| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 4 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates text using a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 8 experts of 22B parameters each, activating only 2 experts per token for 44B active parameters. This sparse activation pattern reduces computational cost compared to dense models while maintaining 176B total parameter capacity. The routing mechanism dynamically selects which 2 experts process each token based on learned gating functions, enabling efficient inference on consumer hardware.
Unique: Uses 8 independent 22B-parameter experts with dynamic per-token routing (2 active experts) instead of dense transformer layers, achieving 44B active parameters from 176B total — a 25% sparsity ratio that reduces inference cost while maintaining parameter capacity for complex reasoning. This sparse activation pattern is fundamentally different from dense models like Llama 70B, which activate all parameters for every token.
vs alternatives: Faster inference than dense 70B models (sparse activation advantage) while maintaining comparable reasoning quality; more parameter-efficient than dense alternatives but requires specialized inference infrastructure unlike standard dense transformers.
Supports structured function calling through native integration with Mistral's constrained output mode on la Plateforme, enabling the model to generate function calls in a schema-compliant format without hallucinating invalid function names or parameters. The model learns during training to recognize function schemas and produce valid JSON-formatted function calls that downstream systems can parse and execute deterministically.
Unique: Implements function calling through constrained decoding that guarantees output conforms to provided JSON schemas, preventing hallucinated function names or invalid parameters. Unlike models that generate function calls as free-form text requiring post-hoc validation, Mixtral 8x22B's constrained mode enforces schema compliance during token generation itself.
vs alternatives: Guarantees schema-valid function calls without post-processing validation (unlike GPT-4 or Claude which require JSON parsing and validation), reducing latency and eliminating parsing errors in agentic workflows.
An instruction-tuned variant of Mixtral 8x22B is available, optimized for following user instructions, chat interactions, and task-specific prompts. This variant shows improved performance on mathematical reasoning (90.8% GSM8K, 44.6% MATH) and likely better instruction-following compared to the base model. The instruction-tuning process teaches the model to recognize task descriptions and generate appropriate responses aligned with user intent.
Unique: Instruction-tuned variant achieves 90.8% on GSM8K through explicit training on mathematical reasoning tasks, demonstrating that instruction-tuning improves task-specific performance. This variant is optimized for following user instructions vs the base model's general language modeling.
vs alternatives: Better instruction-following than base model; comparable to GPT-3.5-turbo on chat tasks (specific benchmarks unknown); open-source licensing enables fine-tuning for custom instructions vs closed-source models.
Achieves 77.8% accuracy on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation of knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, and social sciences. This benchmark score indicates broad knowledge coverage and reasoning capability across multiple domains. The score positions Mixtral 8x22B as a capable general-purpose model suitable for knowledge-intensive tasks, though specific subject-level performance breakdown is not provided.
Unique: 77.8% MMLU performance achieved through sparse MoE architecture with selective expert activation, enabling knowledge-specialized experts to activate for different subject domains. This allows efficient knowledge coverage without requiring full model capacity for every question.
vs alternatives: Competitive with other open-weight models on MMLU; lower than proprietary models (GPT-4, Claude 3) but higher than smaller open models (LLaMA 2 13B-34B); sparse activation enables this performance with lower inference cost than dense 70B models
Generates fluent text in English, French, Italian, German, and Spanish with native language understanding trained into the model weights. The model demonstrates strong cross-lingual performance on benchmarks like MMLU and HellaSwag, outperforming Llama 2 70B on multilingual variants. Language selection is implicit in the input prompt; no explicit language-switching mechanism is required.
Unique: Achieves native fluency across 5 European languages (English, French, Italian, German, Spanish) through unified training, outperforming Llama 2 70B on multilingual MMLU and HellaSwag benchmarks. Rather than using language-specific adapters or separate models, Mixtral 8x22B integrates multilingual capability into the base architecture.
vs alternatives: Single model handles 5 languages with better multilingual performance than Llama 2 70B, reducing deployment complexity vs maintaining separate language-specific models; comparable to GPT-4 multilingual capability but with Apache 2.0 licensing.
The instructed version of Mixtral 8x22B achieves 90.8% on GSM8K (grade-school math with majority voting over 8 samples) and 44.6% on MATH (competition-level mathematics with majority voting over 4 samples) through instruction-tuning that teaches the model to decompose mathematical problems into step-by-step reasoning chains. The model learns to recognize mathematical operators, maintain numerical precision, and apply algebraic transformations correctly.
Unique: Achieves 90.8% on GSM8K through instruction-tuning that teaches explicit step-by-step mathematical reasoning, with majority voting over 8 samples. This approach trades inference cost (8x sampling) for accuracy, making it suitable for applications where reasoning transparency is valued over single-sample speed.
vs alternatives: Strong grade-school math performance (90.8% GSM8K) comparable to GPT-3.5-turbo; weaker on competition-level math (44.6% MATH) than GPT-4 or specialized math models; open-source licensing enables fine-tuning for domain-specific math tasks.
Supports a native 64K token context window, enabling the model to process documents, conversations, and code repositories up to approximately 48,000 words without truncation or sliding-window approximations. The context window is implemented as a standard transformer attention mechanism scaled to 64K positions, allowing the model to maintain coherence across long-range dependencies and reference information from document beginnings in later generations.
Unique: Implements a native 64K token context window using standard transformer attention scaled to 64K positions, enabling full-document processing without chunking or sliding-window approximations. This is 4x larger than Llama 2's 4K context and comparable to GPT-4's 128K window, but with open-source licensing.
vs alternatives: 64K context enables single-pass document processing vs chunking-based approaches (RAG); larger than Llama 2 (4K) but smaller than GPT-4 (128K); open-source licensing allows fine-tuning for domain-specific long-context tasks.
Generates code across multiple programming languages using the sparse mixture-of-experts architecture, where expert routing dynamically selects relevant experts for code-specific patterns. The model learns to recognize syntax, semantics, and common code patterns during training, enabling it to complete functions, refactor code, and generate bug fixes. Specific code language support and performance metrics (HumanEval, MBPP) are not detailed in available documentation.
Unique: Applies sparse mixture-of-experts routing to code generation, potentially specializing different experts for different programming paradigms or language families. Unlike dense code models, expert routing may optimize for syntax-heavy vs semantic-heavy code patterns.
vs alternatives: Open-source code generation with sparse activation efficiency; specific code performance metrics unknown, limiting comparison to Copilot or CodeLlama; Apache 2.0 licensing enables commercial use without restrictions.
+4 more capabilities
Stable Diffusion utilizes a latent diffusion model to generate high-quality images from textual descriptions. It first encodes the input text into a latent space using a transformer architecture, then progressively refines a random noise image into a coherent image that matches the text prompt through a series of denoising steps. This approach allows for fine control over the image generation process, enabling diverse outputs from the same input prompt.
Unique: Stable Diffusion's use of a latent space for image generation allows for faster and more memory-efficient processing compared to pixel-space models, enabling the generation of high-resolution images without the need for extensive computational resources.
vs alternatives: More efficient than DALL-E for generating high-resolution images due to its latent diffusion approach, which reduces memory usage and speeds up the generation process.
Stable Diffusion supports image inpainting, which allows users to modify existing images by specifying areas to be altered and providing a new text prompt. This capability leverages the model's understanding of context and content to seamlessly blend the new elements into the original image, maintaining visual coherence. It uses masked regions in the image to guide the generation process, ensuring that the output respects the surrounding context.
Unique: The inpainting feature is integrated into the same diffusion process as the text-to-image generation, allowing for a unified model that can handle both tasks without needing separate architectures.
vs alternatives: More flexible than traditional inpainting tools because it can generate entirely new content based on textual prompts rather than relying solely on existing image data.
Stable Diffusion can perform style transfer by applying the artistic style of one image to the content of another. This is achieved by encoding both the content and style images into the latent space and then blending them according to user-defined parameters. The model then reconstructs an image that retains the content of the original while adopting the stylistic features of the reference image, allowing for creative reinterpretations of existing works.
Mixtral 8x22B scores higher at 58/100 vs Stable Diffusion at 39/100. Mixtral 8x22B also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The integration of style transfer within the same diffusion framework allows for a more coherent blending of content and style, producing results that are often more visually appealing than those generated by traditional methods.
vs alternatives: Delivers more nuanced and higher-quality style transfers compared to older methods like neural style transfer, which often produce artifacts or loss of detail.
Stable Diffusion allows users to fine-tune the model on custom datasets, enabling the generation of images that reflect specific styles or themes. This process involves training the model on additional data while preserving the learned weights from the pre-trained model, allowing for rapid adaptation to new domains. Users can specify training parameters and monitor performance metrics to ensure the model meets their requirements.
Unique: The ability to fine-tune on custom datasets while leveraging the pre-trained model's knowledge allows for quicker adaptation and better performance on specific tasks compared to training from scratch.
vs alternatives: More accessible for users with limited data compared to other models that require extensive retraining from the ground up.