| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates a complete Model Context Protocol server project structure with pre-configured tooling, dependencies, and TypeScript/JavaScript setup. Uses a CLI-driven template system that creates standardized MCP server layouts with built-in support for tool registration, request handling, and transport configuration, eliminating manual boilerplate setup for developers building MCP-compatible tools.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on implementation details, template system architecture, or how it differs from manual MCP server setup or other MCP scaffolding tools
vs alternatives: Provides opinionated MCP server structure out-of-the-box, but extremely low adoption (2 downloads) and lack of documentation make it difficult to assess competitive positioning versus building MCP servers manually or using Anthropic's official examples
Provides a structured mechanism for registering tool definitions with JSON Schema validation, enabling MCP servers to declare available tools with typed inputs and outputs. The boilerplate includes pre-built patterns for tool schema definition, parameter validation, and error handling that integrate with the MCP protocol's tool-calling interface.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on validation engine, schema constraint support, or how it handles edge cases in tool parameter validation
vs alternatives: Likely provides faster tool registration than manually building schema validators, but without documentation it's unclear if it offers advantages over Zod, Ajv, or other schema validation libraries commonly used in MCP implementations
Offers a command-line interface for initializing new MCP server projects with interactive or flag-based configuration options. The CLI handles project scaffolding, dependency installation, and environment setup, abstracting away the complexity of manually configuring transport layers, logging, and server startup code.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on CLI framework used, interactive prompt system, or how configuration is persisted and managed
vs alternatives: Provides faster project initialization than manual setup, but extremely low adoption and lack of documentation make it unclear if the CLI experience is competitive with alternatives like create-react-app-style generators or Anthropic's official MCP examples
Abstracts the underlying MCP transport mechanism (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, etc.) behind a unified interface, allowing developers to switch transport types without rewriting server logic. The boilerplate includes pre-configured transport handlers that manage protocol serialization, message routing, and connection lifecycle.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on transport abstraction architecture, supported transport types, or how it compares to MCP SDK's native transport handling
vs alternatives: Likely reduces boilerplate for multi-transport support, but without documentation it's unclear if the abstraction is more flexible or performant than implementing transport switching manually or using Anthropic's MCP SDK directly
Provides a pre-configured TypeScript project template with type definitions for MCP protocol messages, tool schemas, and server configuration. Includes tsconfig.json, build scripts, and type stubs that enable IDE autocompletion and compile-time type checking for MCP server development.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on type definition approach, whether types are auto-generated from MCP spec, or how comprehensive the type coverage is
vs alternatives: Provides immediate TypeScript setup without manual tsconfig configuration, but without documentation it's unclear if the type definitions are more complete or maintainable than manually typing MCP interactions or using Anthropic's official types
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs boilerplate-mcp-tool at 20/100. boilerplate-mcp-tool leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities