Nous: Hermes 4 70B ranks higher at 24/100 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Nous: Hermes 4 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-7 per prompt token | $1.30e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates coherent, contextually appropriate text responses across 8+ languages using a 70B parameter transformer architecture with instruction-tuning applied post-pretraining. The model uses standard causal language modeling with attention mechanisms optimized for long-context reasoning, enabling it to follow complex multi-step instructions and maintain semantic consistency across diverse linguistic domains without language-specific fine-tuning branches.
Unique: 70B parameter scale with explicit instruction-tuning applied post-pretraining enables stronger instruction-following than base models of equivalent size; multilingual training data integrated during pretraining rather than as separate language-specific adapters, reducing inference latency and model complexity
vs alternatives: Larger instruction-tuned model than Llama 2 70B with improved multilingual coverage; more cost-effective than GPT-4 for instruction-following tasks while maintaining competitive quality on reasoning benchmarks
Leverages transformer attention mechanisms to learn task patterns from 2-8 examples provided in the prompt context, enabling zero-shot and few-shot task adaptation without retraining. The model applies implicit chain-of-thought reasoning by generating intermediate reasoning steps when prompted with structured examples, using learned patterns from instruction-tuning to decompose complex problems into solvable sub-tasks.
Unique: Instruction-tuning specifically optimized for following example-based task specifications; attention mechanisms trained to recognize and generalize from demonstration patterns, enabling more reliable few-shot performance than base models without explicit few-shot training objectives
vs alternatives: More reliable few-shot learning than Llama 2 due to instruction-tuning; comparable to GPT-3.5 on few-shot benchmarks but with lower API costs and local deployment option
Generates syntactically correct code across 15+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, Go, Rust, etc.) using transformer-based code understanding learned from diverse code corpora. The model produces code with contextual awareness of language idioms, standard libraries, and common patterns; it also explains existing code by decomposing logic into natural language descriptions, leveraging instruction-tuning to balance code accuracy with readability.
Unique: Language-agnostic code understanding trained on diverse polyglot corpora enables consistent quality across 15+ languages without language-specific model variants; instruction-tuning includes explicit code explanation and refactoring tasks, improving code readability and documentation quality beyond raw generation
vs alternatives: Comparable code generation quality to Copilot for common languages; lower cost than GitHub Copilot Pro while supporting broader language coverage; better code explanation capabilities than base GPT-3.5 due to instruction-tuning
Extracts structured information from unstructured text and generates JSON outputs conforming to user-specified schemas through instruction-tuning that emphasizes format adherence. The model uses attention mechanisms to identify relevant entities and relationships, then formats output according to schema constraints provided in the prompt; it can validate against simple schema rules (required fields, data types) through learned patterns without external validation libraries.
Unique: Instruction-tuning includes explicit structured output tasks with schema examples, enabling the model to learn format constraints through demonstration rather than relying solely on prompt engineering; attention mechanisms trained to balance information extraction with format adherence
vs alternatives: More flexible than rule-based extraction systems for schema variations; lower hallucination rate than smaller models due to 70B parameter scale; requires less post-processing than GPT-3.5 for simple-to-moderate schemas
Maintains coherent dialogue across multiple conversation turns by processing the full conversation history as context, using transformer self-attention to track entity references, pronouns, and topic continuity. The model applies instruction-tuning patterns for conversational roles (system, user, assistant) to generate contextually appropriate responses that reference previous statements, ask clarifying questions, and maintain consistent personality or tone across turns without explicit state management.
Unique: Instruction-tuning explicitly includes multi-turn conversation examples with role markers, enabling the model to learn conversational patterns and context tracking without external dialogue state management; transformer architecture naturally handles variable-length conversation histories through attention mechanisms
vs alternatives: Comparable multi-turn performance to GPT-3.5 with lower API costs; better context tracking than Llama 2 70B due to instruction-tuning on conversation datasets; no external session storage required unlike some specialized dialogue systems
Applies domain-specific knowledge by incorporating specialized terminology, concepts, and reasoning patterns provided in system prompts or context sections, enabling the model to generate domain-appropriate responses without fine-tuning. The model uses attention mechanisms to weight domain-specific context heavily in generation, applying learned instruction-following patterns to prioritize provided domain knowledge over general training data when conflicts arise.
Unique: Instruction-tuning enables reliable prioritization of provided context over general training knowledge; attention mechanisms can be implicitly guided through prompt structure to weight domain-specific information heavily without explicit fine-tuning
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than fine-tuning for domain adaptation; faster iteration than retraining; comparable domain-specific performance to fine-tuned smaller models due to 70B parameter scale and instruction-tuning quality
Generates original creative content (stories, marketing copy, poetry, dialogue) in specified styles and tones using learned patterns from diverse writing corpora combined with instruction-tuning for style adherence. The model applies attention mechanisms to maintain stylistic consistency across longer outputs, using system prompts to establish voice, tone, and genre constraints that guide generation without explicit style transfer mechanisms.
Unique: Instruction-tuning includes explicit style and tone examples, enabling the model to learn stylistic patterns and apply them consistently; 70B parameter scale provides sufficient capacity for nuanced style variation without fine-tuning
vs alternatives: Better style consistency than GPT-3.5 for marketing copy due to instruction-tuning; more creative variation than smaller models; comparable to specialized creative writing tools but with broader capability range
Generates clear technical documentation, API references, and code explanations by applying learned patterns for technical writing clarity, structure, and completeness. The model uses instruction-tuning to produce well-organized documentation with appropriate section hierarchies, code examples, and explanatory prose; it can generate documentation from code signatures, requirements, or existing documentation patterns without external documentation generation tools.
Unique: Instruction-tuning includes technical writing examples emphasizing clarity, structure, and completeness; model learns to generate documentation with appropriate section hierarchies and example code without explicit documentation templates
vs alternatives: More flexible than template-based documentation generators; produces more readable documentation than code-to-doc tools relying on simple parsing; comparable quality to human-written documentation for straightforward APIs
+1 more capabilities
Dynamically switches between fast-inference and extended-reasoning modes during generation, allowing the model to allocate computational budget based on query complexity. The model learns to route simple queries through direct generation paths while complex reasoning tasks trigger iterative chain-of-thought processing, implemented via a learned gating mechanism that predicts reasoning necessity before token generation begins.
Unique: Implements learned gating mechanism for automatic reasoning mode selection rather than fixed routing rules or user-specified flags, enabling the model to discover optimal reasoning allocation patterns during training on diverse task distributions
vs alternatives: More efficient than standard chain-of-thought models (which always reason) and more capable than fast-only models (which never reason) by learning when reasoning is actually necessary
Generates multi-step reasoning chains with explicit intermediate steps, leveraging the 70B parameter scale to maintain coherence across long reasoning sequences. When activated, the model produces verbose step-by-step explanations with intermediate conclusions, implemented via training on synthetic reasoning datasets and reinforced through process-reward modeling to prefer logically sound intermediate steps.
Unique: Combines 70B parameter scale with process-reward modeling to maintain reasoning coherence across 10+ step chains, whereas smaller models typically degrade after 3-4 steps due to context drift and accumulated errors
vs alternatives: Produces more reliable multi-step reasoning than GPT-3.5 while being more cost-effective than GPT-4 for reasoning tasks, with explicit step visibility that proprietary models don't expose
Nous: Hermes 4 70B scores higher at 24/100 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Answers factual and reasoning-based questions by retrieving relevant knowledge and applying logical deduction. The model combines pattern matching from training data with reasoning chains to synthesize answers, particularly effective when questions require multi-step inference or combining information from multiple domains.
Unique: Combines dense knowledge from 70B parameters with learned reasoning patterns, enabling both factual recall and multi-step inference without requiring external knowledge bases for simple questions
vs alternatives: More self-contained than RAG-based systems for general knowledge questions; stronger reasoning than GPT-3.5 for complex multi-step problems
Analyzes sentiment and extracts opinions from text, classifying emotional tone and identifying specific viewpoints or attitudes. The model recognizes sentiment markers (words, phrases, context) and generates structured sentiment labels (positive/negative/neutral) with confidence scores and supporting evidence.
Unique: Uses contextual understanding from 70B parameters to recognize sentiment in complex linguistic contexts (sarcasm, negation, mixed opinions) rather than relying on keyword matching or shallow pattern recognition
vs alternatives: More nuanced than rule-based sentiment tools; comparable to fine-tuned BERT models but with better handling of complex linguistic phenomena
Identifies and extracts named entities (people, organizations, locations, dates, etc.) from text, classifying them into semantic categories. The model recognizes entity boundaries and types through learned patterns from training data, generating structured output with entity spans and classifications.
Unique: Uses contextual embeddings from 70B parameters to disambiguate entity boundaries and types based on surrounding context, rather than relying on gazetteer matching or shallow pattern recognition
vs alternatives: More accurate than spaCy NER for complex entity types; comparable to fine-tuned BERT models but with better generalization to unseen entity types
Identifies potentially harmful, inappropriate, or policy-violating content including hate speech, violence, adult content, and misinformation. The model applies learned safety patterns to classify content risk levels and flag problematic material, implemented through instruction-tuning on safety datasets and reinforcement learning from human feedback on safety preferences.
Unique: Trained on diverse safety datasets with RLHF to recognize context-dependent harms (e.g., discussing violence in historical context vs. inciting violence), rather than simple keyword matching or rule-based filtering
vs alternatives: More context-aware than keyword-based filters; comparable to OpenAI's moderation API but with lower latency and no external API dependency
Executes complex multi-part instructions with precise output formatting, using instruction-tuning techniques to reliably parse structured prompts and generate outputs matching specified schemas. The model was trained on diverse instruction datasets with explicit format specifications, enabling it to follow JSON schemas, XML structures, markdown formatting, and code block requirements with high consistency.
Unique: Instruction-tuned on 70B scale with explicit format examples in training data, enabling reliable multi-format output without requiring external grammar constraints or post-processing validation layers
vs alternatives: More reliable at format compliance than base Llama 3.1 70B while avoiding the latency overhead of constrained decoding libraries like outlines or guidance
Generates syntactically correct code across 20+ programming languages and performs refactoring tasks like optimization, style conversion, and bug fixing. Built on Llama 3.1's code training, enhanced with instruction-tuning for code-specific tasks, the model maintains language-specific idioms and best practices through learned patterns from diverse codebases.
Unique: 70B parameter scale enables context-aware code generation that tracks variable types and function signatures across 4K+ token contexts, whereas smaller models lose type information after ~1K tokens
vs alternatives: Comparable to Copilot for single-file generation but stronger at multi-file refactoring due to larger context window; more cost-effective than Claude for routine code tasks
+6 more capabilities