| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-6 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes multi-turn conversations with up to 32K token context window, maintaining coherent reasoning across dialogue turns through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and user intent evolution. Implements sliding-window attention patterns to efficiently manage long contexts while preserving semantic relationships between early and recent exchanges.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 uses optimized transformer architecture with efficient attention patterns specifically tuned for 32K context, achieving lower latency than competitors on long-context tasks through architectural improvements over the 24.07 version
vs alternatives: Provides better cost-to-performance ratio than GPT-4 for multi-turn conversations while maintaining comparable reasoning quality with lower API costs
Executes complex multi-step instructions with high fidelity through fine-tuning on instruction-following datasets and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Supports explicit output format requests (JSON, XML, markdown, code blocks) by conditioning generation on format tokens, enabling deterministic parsing of model outputs without post-processing regex.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 implements format-aware token conditioning during generation, allowing explicit control over output structure through prompt directives rather than relying solely on post-processing or constrained decoding
vs alternatives: More reliable structured output than smaller open models while maintaining faster inference than GPT-4 for format-constrained tasks
Provides model access through REST API with support for streaming responses (token-by-token delivery) and batch processing (multiple requests in single API call). Implements request queuing, rate limiting, and load balancing on the backend to handle concurrent requests efficiently, with streaming enabled through server-sent events (SSE) for real-time token delivery.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 is accessed through OpenRouter's unified API layer, providing streaming and batching capabilities with transparent provider routing and cost optimization
vs alternatives: Provides unified API access to Mistral models with streaming support comparable to direct Mistral API while offering cost optimization through provider routing
Analyzes and generates code through transformer embeddings trained on diverse programming language corpora, supporting syntax-aware completion and bug detection across Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, and 75+ other languages. Uses byte-pair encoding (BPE) tokenization optimized for code tokens, enabling efficient representation of variable names, operators, and language-specific syntax patterns.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 uses language-agnostic code tokenization with BPE optimization for operator and identifier patterns, enabling consistent performance across 80+ languages without language-specific fine-tuning
vs alternatives: Supports broader language coverage than Copilot while maintaining competitive code quality for mainstream languages at lower cost
Enables tool use through structured function calling via JSON schema definitions, where the model generates function names and arguments as structured tokens rather than free-form text. Implements a function registry pattern where tools are declared with parameter schemas, and the model's output is parsed into executable function calls with type validation before invocation.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 implements native function calling through structured token generation with schema validation, allowing deterministic parsing of tool invocations without regex or custom parsing logic
vs alternatives: More reliable function calling than open-source models while maintaining faster response times than GPT-4 for tool-use workflows
Performs multi-step reasoning through implicit chain-of-thought patterns learned during training, where the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before producing final answers. Supports explicit prompting for step-by-step reasoning through techniques like 'think step by step' or structured reasoning templates, enabling the model to break complex problems into manageable sub-problems.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 implements implicit chain-of-thought through training on reasoning-heavy datasets, enabling natural step-by-step decomposition without explicit prompting while maintaining efficiency through optimized token generation
vs alternatives: Provides reasoning quality comparable to GPT-4 while maintaining lower latency and cost through more efficient token usage
Generates and translates text across 40+ languages through multilingual transformer embeddings trained on parallel corpora and monolingual text in diverse languages. Uses language-specific tokenization patterns and cross-lingual transfer learning to maintain semantic consistency during translation while preserving cultural nuances and idiomatic expressions.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 uses cross-lingual embeddings with language-specific tokenization, enabling efficient translation across 40+ languages without separate language-specific models
vs alternatives: Provides competitive translation quality with lower latency than dedicated translation APIs while supporting broader language coverage
Extracts key information and generates summaries from long documents through attention mechanisms that identify salient content and abstractive summarization patterns learned during training. Supports multiple summarization styles (bullet points, paragraphs, executive summaries) and information extraction (named entities, key facts, relationships) through prompt-based control without requiring fine-tuning.
Unique: Mistral Large 2411 implements abstractive summarization through attention-based salience detection combined with controllable generation, enabling multiple summary styles without separate models
vs alternatives: Provides faster summarization than GPT-4 while maintaining comparable quality for general-domain documents
+3 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Mistral Large 2411 scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities