| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.55e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates production-ready code across multiple programming languages by combining 10B activated parameters with chain-of-thought reasoning patterns optimized for multi-step coding tasks. The model uses a mixture-of-experts architecture (230B total parameters, 10B active) to route coding queries through specialized expert pathways, enabling context-aware code synthesis that maintains state across agent iterations without requiring external memory systems.
Unique: Uses selective activation of 10B parameters from a 230B mixture-of-experts pool specifically tuned for coding and agentic tasks, reducing inference latency while maintaining near-frontier code quality through expert routing rather than full-model inference
vs alternatives: More efficient than full-scale frontier models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5) for code generation while maintaining competitive quality through specialized expert routing; faster inference than dense 70B models due to sparse activation
Performs multi-step reasoning across diverse domains (math, logic, knowledge retrieval) using chain-of-thought decomposition patterns embedded in the model weights. The architecture supports both free-form reasoning and structured output generation through prompt-based formatting, enabling downstream systems to parse model outputs as JSON, YAML, or other structured formats without requiring external parsing layers.
Unique: Embeds chain-of-thought reasoning patterns directly in model weights through training on reasoning-heavy datasets, enabling multi-step decomposition without requiring external prompting frameworks or specialized reasoning APIs
vs alternatives: Delivers reasoning capabilities at 10B active parameters comparable to 70B dense models through expert routing, reducing inference cost by 60-70% while maintaining structured output compatibility
Supports multi-turn conversational state management and function-calling patterns through OpenRouter's API interface, enabling agents to maintain context across sequential API calls and invoke external tools via structured function schemas. The model integrates with standard function-calling conventions (OpenAI-compatible format) to enable tool use without custom integration code, routing function calls through the sparse expert network for efficient decision-making.
Unique: Implements function-calling through OpenAI-compatible API contracts, enabling drop-in replacement of frontier models in existing agentic frameworks while reducing inference cost through sparse expert activation
vs alternatives: Maintains OpenAI function-calling API compatibility while operating at 10B active parameters, enabling cost-efficient agent deployment without rewriting tool-calling logic
Achieves near-frontier model performance through mixture-of-experts architecture that selectively activates 10 billion parameters from a 230 billion parameter pool based on input tokens. The routing mechanism learns to direct different input types (code, reasoning, general text) to specialized expert subnetworks, reducing per-token computation and memory requirements compared to dense models while maintaining output quality through expert specialization.
Unique: Implements conditional computation through expert routing that activates only 10B of 230B parameters per token, reducing inference cost and latency compared to dense models while maintaining competitive output quality through specialized expert pathways
vs alternatives: Achieves 60-70% inference cost reduction vs 70B dense models while maintaining comparable quality through expert specialization; more efficient than full-scale frontier models (GPT-4, Claude) for cost-sensitive production deployments
Generates and understands code across 10+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, etc.) through language-agnostic token representations and cross-language training data. The model learns syntactic and semantic patterns common across languages, enabling code translation, cross-language refactoring, and polyglot project understanding without language-specific fine-tuning.
Unique: Trained on balanced multi-language corpora with language-agnostic token representations, enabling code generation and translation across 10+ languages without language-specific model variants or fine-tuning
vs alternatives: Supports broader language coverage than specialized code models (Codex, StarCoder) while maintaining single-model efficiency; more practical than language-specific models for polyglot teams
Completes code by understanding surrounding context, including function signatures, variable types, and project patterns, through attention mechanisms that weight nearby tokens and learned code structure patterns. The model uses implicit codebase understanding (learned from training data) rather than explicit indexing, enabling completion without external code search or AST parsing infrastructure.
Unique: Achieves context-aware completion through learned code structure patterns and attention mechanisms without requiring external codebase indexing or AST parsing, reducing infrastructure complexity while maintaining competitive suggestion quality
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than Copilot (no codebase indexing required) while maintaining context awareness; faster than tree-sitter-based approaches due to learned patterns vs explicit parsing
Maintains conversation context across multiple turns through stateful API interactions, where each turn includes full conversation history as input context. The model uses transformer attention to weight recent messages more heavily than distant history, enabling coherent multi-turn dialogue without explicit memory systems or external state stores.
Unique: Implements multi-turn memory through full conversation history inclusion in each API call with learned attention weighting, enabling stateless deployment without external memory systems while maintaining conversation coherence
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than systems requiring persistent memory stores; comparable coherence to frontier models while operating at 10B active parameters
Follows complex instructions and system prompts through learned instruction-following patterns developed during training on instruction-tuned datasets. The model interprets system-level directives (tone, format, constraints) and applies them consistently across responses, enabling role-playing, output formatting, and behavioral customization without model fine-tuning.
Unique: Implements instruction-following through learned patterns from instruction-tuned training data, enabling behavioral customization via prompts without model fine-tuning or external control mechanisms
vs alternatives: Comparable instruction-following to frontier models while operating at 10B active parameters; more flexible than fixed-behavior models but less controllable than fine-tuned variants
+2 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2 at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training