| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes IDA Pro's reverse engineering API through the Model Context Protocol by implementing a proxy server that runs in a separate Python process from IDA, using zeromcp library for transport abstraction (stdio, HTTP, SSE modes). The proxy dispatches local MCP metadata requests directly while forwarding IDA-specific operations to the plugin's internal HTTP handler, enabling 30+ MCP clients (Claude Desktop, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf) to communicate with IDA without blocking the UI thread.
Unique: Implements process isolation between MCP protocol handling and IDA's single-threaded runtime using a proxy + plugin architecture with zeromcp transport abstraction, enabling hot reload and supporting 30+ heterogeneous MCP clients without modifying IDA's core
vs alternatives: Unlike direct IDA Python plugins or REST wrappers, the dual-process MCP bridge allows LLMs to control IDA through a standardized protocol while preventing network requests from blocking the UI, and supports both interactive (GUI) and headless (idalib) modes from a single codebase
Enforces strict thread synchronization for all IDA API calls through a decorator pattern (@idasync) that queues requests and executes them on IDA's main thread, preventing race conditions and crashes from concurrent access to IDA's single-threaded database. The decorator system chains through the RPC layer, ensuring that all operations from the MCP proxy are serialized before reaching IDA's kernel.
Unique: Uses a decorator-based RPC system that chains @idasync decorators through the proxy layer to serialize all IDA API calls onto the main thread, with explicit @unsafe flags for privileged operations (debugging, code execution), rather than relying on locks or async/await primitives
vs alternatives: More robust than naive threading or lock-based approaches because it guarantees serialization at the architectural level, and more maintainable than manual queue management because the decorator pattern makes thread-safety requirements explicit in the code
Exposes binary metadata (functions, strings, imports, types) as MCP resources that can be queried and subscribed to, rather than only through tool calls. Resources provide a read-only view of the binary's structure that LLMs can reference without invoking tools, enabling more efficient context management and reducing round-trips for metadata queries.
Unique: Implements MCP resources interface to expose binary metadata (functions, strings, imports) as queryable resources rather than only through tool calls, enabling LLMs to reference metadata in prompts without explicit tool invocations and reducing context management overhead
vs alternatives: More efficient than tool-only access for metadata because resources can be included in prompts directly, and more flexible than static exports because resources are dynamically generated from IDA's current analysis state
Implements a type-safe RPC layer that validates all requests and responses against JSON schemas before forwarding to IDA, ensuring that LLM-generated tool calls conform to expected signatures and preventing crashes from malformed requests. The system uses Python type hints and Pydantic models to define tool schemas, which are exposed to MCP clients for validation and auto-completion.
Unique: Implements a type-safe RPC layer using Pydantic models and JSON schema validation that validates all LLM-generated tool calls before forwarding to IDA, preventing malformed requests from reaching IDA's API and providing schema information to MCP clients for validation
vs alternatives: More robust than unvalidated RPC because it catches type errors early before they reach IDA, and more developer-friendly than manual validation because Pydantic models provide both validation and auto-documentation
Implements fine-grained access control through decorator-based capability flags (@unsafe) that gate privileged operations (debugging, code execution, memory modification) and require explicit opt-in from MCP clients. The system tracks which capabilities are enabled per client and enforces them at the RPC boundary, preventing accidental privilege escalation.
Unique: Implements decorator-based capability gating (@unsafe flags) that requires explicit opt-in from MCP clients to access privileged operations (debugging, code execution, memory writes), providing defense-in-depth against accidental or malicious privilege escalation
vs alternatives: More explicit than implicit permission models because @unsafe decorators make privileged operations visible in code, and more flexible than role-based access control because capabilities can be enabled per-client without modifying server code
Retrieves decompiled pseudocode, disassembly listings, and control flow graphs from IDA's analysis engine via MCP tools, supporting function-level and address-range queries. The system leverages IDA's built-in decompiler (Hex-Rays) and disassembly engine to generate human-readable code representations that LLMs can analyze, with cross-reference data (xrefs) showing function call graphs and data dependencies.
Unique: Exposes IDA's native decompiler and disassembly engine through MCP tools, allowing LLMs to request decompilation on-demand without parsing raw binary files, and includes cross-reference analysis that maps function call graphs and data dependencies discovered by IDA's static analysis
vs alternatives: More accurate than generic binary analysis tools (Ghidra, Radare2) because it uses IDA's proprietary decompiler and analysis engine, and more flexible than static decompilation because LLMs can iteratively request analysis of specific functions and follow xrefs interactively
Extracts structured metadata from the loaded binary including function listings with entry points and sizes, string constants, imported symbols, and type information (function signatures, struct definitions). The system queries IDA's internal database (IDB) to enumerate all discovered functions, strings, and imports, returning them as JSON objects that LLMs can analyze for vulnerability patterns or functionality mapping.
Unique: Queries IDA's internal IDB database to extract all discovered metadata (functions, strings, imports, types) as structured JSON, leveraging IDA's analysis results rather than re-parsing the binary, enabling LLMs to reason about binary structure without loading the binary themselves
vs alternatives: More complete than static binary parsing tools because it uses IDA's sophisticated analysis engine to identify functions and resolve imports, and more efficient than re-analyzing the binary because it reuses IDA's cached analysis results
Allows LLMs to modify the binary analysis in IDA by adding comments, applying patches, renaming functions/variables, and declaring types. Modifications are persisted to the IDB file, enabling iterative analysis where LLMs can annotate their findings and the next analysis pass uses the updated metadata. The system enforces write safety through optional @unsafe decorators for sensitive operations.
Unique: Enables LLMs to persistently modify IDA's analysis database (IDB) with comments, patches, and type declarations, creating a feedback loop where subsequent analysis passes use the LLM's annotations, rather than treating analysis as read-only
vs alternatives: More powerful than read-only analysis tools because it allows LLMs to iteratively refine their understanding by annotating the binary, and more integrated than external patch tools because modifications are stored in IDA's native format and immediately visible in the GUI
+5 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs ida-pro-mcp at 35/100. ida-pro-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities