| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Parses a tree-like text description (using indentation or ASCII tree syntax) and generates a complete file system structure with directories and files. The MCP server interprets the hierarchical text format, validates the structure, and creates the corresponding filesystem artifacts, enabling AI models to scaffold entire project layouts from natural language descriptions without manual file creation.
Unique: Operates as an MCP server, allowing direct integration with Claude and Gemini via the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI models to generate filesystem structures as a native capability rather than requiring external tool calls or file I/O workarounds
vs alternatives: Simpler and more direct than shell script generation or REST API calls because it uses MCP's native tool-calling interface, reducing latency and eliminating the need for AI models to generate and execute shell commands
Works in conjunction with the tree-text-to-file-structure-generation capability to allow AI models to populate generated files with code content based on the same tree description or follow-up prompts. The MCP server accepts code snippets or full file contents mapped to the generated structure, enabling end-to-end project generation where the AI model describes both structure and implementation in a single workflow.
Unique: Integrates structure generation and code population into a single MCP tool, allowing AI models to generate complete projects without context switching between tools or multiple API calls
vs alternatives: More efficient than separate scaffolding and code generation steps because it maintains the tree context across both operations, reducing the AI model's need to re-describe the project structure
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing file generation capabilities as native tools that Claude, Gemini, and other MCP-compatible clients can invoke directly without HTTP requests or custom integrations. The server registers tool schemas with input/output specifications, handles tool calls from the AI client, and returns results through the MCP protocol, enabling seamless integration into AI agent workflows.
Unique: Implements the MCP server specification natively, allowing direct integration with Claude and Gemini without requiring HTTP wrappers, custom SDKs, or function-calling schema translation
vs alternatives: Lower latency and simpler integration than REST API-based tools because MCP uses stdio or HTTP with persistent connections, avoiding the overhead of HTTP request/response cycles for each tool call
Validates the tree-formatted input to ensure it represents a valid filesystem hierarchy before creating files and directories. The validation checks for circular references, invalid path characters, naming conflicts, and structural consistency, preventing malformed or unsafe filesystem operations. This capability runs before file creation, ensuring that only valid structures are written to disk.
Unique: Validates tree structure before filesystem operations, preventing partial writes and ensuring that the generated project layout is always consistent and safe
vs alternatives: More reliable than post-hoc validation because it catches errors before any files are written, avoiding the need for rollback or cleanup logic
Generates files and directories without enforcing a specific project template or framework. The tool accepts arbitrary tree descriptions and code content, allowing users to create custom project structures for any language, framework, or use case. This capability enables flexibility — users can generate a Node.js project, Python package, Go module, or any other structure by simply describing it in the tree format.
Unique: Does not enforce or assume any specific project template, framework, or language convention, allowing users to generate arbitrary filesystem structures
vs alternatives: More flexible than opinionated scaffolding tools (like Create React App or Cargo) because it supports any project structure, making it suitable for custom or non-standard use cases
Exposes file generation capabilities through the MCP protocol, which is supported by multiple AI models and clients (Claude, Gemini, and custom implementations). The tool does not depend on a specific AI model's API or function-calling format, making it compatible with any MCP-compliant client. This enables users to switch between AI models without changing their file generation workflow.
Unique: Uses the MCP protocol as an abstraction layer, decoupling file generation from specific AI model APIs and enabling compatibility with any MCP-compliant client
vs alternatives: More portable than model-specific integrations (e.g., Claude SDK, Gemini API) because it relies on a standard protocol rather than proprietary APIs, reducing the cost of switching models
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs constract-mcp-tool at 24/100. constract-mcp-tool leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities