| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.50e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains conversation state across multiple turns using a transformer-based attention mechanism that tracks dialogue history and builds contextual understanding. The model processes full conversation context (not just the latest message) through its 128K token context window, enabling coherent multi-step reasoning and reference resolution across extended exchanges. Built on a dense transformer architecture optimized for real-world productivity workflows.
Unique: Trained specifically on diverse real-world digital working environments (not just web text), enabling superior understanding of productivity workflows, development contexts, and complex task decomposition compared to general-purpose models
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-3.5 and Claude 3 Haiku on coding tasks and real-world productivity scenarios due to specialized training on working environments, while maintaining lower latency than larger models
Generates syntactically correct, contextually appropriate code across 40+ programming languages using transformer-based code understanding trained on diverse real-world codebases. The model leverages its M2.1 coding expertise foundation to produce production-ready code snippets, full functions, or multi-file solutions. Supports completion from partial code, generation from natural language specifications, and context-aware suggestions based on surrounding code patterns.
Unique: Builds on M2.1's specialized coding training with expanded real-world working environment context, enabling generation of code that fits actual development workflows (including error handling, logging, configuration patterns) rather than isolated snippets
vs alternatives: Generates more production-ready code than Copilot for non-mainstream languages and specialized frameworks due to broader training on real working environments, with comparable speed to Copilot but lower API costs
Engages in multi-turn dialogue to solve complex problems through iterative refinement, asking clarifying questions and building understanding progressively. The model maintains problem context across turns, identifies ambiguities, and suggests alternative approaches. Supports Socratic dialogue patterns where the model guides users toward solutions rather than providing direct answers.
Unique: Trained on real-world problem-solving interactions in working environments, enabling dialogue patterns that match how experienced engineers actually think through complex problems
vs alternatives: More effective for complex problem-solving than single-turn Q&A models, with reasoning comparable to human mentorship but available instantly; better at identifying ambiguities than direct-answer systems
Analyzes code to identify bugs, performance issues, and anti-patterns using semantic understanding of code structure and execution flow. The model processes code context (function, class, or file level) and produces targeted debugging suggestions with specific line numbers and root cause analysis. Supports multiple debugging paradigms: identifying null pointer risks, logic errors, resource leaks, and suggesting fixes with explanations of why the issue occurs.
Unique: Trained on real-world debugging scenarios and error patterns from production codebases, enabling identification of subtle bugs that static analysis tools miss (e.g., race conditions, resource leaks in specific patterns)
vs alternatives: Provides more contextual debugging explanations than ESLint or Pylint, with reasoning about why bugs occur; faster feedback loop than human code review but requires less setup than IDE-integrated debuggers
Generates comprehensive technical documentation from code by analyzing function signatures, control flow, and implementation patterns to produce accurate docstrings, API documentation, and architectural explanations. The model produces documentation in multiple formats (Markdown, reStructuredText, JSDoc, Javadoc) and can explain complex code sections in plain language. Uses semantic understanding of code intent to generate documentation that matches actual behavior rather than generic templates.
Unique: Generates documentation that reflects actual code behavior and real-world usage patterns from training data, rather than generic templates, producing documentation that developers find immediately useful
vs alternatives: Produces more contextually accurate documentation than template-based tools like Sphinx or Doxygen, with natural language explanations comparable to human-written docs but generated in seconds
Extracts structured information from unstructured text using semantic understanding and pattern recognition, producing JSON, CSV, or database-ready formats. The model parses natural language descriptions, requirements, or documentation to extract entities, relationships, and attributes. Supports schema-guided extraction where a target schema is provided, enabling high-fidelity data extraction for knowledge base population, data migration, or form automation.
Unique: Trained on real-world working environments including actual business documents and workflows, enabling extraction of domain-specific entities and relationships that generic NLP models miss
vs alternatives: Produces more accurate extraction than regex-based or rule-based systems for complex, varied text; faster and cheaper than hiring data entry contractors, with comparable accuracy to fine-tuned domain-specific models
Breaks down complex, multi-step tasks into actionable subtasks with dependencies, sequencing, and resource requirements using chain-of-thought reasoning. The model analyzes a high-level goal and produces a structured plan including task ordering, estimated effort, potential blockers, and success criteria. Supports iterative refinement where plans can be adjusted based on feedback or new constraints.
Unique: Trained on real-world project execution patterns from diverse working environments, enabling decomposition that reflects actual development workflows, dependencies, and common pitfalls rather than idealized project structures
vs alternatives: Produces more realistic task breakdowns than generic project templates, with reasoning about dependencies and risks; faster than manual planning but requires human validation for accuracy
Generates high-quality written content for technical and business contexts including blog posts, technical specifications, proposals, and communication templates. The model produces content that matches specified tone, audience level, and format requirements. Supports content adaptation (e.g., converting technical documentation to executive summaries) and multi-format generation (Markdown, HTML, PDF-ready text).
Unique: Trained on real-world business and technical communication from diverse working environments, enabling generation of content that matches actual professional standards and audience expectations
vs alternatives: Produces more contextually appropriate content than GPT-3.5 for technical audiences, with better understanding of technical concepts; faster than human writing but requires editorial review for accuracy and brand consistency
+3 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities