| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Intercepts and captures raw MCP (Model Context Protocol) messages flowing between clients and servers using network-level packet sniffing or protocol-aware middleware injection. Parses binary/JSON MCP frames to extract request/response pairs, message types, and payload contents without requiring application-level instrumentation or code modifications.
Unique: Purpose-built for MCP protocol specifically rather than generic network sniffing — understands MCP frame structure, message types, and request-response correlation patterns natively, enabling semantic-level traffic analysis instead of raw packet dumps
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic Wireshark for MCP debugging because it automatically parses MCP semantics and correlates request-response pairs, whereas Wireshark requires manual frame reassembly and protocol dissector configuration
Measures end-to-end latency for individual MCP requests, identifies bottlenecks in message round-trip time, and generates latency distribution histograms. Correlates timing data with message type, payload size, and server response time to pinpoint whether delays originate from network, serialization, or server processing.
Unique: Provides MCP-specific latency analysis that correlates timing with protocol-level semantics (message type, resource type, operation) rather than generic network latency metrics, enabling targeted optimization of MCP implementations
vs alternatives: More granular than generic APM tools because it understands MCP message structure and can attribute latency to specific protocol operations, whereas APM tools treat MCP as opaque network traffic
Extracts and displays the full content of MCP request and response payloads, validates payloads against MCP schema specifications, and highlights malformed or unexpected messages. Supports JSON pretty-printing, binary payload decoding, and schema-aware validation to catch protocol violations early.
Unique: MCP-aware payload validation that understands protocol semantics and can validate against official MCP schema specifications, rather than generic JSON validation that cannot catch protocol-level violations
vs alternatives: More effective than manual payload inspection because it automatically validates against schema and highlights violations, whereas raw Wireshark output requires manual comparison against specification
Filters captured MCP traffic by message type (e.g., resource_list, read, call), resource name, operation, or other metadata criteria. Supports regex and semantic search to find specific messages within large traffic captures, enabling focused analysis of relevant protocol interactions.
Unique: Semantic filtering aware of MCP message structure (resource types, operation names, status codes) rather than generic text search, enabling queries like 'all failed read operations on resource X' without regex complexity
vs alternatives: More intuitive than grep/regex filtering because it understands MCP semantics and provides structured query syntax, whereas raw text search requires knowledge of exact message format
Aggregates traffic data to compute statistics: message frequency by type, resource access patterns, error rates, payload size distributions, and server response time percentiles. Generates summary reports and visualizations showing MCP usage trends and anomalies over time windows.
Unique: MCP-specific analytics that aggregates by protocol-level dimensions (message type, resource, operation) rather than generic network statistics, providing actionable insights into MCP usage patterns
vs alternatives: More relevant than generic network analytics because it understands MCP semantics and can report on resource access patterns and operation frequencies, whereas network tools only see byte counts and packet rates
Identifies and categorizes MCP error responses, exceptions, and protocol violations in captured traffic. Correlates errors with preceding requests to establish cause-effect relationships, and generates error reports with frequency analysis and root cause suggestions.
Unique: MCP-aware error tracking that understands protocol error semantics and correlates errors with preceding requests to establish causality, rather than generic error logging that treats errors as isolated events
vs alternatives: More diagnostic than generic error logs because it correlates errors with requests and suggests root causes based on MCP protocol patterns, whereas raw logs require manual investigation
Exports captured MCP traffic in multiple formats (JSON, CSV, pcap, HAR-like format) for use in external tools, analysis platforms, or sharing with team members. Supports filtering during export to include only relevant messages and redaction of sensitive data.
Unique: MCP-aware export that preserves protocol semantics during format conversion and provides MCP-specific redaction rules, rather than generic data export that treats MCP as opaque binary data
vs alternatives: More flexible than manual export because it supports multiple formats and automated redaction, whereas manual extraction requires custom scripts for each target format
Monitors live MCP traffic streams in real-time, detects anomalies or policy violations, and triggers alerts based on configurable rules (e.g., error rate threshold, latency spike, unusual resource access). Provides dashboard view of current traffic and alert history.
Unique: MCP-specific real-time monitoring that understands protocol semantics and can alert on MCP-level anomalies (error rate by operation type, latency by resource), rather than generic network monitoring that only sees packet rates
vs alternatives: More actionable than generic APM alerts because it can correlate anomalies with specific MCP operations and resources, whereas generic tools require manual correlation of network metrics to application behavior
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs MCP Traffic Analysis Tool at 32/100. MCP Traffic Analysis Tool leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities