabling context-aware access to specific financial records without requiring tool invocations for simple data retrieval.
Unique: Implements MCP resource protocol for Firefly III entities, allowing LLMs to reference and retrieve financial data via URI-based addressing rather than only through tool invocations. Provides a knowledge-base-like interface to financial records that can be embedded in LLM context without explicit function calls.
vs alternatives: Enables resource-based access to financial data alongside tool-based operations, providing more flexible context management than tool-only approaches and reducing the number of explicit function calls needed for data retrieval.
Manages authentication between the MCP server and Firefly III backend, handling API token storage, credential validation, and secure request signing. The server implements credential management patterns (environment variables, config files, or secure stores) to authenticate with Firefly III's API without exposing credentials to LLM clients, ensuring that financial data access is properly authorized and audited.
Unique: Implements server-side credential management for Firefly III access, keeping API tokens and authentication details isolated from LLM clients. Uses MCP's server-client architecture to enforce that all Firefly III requests are authenticated and authorized at the server layer, not delegated to the LLM.
vs alternatives: Provides centralized, server-side credential management for Firefly III access, whereas exposing API tokens to LLM clients creates security risks and makes credential rotation difficult.
Routes MCP tool invocations and resource requests to appropriate Firefly III API endpoints, handles HTTP errors, and transforms responses back into MCP-compliant formats. The server implements request/response mapping logic that translates MCP parameters into Firefly III REST calls, catches API errors (rate limits, authentication failures, validation errors), and returns meaningful error messages to LLM clients without exposing internal API details.
Unique: Implements comprehensive request routing and error handling between MCP and Firefly III, translating between protocol layers and providing graceful degradation when Firefly III API calls fail. Shields LLM clients from internal API details and ensures errors are surfaced as actionable messages rather than raw HTTP errors.
vs alternatives: Provides robust error handling and request translation that makes the MCP server reliable and maintainable, whereas direct API exposure to LLMs requires the LLM to understand error codes and retry logic, reducing reliability.
Manages the MCP server process lifecycle including startup initialization, configuration loading, resource/tool registration, request handling loop, and graceful shutdown. Implements MCP server protocol compliance (handshake, capability negotiation, message routing) and handles concurrent client connections with proper error recovery and logging.
Unique: Implements MCP server specification compliance with Firefly III integration — handles full MCP protocol lifecycle (initialization, resource discovery, tool invocation, shutdown) while maintaining Firefly III API session state
vs alternatives: Provides a complete, ready-to-deploy MCP server vs. requiring developers to implement MCP protocol handling from scratch, reducing integration complexity
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs @firefly-iii-mcp/server at 22/100. @firefly-iii-mcp/server leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities