| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $4.00e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text across 200K token context windows using a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 1 trillion total parameters and 32 expert routing. The MoE design activates only task-relevant expert subsets per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining semantic consistency across extended conversations, documents, and code. Supports 40+ languages with unified tokenization and cross-lingual reasoning.
Unique: Uses sparse Mixture-of-Experts routing with 32 expert subsets to handle 200K context windows efficiently — only activates relevant experts per token rather than dense forward passes, enabling cost-effective long-context inference at trillion-parameter scale
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 on long-context tasks by 15-20% while maintaining lower inference latency through expert sparsity; supports 40+ languages natively unlike Claude which focuses on English-first design
Analyzes and generates code across 50+ programming languages by leveraging the MoE architecture to route code-specific experts for syntax-aware completion, refactoring, and bug detection. The model maintains structural understanding of code semantics through specialized expert pathways trained on diverse codebases, enabling context-aware suggestions that respect language idioms and architectural patterns.
Unique: Routes code generation through specialized expert subsets in the MoE architecture, enabling language-specific syntax awareness and architectural pattern recognition without separate fine-tuning per language — single unified model handles 50+ languages with context-aware idiom selection
vs alternatives: Handles polyglot codebases better than Copilot (which optimizes for Python/JavaScript) and maintains code semantics across 200K token contexts unlike Cursor which relies on local AST parsing with limited context
Performs chain-of-thought reasoning through extended token sequences by leveraging the MoE architecture to route reasoning-specific experts that specialize in logical decomposition, constraint satisfaction, and multi-step planning. The model can break complex problems into sub-tasks, track intermediate reasoning states, and validate solutions against constraints within a single inference pass across the 200K context window.
Unique: Dedicates specialized expert subsets within the MoE architecture to reasoning tasks, enabling structured chain-of-thought reasoning that maintains logical consistency across 200K tokens without requiring separate reasoning-specific model weights — single unified architecture handles both generation and reasoning
vs alternatives: Provides more transparent reasoning traces than GPT-4 (which uses hidden reasoning) and maintains reasoning coherence across longer problem decompositions than o1-mini due to extended context window and expert routing
Generates responses grounded in provided context documents by maintaining semantic alignment between input passages and output text, with optional citation markers indicating source spans. The model uses attention mechanisms to track information provenance through the 200K context window, enabling builders to implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines where external knowledge is injected as context and traced back to sources.
Unique: Maintains semantic alignment between context documents and generated text through attention mechanisms that track information provenance across 200K token windows, enabling native citation support without separate fine-tuning — builders can implement RAG by injecting context and parsing citation markers from standard text output
vs alternatives: Supports longer context documents than GPT-4 (200K vs 128K) for RAG applications, and provides more transparent citation mechanisms than Claude which uses footnote-style references with less granular source tracking
Maintains coherent conversation state across extended multi-turn exchanges by treating the entire conversation history as context within the 200K token window. The model preserves speaker identity, topic continuity, and implicit context from previous turns without requiring explicit state management, enabling natural dialogue flows where references to earlier statements are resolved automatically through attention mechanisms.
Unique: Leverages the 200K token context window to maintain full conversation history as implicit context without requiring explicit state machines or memory modules — attention mechanisms automatically resolve references and maintain coherence across extended dialogue without separate context encoding layers
vs alternatives: Supports 2-3x longer conversation histories than GPT-4 (200K vs 128K context) before requiring summarization, and maintains better coherence across topic switches than smaller models due to MoE expert routing for dialogue-specific reasoning
Generates structured data (JSON, XML, YAML) that conforms to specified schemas by incorporating schema constraints into the generation process through prompt engineering and output validation. The model can be instructed to produce machine-readable outputs for specific formats, enabling integration with downstream systems that require structured data without manual parsing or transformation.
Unique: Generates structured outputs through prompt-based schema specification rather than native schema enforcement, relying on the model's instruction-following capability to produce valid JSON/XML — builders implement validation in application layer rather than model layer
vs alternatives: More flexible than specialized extraction models (which require fine-tuning per schema) but less reliable than constrained decoding approaches (which guarantee schema validity) — trade-off between flexibility and correctness
Understands and translates between 40+ languages by leveraging unified multilingual embeddings and cross-lingual expert routing within the MoE architecture. The model maintains semantic equivalence across language pairs without requiring separate translation models, enabling builders to implement multilingual applications where language switching is transparent to the underlying reasoning and generation processes.
Unique: Routes translation through cross-lingual expert subsets in the MoE architecture, maintaining semantic equivalence across 40+ languages without separate translation models — unified architecture handles both translation and semantic understanding through shared multilingual embeddings
vs alternatives: Supports more language pairs natively than GPT-4 (40+ vs ~20) and maintains better semantic fidelity than specialized translation APIs (Google Translate, DeepL) for context-dependent translations due to full language understanding rather than phrase-based matching
Follows complex, multi-part instructions and adapts behavior based on system prompts and in-context examples through instruction-tuning mechanisms that enable the model to interpret and execute diverse tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. The model can switch between different personas, output formats, and reasoning styles based on explicit instructions, enabling builders to implement flexible AI systems that handle varied use cases through prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Implements instruction-following through attention mechanisms that weight instructions heavily in the generation process, enabling flexible task adaptation without model retraining — single model handles diverse tasks through prompt specification rather than task-specific fine-tuning
vs alternatives: More flexible than task-specific models (which require separate fine-tuning per task) and more reliable than smaller models (which struggle with complex instruction sets) due to the 1 trillion parameter scale and MoE expert routing for instruction interpretation
+1 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0905 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training