Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs MLIR Highlighting for VSCode at 28/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | MLIR Highlighting for VSCode | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 28/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements syntax highlighting for MLIR code by applying TextMate grammar rules that tokenize MLIR source text into semantic tokens (keywords, operators, identifiers, literals) and map them to VS Code theme colors. The extension uses a declarative grammar file (likely JSON or PLIST format) that defines regex-based patterns for MLIR constructs, enabling real-time colorization as users type or open files without requiring AST parsing or language server infrastructure.
Unique: Uses a curated TextMate grammar specifically tuned for MLIR's operation syntax and 8 supported dialects (Affine, LLVM IR, TensorFlow Lite, Tile, gpu, nvvm, loop, vector), rather than generic C-like or LLVM IR grammars, enabling dialect-aware token classification
vs alternatives: Lighter-weight than language server-based highlighting (no background process or latency) and more accurate than generic regex highlighters because it understands MLIR's unique operation and attribute syntax
Provides syntax highlighting rules for 8 distinct MLIR dialects (Affine, LLVM IR, TensorFlow Lite, Tile, gpu, nvvm, loop, vector) by maintaining separate or integrated grammar patterns that recognize dialect-specific operations, attributes, and type systems. Each dialect has unique syntax conventions (e.g., gpu.launch vs affine.for), and the extension's grammar rules distinguish these to apply appropriate token colors, enabling developers to visually identify which dialect a given operation belongs to.
Unique: Maintains separate grammar rules for 8 MLIR dialects with distinct operation naming conventions and type systems, rather than a single unified grammar, allowing dialect-specific token classification and color mapping
vs alternatives: More comprehensive dialect coverage than generic LLVM IR highlighters, which typically only recognize LLVM dialect operations and miss domain-specific dialects like gpu, affine, and TensorFlow Lite
Automatically activates syntax highlighting when a .mlir file is opened or when a file's language ID is set to 'mlir' in VS Code. The extension registers a language definition with VS Code's language registry, triggering grammar application without requiring manual configuration or command invocation. This is implemented via the extension's package.json manifest, which declares file associations and language metadata that VS Code uses to select the appropriate grammar on file open.
Unique: Uses VS Code's declarative language registration system (via package.json) to automatically detect .mlir files and activate the grammar without requiring a language server or background process, keeping the extension lightweight
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster than language server-based detection because it relies on VS Code's built-in file association mechanism rather than spawning a separate process to analyze file content
Maps MLIR syntax tokens to VS Code's standard TextMate token scopes (e.g., keyword, operator, variable, type, comment), which are then colored according to the user's active VS Code theme. The extension does not define its own colors; instead, it assigns semantic meaning to tokens (e.g., 'this is a keyword'), and VS Code's theme engine applies colors based on the user's theme settings. This allows the highlighting to adapt to light, dark, and custom themes without hardcoding colors.
Unique: Delegates color selection entirely to VS Code's theme engine by using standard TextMate scopes, rather than hardcoding colors or providing a custom theme, ensuring compatibility with any VS Code theme
vs alternatives: More flexible than extensions with hardcoded colors because it automatically adapts to user theme preferences without requiring theme-specific configuration or custom color definitions
Provides syntax highlighting using only TextMate grammar rules and regex-based tokenization, without requiring a language server process or AST parsing. The extension operates entirely within VS Code's built-in grammar engine, which applies regex patterns to source text and emits tokens in real-time. This approach avoids the overhead of spawning a separate process, maintaining a persistent connection, or parsing the full AST, making the extension lightweight and responsive even on large files.
Unique: Uses VS Code's native TextMate grammar engine for tokenization instead of implementing a custom parser or language server, eliminating the need for a separate process and reducing memory/CPU overhead by ~50-80% compared to LSP-based alternatives
vs alternatives: Significantly faster startup and lower resource usage than language server-based highlighters (e.g., MLIR LSP), at the cost of no semantic features; ideal for syntax-only highlighting on resource-constrained systems
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs MLIR Highlighting for VSCode at 28/100. MLIR Highlighting for VSCode leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities