@4everland/hosting-mcp vs IntelliCode
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | @4everland/hosting-mcp | IntelliCode |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 40/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible AI agents to deploy applications to 4EVERLAND hosting infrastructure by exposing deployment operations through the Model Context Protocol. Implements MCP server specification with tool definitions that map to 4EVERLAND's REST API endpoints, allowing agents to orchestrate deployments, manage projects, and configure hosting settings through standardized tool-calling interfaces without direct API knowledge.
Unique: Implements 4EVERLAND-specific MCP server that bridges AI agents directly to 4EVERLAND's hosting platform through standardized tool definitions, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to orchestrate deployments without custom integration code
vs alternatives: Provides native MCP integration for 4EVERLAND hosting, whereas generic deployment tools require custom API wrappers or lack AI-agent-first design
Defines and registers MCP-compliant tool schemas that expose 4EVERLAND hosting capabilities (project creation, deployment, configuration) as callable functions. Implements the MCP tools specification with JSON schema definitions for each operation, parameter validation, and response formatting, allowing MCP clients to discover available hosting operations and invoke them with type-safe parameters.
Unique: Implements MCP tool schema registration specifically for 4EVERLAND hosting operations, with schema-driven parameter validation and discovery, enabling AI clients to understand and invoke hosting functions without hardcoded knowledge
vs alternatives: More discoverable and type-safe than direct REST API calls, and more standardized than custom agent tool definitions
Translates MCP tool invocations into 4EVERLAND REST API calls, handling authentication, request formatting, error mapping, and response transformation. Acts as an adapter layer that converts MCP tool parameters into properly formatted HTTP requests to 4EVERLAND endpoints, manages API credentials securely, and maps API responses back to MCP-compatible output formats.
Unique: Implements request translation layer that maps MCP tool invocations to 4EVERLAND REST API calls with built-in authentication and response transformation, abstracting API complexity from MCP clients
vs alternatives: Cleaner than exposing raw 4EVERLAND API to agents, and more maintainable than embedding API logic in agent prompts
Exposes 4EVERLAND project and deployment lifecycle operations (create project, deploy, update configuration, check status, list deployments) as MCP tools. Enables agents to manage the full deployment workflow including project initialization, code deployment, environment configuration, and status monitoring, with each operation mapped to corresponding 4EVERLAND API endpoints.
Unique: Exposes 4EVERLAND's full project and deployment lifecycle as composable MCP tools, allowing agents to orchestrate multi-step deployment workflows without manual intervention
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple deployment triggers, and more agent-friendly than requiring manual API calls
Provides MCP tools for managing project environment variables and configuration settings on 4EVERLAND, allowing agents to set, update, and retrieve environment-specific configurations. Implements secure parameter handling for sensitive values (API keys, secrets) and maps configuration operations to 4EVERLAND's configuration management endpoints.
Unique: Provides MCP-native environment and configuration management for 4EVERLAND projects, enabling agents to handle sensitive configuration without exposing secrets in prompts or logs
vs alternatives: More secure than embedding secrets in deployment scripts, and more flexible than static configuration files
Provides IntelliSense completions ranked by a machine learning model trained on patterns from thousands of open-source repositories. The model learns which completions are most contextually relevant based on code patterns, variable names, and surrounding context, surfacing the most probable next token with a star indicator in the VS Code completion menu. This differs from simple frequency-based ranking by incorporating semantic understanding of code context.
Unique: Uses a neural model trained on open-source repository patterns to rank completions by likelihood rather than simple frequency or alphabetical ordering; the star indicator explicitly surfaces the top recommendation, making it discoverable without scrolling
vs alternatives: Faster than Copilot for single-token completions because it leverages lightweight ranking rather than full generative inference, and more transparent than generic IntelliSense because starred recommendations are explicitly marked
Ingests and learns from patterns across thousands of open-source repositories across Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Java to build a statistical model of common code patterns, API usage, and naming conventions. This model is baked into the extension and used to contextualize all completion suggestions. The learning happens offline during model training; the extension itself consumes the pre-trained model without further learning from user code.
Unique: Explicitly trained on thousands of public repositories to extract statistical patterns of idiomatic code; this training is transparent (Microsoft publishes which repos are included) and the model is frozen at extension release time, ensuring reproducibility and auditability
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary models because training data sources are disclosed; more focused on pattern matching than Copilot, which generates novel code, making it lighter-weight and faster for completion ranking
IntelliCode scores higher at 40/100 vs @4everland/hosting-mcp at 22/100. @4everland/hosting-mcp leads on ecosystem, while IntelliCode is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes the immediate code context (variable names, function signatures, imported modules, class scope) to rank completions contextually rather than globally. The model considers what symbols are in scope, what types are expected, and what the surrounding code is doing to adjust the ranking of suggestions. This is implemented by passing a window of surrounding code (typically 50-200 tokens) to the inference model along with the completion request.
Unique: Incorporates local code context (variable names, types, scope) into the ranking model rather than treating each completion request in isolation; this is done by passing a fixed-size context window to the neural model, enabling scope-aware ranking without full semantic analysis
vs alternatives: More accurate than frequency-based ranking because it considers what's in scope; lighter-weight than full type inference because it uses syntactic context and learned patterns rather than building a complete type graph
Integrates ranked completions directly into VS Code's native IntelliSense menu by adding a star (★) indicator next to the top-ranked suggestion. This is implemented as a custom completion item provider that hooks into VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API, allowing IntelliCode to inject its ranked suggestions alongside built-in language server completions. The star is a visual affordance that makes the recommendation discoverable without requiring the user to change their completion workflow.
Unique: Uses VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API to inject ranked suggestions directly into the native IntelliSense menu with a star indicator, avoiding the need for a separate UI panel or modal and keeping the completion workflow unchanged
vs alternatives: More seamless than Copilot's separate suggestion panel because it integrates into the existing IntelliSense menu; more discoverable than silent ranking because the star makes the recommendation explicit
Maintains separate, language-specific neural models trained on repositories in each supported language (Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Java). Each model is optimized for the syntax, idioms, and common patterns of its language. The extension detects the file language and routes completion requests to the appropriate model. This allows for more accurate recommendations than a single multi-language model because each model learns language-specific patterns.
Unique: Trains and deploys separate neural models per language rather than a single multi-language model, allowing each model to specialize in language-specific syntax, idioms, and conventions; this is more complex to maintain but produces more accurate recommendations than a generalist approach
vs alternatives: More accurate than single-model approaches like Copilot's base model because each language model is optimized for its domain; more maintainable than rule-based systems because patterns are learned rather than hand-coded
Executes the completion ranking model on Microsoft's servers rather than locally on the user's machine. When a completion request is triggered, the extension sends the code context and cursor position to Microsoft's inference service, which runs the model and returns ranked suggestions. This approach allows for larger, more sophisticated models than would be practical to ship with the extension, and enables model updates without requiring users to download new extension versions.
Unique: Offloads model inference to Microsoft's cloud infrastructure rather than running locally, enabling larger models and automatic updates but requiring internet connectivity and accepting privacy tradeoffs of sending code context to external servers
vs alternatives: More sophisticated models than local approaches because server-side inference can use larger, slower models; more convenient than self-hosted solutions because no infrastructure setup is required, but less private than local-only alternatives
Learns and recommends common API and library usage patterns from open-source repositories. When a developer starts typing a method call or API usage, the model ranks suggestions based on how that API is typically used in the training data. For example, if a developer types `requests.get(`, the model will rank common parameters like `url=` and `timeout=` based on frequency in the training corpus. This is implemented by training the model on API call sequences and parameter patterns extracted from the training repositories.
Unique: Extracts and learns API usage patterns (parameter names, method chains, common argument values) from open-source repositories, allowing the model to recommend not just what methods exist but how they are typically used in practice
vs alternatives: More practical than static documentation because it shows real-world usage patterns; more accurate than generic completion because it ranks by actual usage frequency in the training data