| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent text responses to natural language instructions using a 24B parameter decoder-only transformer optimized for reduced forward-pass latency through architectural simplification (fewer layers than competing models). Achieves ~150 tokens/second throughput on single GPU hardware, enabling real-time conversational interactions without cloud round-trips. Instruction-tuned variant available for direct deployment without additional fine-tuning.
Unique: Achieves 3x faster inference than Llama 3.3 70B on identical hardware through architectural optimization (fewer layers) rather than quantization alone, while maintaining competitive performance on human evaluation benchmarks for coding and general tasks
vs alternatives: Faster than Llama 3.3 70B and more efficient than Qwen 32B while remaining competitive on coding/math benchmarks, making it ideal for latency-sensitive production workloads where inference speed directly impacts user experience
Generates and analyzes code across multiple programming languages using transformer-based pattern matching trained on diverse code corpora. Evaluated against GPT-4o-mini and Llama 3.3 70B using Human Eval benchmarks with 1000+ proprietary prompts; claims competitive performance despite 24B parameter count vs 70B+ alternatives. Supports function calling and structured output for programmatic code manipulation.
Unique: Achieves Human Eval performance competitive with Llama 3.3 70B and GPT-4o-mini despite being 3x smaller, evaluated against 1000+ proprietary coding prompts rather than standard public benchmarks, enabling cost-effective code generation without sacrificing quality
vs alternatives: More efficient than Copilot or GPT-4o-mini for code generation while maintaining competitive quality, and deployable locally unlike cloud-only alternatives, making it ideal for teams prioritizing latency and privacy
Released under Apache 2.0 license (both pretrained and instruction-tuned checkpoints) enabling unrestricted commercial use, modification, and redistribution. Permits building proprietary products, internal tools, and commercial services without licensing fees or attribution requirements. Supports self-hosting, fine-tuning, and derivative works without legal restrictions.
Unique: Fully open-source under Apache 2.0 with explicit commercial use permission, enabling unrestricted deployment in proprietary products unlike some open-source models with restrictive licenses or usage policies
vs alternatives: More permissive licensing than models with non-commercial restrictions or usage policies, and fully open-source unlike proprietary alternatives, enabling transparent and legally unrestricted commercial deployment
Maintains conversation context across multiple turns through instruction-tuned design that preserves prior messages and user intent. Supports natural dialogue flow with coherent reference resolution and context-aware responses without explicit state management code. Enables building stateful chatbots and conversational agents without external session storage (though persistence requires external state store).
Unique: Instruction-tuned for natural multi-turn conversations with low-latency inference (150 tokens/second), enabling real-time conversational experiences without cloud API round-trips while maintaining context awareness
vs alternatives: Faster multi-turn inference than larger models due to architectural efficiency, and deployable locally unlike cloud alternatives, though requires external state management unlike some managed conversational AI platforms
Solves mathematical problems and performs symbolic reasoning using transformer-based pattern matching on mathematical corpora. Benchmarked against larger models (Llama 3.3 70B, GPT-4o-mini) on mathematical reasoning tasks; claims outperformance despite smaller parameter count. Supports step-by-step reasoning through text generation without explicit symbolic math engines.
Unique: Outperforms larger models (Llama 3.3 70B, GPT-4o-mini) on mathematical reasoning benchmarks despite 24B parameter count, using pure transformer-based pattern matching without symbolic math engines or external solvers
vs alternatives: More efficient than GPT-4o-mini for math problems while remaining competitive on quality, and deployable locally unlike cloud alternatives, though lacks symbolic math integration of specialized tools like Wolfram Alpha
Enables agentic workflows by supporting function calling through schema-based function registries, allowing the model to invoke external tools and APIs based on natural language instructions. Integrates with Mistral AI API and self-hosted deployments to parse structured function calls and dispatch them to registered handlers. Supports multiple function definitions per request with conditional logic for tool selection.
Unique: Optimized for low-latency function calling in agentic workflows through architectural efficiency (3x faster than Llama 3.3 70B), enabling real-time tool invocation without cloud round-trip delays when self-hosted
vs alternatives: Faster function calling dispatch than larger models due to reduced inference latency, and deployable locally unlike cloud-only alternatives, though specific function calling format and capabilities not as mature as Claude or GPT-4o
Generates structured data (JSON, XML, or other formats) that conforms to user-specified schemas, enabling reliable extraction of machine-readable outputs from natural language instructions. Parses schema definitions and constrains generation to valid outputs matching the schema, reducing post-processing and validation overhead. Supports complex nested structures and conditional fields.
Unique: Combines low-latency inference with schema-constrained generation, enabling fast structured data extraction without external validation layers, optimized for production workloads requiring both speed and reliability
vs alternatives: Faster structured output generation than larger models due to architectural efficiency, and deployable locally unlike cloud alternatives, though schema constraint mechanism less mature than specialized extraction tools like Pydantic or JSONSchema validators
Classifies text into predefined categories or analyzes sentiment using transformer-based pattern matching trained on diverse text corpora. Supports multi-class and multi-label classification through natural language prompting or structured output schemas. Optimized for low-latency classification enabling real-time content moderation, intent detection, and sentiment analysis at scale.
Unique: Achieves real-time classification at 150 tokens/second throughput through architectural optimization, enabling sub-second classification latency for production workloads without cloud API dependencies
vs alternatives: Faster classification than larger models and deployable locally unlike cloud alternatives, though may require task-specific fine-tuning for specialized domains where smaller models underperform
+4 more capabilities
Provides a standardized evaluation framework for code generation models that accepts generated code in 17 programming languages (C, C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Python, Ruby, PHP, JavaScript, Perl, Haskell, OCaml, Scala, D, Pascal) and validates correctness through actual execution against unit tests via the ExecEval Docker-based execution engine. Uses a centralized problem definition model with src_uid foreign keys linking generated code to shared problem descriptions and unittest_db.json, enabling consistent evaluation across language variants of the same problem.
Unique: Combines 25M training examples across 7,500 unique problems with an execution-based evaluation pipeline (ExecEval) that actually runs generated code in Docker containers against unit tests, rather than relying on static analysis or string matching. The src_uid linking system creates a normalized data model where problem descriptions and tests are stored once and referenced by all language variants, eliminating duplication and ensuring consistency.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (25M examples vs typical 10-100K) and true execution-based validation across more languages (17 vs 4-6) than HumanEval or CodeXGLUE, with explicit support for code translation and repair tasks beyond generation.
Implements a foreign key linking system where all task-specific datasets (program synthesis, code translation, APR, retrieval) reference shared problem definitions via src_uid identifiers. Problem descriptions and unit tests are stored once in centralized problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json files, then linked by src_uid to avoid duplication. The Hugging Face datasets API automatically resolves these links during data loading, returning enriched DatasetDict objects with problem context pre-joined to task examples.
Unique: Uses a normalized relational data model (src_uid as foreign key) for a code benchmark, treating problem definitions as a separate entity layer rather than embedding them in each task dataset. This is more sophisticated than typical flat-file benchmark structures and enables consistent multi-task evaluation on identical problems.
xCodeEval scores higher at 67/100 vs Mistral Small at 60/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More efficient than duplicating problem descriptions across 7 task datasets (reduces storage by ~30-40%), and enables automatic link resolution via Hugging Face API unlike manual CSV joins in CodeXGLUE or HumanEval variants.
Provides a Python API for loading xCodeEval datasets from Hugging Face Hub (NTU-NLP-sg/xCodeEval) with automatic src_uid-based linking between task datasets and shared problem definitions. The datasets library handles data downloading, caching, and streaming, while the xCodeEval integration automatically joins task examples with problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json using src_uid foreign keys. Returns DatasetDict objects with enriched examples ready for model training or evaluation.
Unique: Integrates xCodeEval with Hugging Face datasets library, providing automatic src_uid resolution and streaming support. Treats data loading as a first-class concern with built-in linking logic, rather than requiring manual JSON parsing.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Git LFS downloads because it handles caching and automatic linking, and integrates seamlessly with Hugging Face training pipelines vs custom data loaders.
Provides an alternative data access method using Git LFS for users who prefer direct file access or need selective dataset downloads. Supports cloning the repository with LFS disabled, then pulling specific task files or problem definitions on demand. Useful for custom processing pipelines or environments where Python/Hugging Face is not available, though requires manual src_uid linking to join task examples with problem definitions.
Unique: Provides Git LFS-based alternative to Hugging Face API, enabling direct file access and selective downloads. Requires manual src_uid linking but offers more control over data access patterns.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Hugging Face API for selective downloads and custom pipelines, but requires more manual work for src_uid linking and lacks automatic caching/streaming.
Implements a standardized three-phase evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) that applies consistently across all 7 tasks (program synthesis, code translation, APR, tag classification, code compilation, NL-code retrieval, code-code retrieval). Phase 1 generates or retrieves code, Phase 2 executes it via ExecEval or computes retrieval metrics, and Phase 3 aggregates results into pass@k, MRR, NDCG, or other task-specific metrics. Enables direct comparison of model performance across tasks.
Unique: Defines a unified three-phase evaluation pipeline that applies to all 7 tasks, treating generation, execution, and metric computation as separate concerns. Enables consistent evaluation methodology across diverse task types (generation, translation, retrieval, classification).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than task-specific evaluation scripts because it provides a unified framework for all 7 tasks, and enables direct comparison of model performance across different task types.
Evaluates code generation models on the program synthesis task by accepting natural language problem descriptions and generating code solutions in any of 17 languages. The evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) runs generated code against unit tests via ExecEval, computing pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.) that measure the probability of finding a correct solution within k samples. Supports both single-solution and multi-sample evaluation modes for assessing model reliability.
Unique: Implements a three-phase evaluation pipeline (Generation → Execution → Metrics) with explicit pass@k computation that measures the probability of finding a correct solution within k attempts, rather than just binary pass/fail. Supports multi-sample evaluation across 17 languages with language-specific compiler configurations and timeout handling.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than HumanEval's simple pass@k because it handles language-specific compilation errors and timeouts explicitly, and scales to 25M training examples vs HumanEval's 164 problems.
Evaluates code translation models by accepting source code in one language and generated translations in a target language, then validating functional equivalence through execution against shared unit tests. The translation evaluation pipeline compiles and executes both source and translated code against the same unittest_db.json test cases, comparing outputs to detect translation errors. Supports all 17 language pairs (though not all pairs may have training data) and uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle syntax differences.
Unique: Validates code translation by executing both source and target code against identical unit tests and comparing outputs, ensuring functional equivalence rather than syntactic similarity. Uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle the complexity of 17 different compilation environments and their idiosyncrasies.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than BLEU-score-based translation metrics because it validates actual functional correctness through execution, and covers more language pairs (17 vs typical 2-4) with explicit compiler integration.
Evaluates program repair models by providing buggy code snippets and expecting corrected versions that pass unit tests. The APR evaluation pipeline executes repaired code against unittest_db.json test cases, measuring whether the repair successfully fixes the bug without introducing new failures. Supports repairs across all 17 languages and uses the same execution-based validation as program synthesis, enabling direct comparison of repair quality.
Unique: Treats program repair as an executable task where success is measured by unit test passage, rather than syntactic similarity to reference repairs. Integrates with the same ExecEval pipeline as program synthesis, enabling direct performance comparison between generation and repair models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional APR benchmarks (Defects4J, QuixBugs) because it covers 17 languages and 7,500 problems vs 395 Java bugs, and uses consistent execution-based metrics across all repair types.
+5 more capabilities