| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $6.20e-7 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes multi-turn conversations using a transformer-based architecture trained on instruction-following datasets, maintaining context across dialogue turns through attention mechanisms over the full conversation history. Implements chain-of-thought reasoning patterns to decompose complex queries into intermediate reasoning steps before generating final responses, enabling coherent multi-step problem solving within a single conversation thread.
Unique: Trained on Microsoft's Wizard instruction-following datasets which emphasize complex reasoning and multi-step problem decomposition; uses mixture-of-experts (8x22B) architecture to route different reasoning types through specialized expert pathways, enabling more nuanced handling of diverse task types compared to dense models
vs alternatives: Outperforms open-source alternatives on instruction-following benchmarks while maintaining competitive performance with proprietary models like GPT-4, with the advantage of being accessible via standard API without vendor lock-in
Generates syntactically correct code across multiple programming languages by leveraging training on large code corpora and instruction-tuning for code-specific tasks. Produces not just code but accompanying explanations of logic, architectural patterns, and implementation choices. Uses attention mechanisms to understand code context and generate contextually appropriate completions that follow language idioms and best practices.
Unique: Instruction-tuned specifically for code tasks through Wizard training methodology, enabling it to generate not just functional code but well-documented, idiomatic implementations with explicit reasoning about design choices; mixture-of-experts routing allows specialized handling of different programming paradigms
vs alternatives: Produces more readable and documented code than base models while maintaining competitive quality with specialized code models like Codex, with the advantage of being openly available and not restricted to specific languages or frameworks
Answers factual and analytical questions by synthesizing information from its training data and applying multi-step reasoning to arrive at well-justified answers. Implements reasoning-before-response patterns where the model explicitly works through the logic of a question before stating conclusions. Supports both factual recall and analytical reasoning tasks, with the ability to acknowledge uncertainty and explain the basis for answers.
Unique: Trained with instruction-following on reasoning-heavy datasets that emphasize explicit working-through of complex questions; mixture-of-experts architecture allows different expert pathways for factual vs. analytical reasoning, improving accuracy across diverse question types
vs alternatives: Demonstrates stronger reasoning transparency and multi-step problem solving than many open models while maintaining competitive accuracy with proprietary models, with explicit training for acknowledging uncertainty rather than confident hallucination
Generates diverse written content from creative fiction to technical documentation by leveraging instruction-tuning on varied writing styles and domains. Adapts tone, formality, and structure based on implicit or explicit instructions about the target audience and purpose. Uses attention over writing conventions and stylistic patterns to maintain consistency within generated documents and match specified writing styles.
Unique: Instruction-tuned across diverse writing domains through Wizard training, enabling style adaptation and tone control that goes beyond simple template filling; mixture-of-experts routing allows specialized handling of technical vs. creative writing tasks
vs alternatives: Produces more stylistically consistent and domain-appropriate content than general-purpose models while being more flexible than specialized writing models, with the advantage of handling both technical and creative tasks in a single model
Solves logical puzzles, mathematical problems, and constraint satisfaction tasks by applying structured reasoning patterns and symbolic manipulation. Implements step-by-step logical deduction where the model explicitly works through logical implications and constraints before arriving at conclusions. Handles problems requiring tracking multiple constraints and reasoning about their interactions.
Unique: Trained with explicit instruction-following on reasoning-heavy datasets that emphasize logical step-by-step working; mixture-of-experts architecture routes logical reasoning tasks through specialized expert pathways optimized for symbolic manipulation and constraint tracking
vs alternatives: Demonstrates stronger explicit reasoning transparency and multi-step logical deduction than general models while maintaining competitive performance with specialized reasoning models, with the advantage of handling diverse reasoning types in a single model
Supports structured function calling and API integration by understanding function schemas and generating appropriately formatted function calls. Parses function definitions, understands parameter requirements and types, and generates valid function call syntax that can be executed by external systems. Enables chaining multiple function calls to accomplish complex tasks that require interaction with external tools or APIs.
Unique: Instruction-tuned for function calling through Wizard training on tool-use datasets; mixture-of-experts routing allows specialized handling of function schema understanding and parameter generation, improving accuracy of generated function calls
vs alternatives: Provides reliable function calling without requiring proprietary function-calling APIs, enabling integration with any external system via standard function definitions, while maintaining competitive accuracy with specialized function-calling models
Processes and generates text in multiple languages with understanding of language-specific grammar, idioms, and cultural context. Implements cross-lingual transfer learning where knowledge from high-resource languages improves performance on lower-resource languages. Supports code-switching and maintains language consistency within generated text while respecting language-specific conventions.
Unique: Trained on diverse multilingual instruction-following datasets through Wizard methodology, enabling language-aware generation that respects language-specific conventions; mixture-of-experts architecture may route language-specific processing through specialized experts
vs alternatives: Handles multilingual tasks in a single model without requiring separate language-specific models, with instruction-following enabling better control over language choice and translation style compared to base multilingual models
Generates responses while respecting safety guidelines and refusing to engage with harmful requests. Implements safety filtering through training on instruction-following datasets that include examples of appropriate refusals and boundary-setting. Distinguishes between legitimate requests for sensitive information (e.g., educational content about security) and genuinely harmful requests, enabling nuanced safety without over-censoring.
Unique: Instruction-tuned for nuanced safety through Wizard training on datasets that distinguish between harmful and legitimate sensitive requests; enables context-aware refusals that explain reasoning rather than silent blocking
vs alternatives: Provides more nuanced safety decisions than rule-based filtering while maintaining better transparency than black-box safety mechanisms, with explicit training for explaining refusals rather than just blocking requests
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs WizardLM-2 8x22B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities