MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.80e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Classifies both text and image inputs against a taxonomy of unsafe content categories (violence, sexual content, hate speech, etc.) using a fine-tuned Llama 4 Scout backbone with multimodal encoders. The model processes inputs through separate text and vision pathways, then aggregates representations to produce safety risk scores and category labels. Built on instruction-tuned safety classification patterns established in Llama Guard 3, extended with visual understanding for detecting unsafe imagery.
Unique: First Llama Guard iteration with native multimodal (text + image) safety classification using a unified Llama 4 Scout backbone, rather than separate text-only classifiers or vision models bolted together. Extends instruction-tuned safety taxonomy from Llama Guard 3 with visual understanding for detecting unsafe imagery without requiring separate image classifiers.
vs alternatives: Handles text and image safety in a single model call with shared semantic understanding, whereas alternatives like OpenAI Moderation API (text-only) or separate image classifiers require multiple API calls and lose cross-modal context.
Maps input content to a predefined taxonomy of unsafe categories (violence, sexual content, hate speech, illegal activities, etc.) using instruction-tuned classification. The model was fine-tuned on safety-labeled datasets to recognize nuanced violations within each category, producing granular category-level confidence scores rather than binary safe/unsafe decisions. Supports hierarchical reasoning about content severity across multiple harm dimensions simultaneously.
Unique: Uses instruction-tuned fine-tuning on safety-labeled data to produce multi-dimensional category scores in a single forward pass, rather than training separate binary classifiers per category or using rule-based heuristics. Inherits Llama Guard 3's taxonomy design but extends it with visual understanding.
vs alternatives: Provides granular per-category scores in one API call, enabling policy-based routing, whereas binary classifiers (safe/unsafe) require downstream logic to determine which violation type occurred, and rule-based systems are brittle to paraphrasing.
Applies instruction-following capabilities from the Llama 4 Scout base model to safety classification tasks, enabling the model to understand nuanced safety instructions and apply them consistently. The fine-tuning process teaches the model to reason about context, intent, and harm potential rather than matching keywords. This allows classification of subtle violations (e.g., veiled threats, coded hate speech) that simple pattern matching would miss.
Unique: Leverages instruction-tuned capabilities from Llama 4 Scout to perform contextual reasoning about safety violations, rather than relying on keyword matching or shallow pattern recognition. Fine-tuning teaches the model to understand intent, context, and nuance in safety classification.
vs alternatives: Detects obfuscated or contextually-dependent violations that keyword-based systems miss, and maintains consistency across paraphrases, whereas rule-based classifiers require exhaustive enumeration of violation patterns and fail on novel phrasings.
Exposes safety classification through OpenRouter's API, enabling batch processing of content at scale without managing inference infrastructure. Requests are routed through OpenRouter's load-balanced endpoints, supporting concurrent classification of multiple text/image inputs. The API abstracts away model serving complexity, providing a simple HTTP interface with standard request/response formats.
Unique: Provides managed API access to Llama Guard 4 through OpenRouter's infrastructure, eliminating the need for self-hosted deployment while maintaining multimodal safety classification capabilities. Abstracts model serving, scaling, and versioning complexity behind a simple HTTP interface.
vs alternatives: Eliminates infrastructure management burden compared to self-hosted deployment, and provides built-in scaling/reliability, whereas self-hosting requires GPU procurement, model optimization, and operational overhead.
Processes images through a vision encoder integrated into the Llama 4 Scout backbone to detect unsafe visual content (violence, sexual imagery, hate symbols, etc.). The vision pathway extracts visual features that are then fused with text embeddings for joint classification. This enables detection of unsafe imagery even without accompanying text, and allows the model to understand visual context when classifying text+image pairs together.
Unique: Integrates vision encoding directly into the Llama Guard 4 architecture for end-to-end multimodal safety classification, rather than using separate image classifiers or post-hoc fusion of text and image scores. Enables joint reasoning about image+text pairs with shared semantic understanding.
vs alternatives: Classifies images and text together in a single model with shared context, whereas separate classifiers (e.g., CLIP for images + text classifier) require multiple API calls and lose cross-modal reasoning about hateful memes or context-dependent visual harms.
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B at 21/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities