GitHub Analytics MCP — Repo & Trend Research ranks higher at 45/100 vs Supabase at 42/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | GitHub Analytics MCP — Repo & Trend Research | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 45/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
This capability aggregates various statistics from GitHub repositories using the GitHub API, employing a modular architecture that allows for efficient data retrieval and processing. It utilizes caching mechanisms to minimize API calls and improve response times, ensuring that users receive up-to-date information on repository metrics such as stars, forks, and issues. This distinct approach enables deeper insights into repository performance over time.
Unique: Utilizes a modular architecture with caching to optimize API calls, enabling efficient retrieval of repository statistics.
vs alternatives: More efficient than standard GitHub API calls due to its caching mechanism, reducing latency and API usage.
This capability allows users to perform lookups for trending repositories based on various criteria such as language, time frame, and popularity. It leverages a combination of GitHub's search API and custom ranking algorithms to surface repositories that are gaining traction. The implementation includes a user-friendly interface for filtering and sorting results, making it easier to identify emerging tools and libraries.
Unique: Incorporates custom ranking algorithms to enhance the relevance of trending repository results beyond standard API offerings.
vs alternatives: Offers more refined filtering and sorting options compared to basic GitHub trending searches.
This capability enables users to perform advanced code search queries across GitHub repositories, utilizing the GitHub Code Search API. It supports complex queries with multiple parameters, allowing users to search for specific code snippets, functions, or documentation. The implementation includes syntax highlighting and result previews to enhance usability and facilitate quick assessments of code quality.
Unique: Utilizes the GitHub Code Search API with advanced querying capabilities, allowing for more precise searches than traditional methods.
vs alternatives: Provides more powerful search capabilities than basic text search tools by leveraging GitHub's specialized code search features.
This capability aggregates trends in developer activity across GitHub, analyzing metrics such as commit frequency, pull request activity, and issue resolution rates. It employs a data pipeline that processes real-time data from multiple repositories, allowing users to visualize trends and patterns in developer engagement. The architecture supports customizable dashboards for displaying aggregated data in meaningful ways.
Unique: Features a customizable dashboard for visualizing developer activity trends, which is not commonly available in standard GitHub analytics tools.
vs alternatives: Offers more comprehensive visual analytics compared to basic GitHub insights, making it easier to track engagement.
This capability surfaces emerging open-source tools by analyzing repository trends and activity metrics. It uses machine learning algorithms to identify repositories that are gaining popularity and might be useful for developers. The implementation includes a recommendation engine that suggests tools based on user-defined criteria, enhancing the discovery process for developers looking for innovative solutions.
Unique: Incorporates machine learning algorithms to identify and recommend emerging tools, setting it apart from traditional analytics tools that lack predictive capabilities.
vs alternatives: More proactive in suggesting new tools compared to standard GitHub analytics, which typically focus on existing data.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
GitHub Analytics MCP — Repo & Trend Research scores higher at 45/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities