Z.ai: GLM 5 ranks higher at 24/100 vs Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Z.ai: GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 8 expert modules, each containing 22B parameters, where only 2 experts are activated per token via a learned gating mechanism. This design achieves 39B active parameters out of 141B total, enabling instruction-following at near-70B model quality while maintaining inference efficiency comparable to 13B models. The routing mechanism learns which expert combinations best handle different token types (code, math, reasoning, general text) during fine-tuning.
Unique: Uses a learned sparse gating mechanism to activate only 2 of 8 experts per token, achieving 39B active parameters with full 141B parameter capacity available for diverse domains. This is architecturally distinct from dense models and from other MoE approaches that may use fixed routing or different expert counts.
vs alternatives: Delivers 70B-class instruction-following quality at 13B-class inference cost and latency, outperforming dense 13B models on math/code while being 5-10x cheaper than running a full 70B model.
Trained with specialized instruction data for mathematical problem-solving, enabling step-by-step symbolic reasoning, algebraic manipulation, and multi-step calculation chains. The model learns to decompose complex math problems into intermediate steps, apply mathematical rules, and verify solutions. This capability emerges from both the base Mixtral architecture and the instruct fine-tuning process that emphasizes reasoning transparency.
Unique: Combines sparse MoE routing with instruction fine-tuning specifically optimized for mathematical reasoning, allowing different experts to specialize in algebra, calculus, statistics, and logic domains while maintaining unified instruction-following interface.
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-3.5 on mathematical reasoning benchmarks while being significantly cheaper, though slightly behind GPT-4 on advanced symbolic manipulation tasks.
Generates syntactically correct code across 40+ programming languages through instruction-tuned patterns learned from diverse code repositories and technical documentation. The model understands code structure, common idioms, error patterns, and best practices for each language. It can generate complete functions, debug existing code, explain technical concepts, and suggest optimizations by leveraging both the base model's code understanding and the instruct fine-tuning that emphasizes clarity and correctness.
Unique: Leverages MoE architecture where specific experts specialize in different programming paradigms (imperative, functional, OOP) and language families, enabling consistent code quality across 40+ languages while maintaining instruction-following clarity.
vs alternatives: Comparable to GitHub Copilot for single-file code generation but with better multi-language support and lower API costs; stronger than GPT-3.5 on code reasoning but slightly behind Claude 3 Opus on complex architectural decisions.
Maintains coherent conversation state across multiple turns by processing full conversation history within the 32K token context window, allowing the model to reference previous statements, correct misunderstandings, and build on prior context. The instruction fine-tuning teaches the model to track conversation state, acknowledge context shifts, and maintain consistent persona and knowledge across turns without explicit state management.
Unique: Instruction fine-tuning specifically teaches the model to explicitly acknowledge and reference conversation context, making context awareness transparent in responses rather than implicit. This differs from base models that may lose context awareness without explicit prompting.
vs alternatives: Maintains conversation coherence comparable to GPT-4 within the 32K context window, with better cost efficiency; requires external persistence unlike some managed chatbot platforms but offers more control over conversation flow.
Generates responses token-by-token and streams them to the client in real-time via HTTP streaming (Server-Sent Events or chunked transfer encoding), enabling progressive response display without waiting for complete generation. The API returns tokens as they are generated by the model, allowing clients to display partial responses and provide immediate feedback to users while the full response is still being computed.
Unique: Implements streaming at the API level via OpenRouter's infrastructure, allowing clients to consume tokens as they are generated without requiring custom server-side streaming logic. This is abstracted away from the model itself but is a core capability of the API integration.
vs alternatives: Provides streaming capability comparable to OpenAI's API with better cost efficiency; simpler to implement than self-hosted streaming but with less control over the underlying generation process.
Responds to structured instructions that specify output format (JSON, XML, Markdown, plain text, code blocks) and follows those format constraints with high consistency. The instruction fine-tuning teaches the model to parse format requirements from prompts and generate responses that conform to specified schemas, enabling reliable structured output extraction without requiring separate parsing layers.
Unique: Instruction fine-tuning specifically optimizes for format compliance, teaching the model to prioritize format adherence when explicitly specified. This is more reliable than base models for format-constrained generation without requiring separate constrained decoding mechanisms.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than using specialized function-calling APIs for structured output; comparable to Claude's JSON mode but with better multi-format support and lower API costs.
Synthesizes knowledge across multiple specialized domains (software engineering, mathematics, logic, natural language reasoning) by routing different types of problems to specialized expert modules within the MoE architecture. When processing a request, the gating mechanism activates experts that have learned to handle that specific domain, enabling coherent responses that combine domain-specific knowledge with general reasoning capabilities.
Unique: MoE architecture with expert specialization enables simultaneous optimization for multiple domains without the quality degradation typical of single dense models trying to handle diverse tasks. Expert routing learns to activate domain-appropriate experts based on input characteristics.
vs alternatives: Outperforms single-domain specialized models on cross-domain problems; more efficient than running multiple specialized models in parallel while maintaining comparable quality to larger dense models across all domains.
Processes input sequences up to 32,000 tokens (approximately 24,000 words or 100+ pages of text) in a single request, enabling analysis of entire documents, codebases, or conversation histories without chunking or summarization. The model maintains attention across the full context window, allowing it to reference information from any part of the input and generate coherent responses that integrate information from the entire context.
Unique: 32K context window is implemented at the model architecture level (using rotary position embeddings and efficient attention mechanisms), not as a post-hoc extension. This enables stable performance across the full context range without the degradation typical of extended context windows.
vs alternatives: Comparable to Claude 3's 200K context window for most practical tasks but with significantly lower API costs; longer context than GPT-3.5 (4K) or standard GPT-4 (8K) while maintaining reasonable latency and cost.
+2 more capabilities
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Mistral: Mixtral 8x22B Instruct at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities