| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes targeted queries against the OmniFocus database through AppleScript/JXA automation, supporting field selection, filtering predicates, and sorting parameters to retrieve specific task subsets without full database export. The query_omnifocus tool implements a schema-based filtering interface that translates LLM parameters into AppleScript queries, enabling efficient retrieval of tasks by status, project, due date, and custom metadata without loading the entire database into context.
Unique: Implements query-time field selection and predicate-based filtering through AppleScript, avoiding full database export overhead that competitors like REST API wrappers would incur. Uses MCP schema validation to translate natural language filter parameters into AppleScript predicates, enabling LLMs to construct efficient queries without understanding AppleScript syntax.
vs alternatives: More efficient than dump_database for selective queries (avoids context bloat) and more flexible than static REST endpoints by supporting dynamic filter composition through MCP schema parameters.
Exports the entire OmniFocus database as a structured JSON snapshot through AppleScript automation, providing comprehensive access to all tasks, projects, folders, and metadata for holistic analysis or context-aware reasoning. The dump_database tool serializes the complete OmniFocus object hierarchy (projects, tasks, contexts, perspectives) into a single JSON payload, enabling LLMs to perform cross-cutting analysis, dependency detection, or full-system optimization in a single context window.
Unique: Provides complete OmniFocus state serialization through MCP, enabling LLMs to access the full task hierarchy in a single call rather than requiring multiple incremental queries. Uses AppleScript object traversal to recursively serialize nested project/task structures with all metadata (notes, due dates, custom fields, tags, completion status).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than query_omnifocus for holistic analysis, but trades latency and context efficiency for completeness; better than manual OmniFocus export because it's programmatic and integrates directly into LLM reasoning loops.
Validates tool parameters against JSON schemas before execution, ensuring MCP protocol compliance and preventing invalid requests from reaching AppleScript execution. Each tool defines a schema that specifies required/optional parameters, types, and constraints (e.g., ISO 8601 date format, valid project names), and the MCP server validates incoming requests against these schemas before invoking handlers. This approach provides early error detection, clear error messages to LLM clients, and prevents malformed AppleScript commands from being generated.
Unique: Implements schema-based parameter validation at the MCP protocol level, leveraging the @modelcontextprotocol/sdk's built-in validation to ensure all tool requests conform to defined schemas before execution. Uses JSON schema definitions embedded in tool handlers to specify parameter constraints and provide clear error messages.
vs alternatives: More robust than runtime parameter checking and provides earlier error detection than AppleScript-level validation; differs from REST API frameworks by integrating validation into the MCP protocol layer, ensuring consistency across all tools.
Creates individual tasks in OmniFocus through AppleScript automation, accepting natural language task names and optional structured metadata (project assignment, due dates, tags, notes, priority flags) via MCP schema parameters. The add_omnifocus_task tool translates LLM-generated task specifications into AppleScript commands that instantiate new task objects with full metadata binding, enabling AI assistants to create tasks with context-aware properties without requiring users to manually enter details.
Unique: Integrates task creation with metadata binding through a single MCP call, allowing LLMs to specify project, due date, tags, and notes atomically rather than requiring separate API calls for each property. Uses AppleScript's object model to create task objects with properties set during instantiation, avoiding post-creation modification overhead.
vs alternatives: More flexible than OmniFocus's native quick-entry (supports programmatic metadata assignment) and more efficient than manual task creation; differs from REST-based task APIs by leveraging AppleScript's direct object access for atomic creation.
Creates new projects in OmniFocus with optional parent project assignment, enabling hierarchical task organization through AppleScript automation. The add_project tool accepts project names and parent project references, translating them into AppleScript commands that instantiate project objects with proper hierarchy binding, allowing AI assistants to organize tasks into logical groupings and sub-projects based on conversation context or task analysis.
Unique: Supports hierarchical project creation through parent project assignment in a single MCP call, enabling LLMs to establish multi-level project structures without sequential parent-then-child creation patterns. Uses AppleScript's project object model to bind parent-child relationships during instantiation.
vs alternatives: More direct than manual OmniFocus project creation and supports programmatic hierarchy binding; differs from flat task list APIs by enabling nested project structures that mirror organizational complexity.
Updates existing OmniFocus tasks or projects by modifying specific fields (name, due date, project assignment, tags, notes, completion status, priority flags) through AppleScript automation. The editItem tool accepts item IDs and a map of field updates, translating them into AppleScript property assignments that modify task/project objects in-place, enabling AI assistants to refine task details, reschedule work, or update metadata based on conversation context without full item replacement.
Unique: Implements field-level updates through AppleScript property assignment, allowing selective modification of task/project properties without full object replacement. Uses a schema-based update map to translate LLM-generated field changes into targeted AppleScript property setters, enabling efficient partial updates.
vs alternatives: More granular than full item replacement and more efficient than query-modify-replace patterns; differs from REST PATCH endpoints by leveraging AppleScript's direct property access for atomic field updates.
Removes tasks or projects from OmniFocus through AppleScript automation, supporting both individual item deletion and cascading removal of nested items (deleting a project removes all contained tasks). The removeItem tool accepts item IDs and executes AppleScript delete commands that remove objects from the OmniFocus database, enabling AI assistants to clean up completed work, archive obsolete projects, or reorganize task structures based on analysis or user intent.
Unique: Implements cascading deletion through AppleScript's object hierarchy, automatically removing nested items when a parent project is deleted. Uses direct AppleScript delete commands rather than marking items as deleted, ensuring permanent removal from the OmniFocus database.
vs alternatives: More direct than manual OmniFocus deletion and supports programmatic cascading removal; differs from soft-delete APIs by providing permanent removal, which is appropriate for task management but requires careful LLM validation to prevent accidental data loss.
Creates multiple tasks in OmniFocus in a single MCP call through AppleScript automation, accepting an array of task specifications with metadata (names, due dates, projects, tags, notes) and executing sequential AppleScript commands to instantiate all tasks atomically. The batch_add_items tool optimizes bulk task creation by reducing MCP round-trips and AppleScript process overhead compared to individual add_omnifocus_task calls, enabling AI assistants to populate projects with related tasks or implement task breakdowns in a single operation.
Unique: Implements batch task creation through sequential AppleScript execution within a single MCP call, reducing round-trip overhead compared to individual task creation calls. Uses array-based input schema to enable LLMs to specify multiple tasks with consistent metadata in a single request, optimizing for bulk operations.
vs alternatives: More efficient than repeated add_omnifocus_task calls for bulk operations (fewer MCP round-trips) but slower than true parallel execution; differs from REST batch APIs by leveraging AppleScript's sequential execution model within a single MCP invocation.
+3 more capabilities
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to perform chained mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparisons) across both structured tables and unstructured text extracted from SEC filings. The dataset provides ground-truth question-answer pairs where answers require synthesizing data from multiple locations within earnings reports and applying sequential arithmetic operations, testing whether models can decompose complex financial queries into discrete computational steps.
Unique: Combines real SEC filing documents (not synthetic) with crowdsourced questions requiring multi-step arithmetic, creating a hybrid dataset that tests both domain knowledge extraction and quantitative reasoning in a single evaluation task. Unlike generic math word problems, answers require locating figures within 10+ page documents first.
vs alternatives: More challenging than DROP or SVAMP because it requires financial domain knowledge AND document retrieval before arithmetic, whereas generic math benchmarks assume figures are already extracted
Assesses whether AI systems understand financial terminology, accounting concepts, and domain-specific metrics by requiring them to answer questions about real earnings reports from S&P 500 companies. The dataset tests recognition of financial line items (revenue, COGS, operating expenses, net income), ability to distinguish between different financial statements (income statement vs balance sheet), and understanding of financial ratios and metrics without explicit instruction on their definitions.
Unique: Uses authentic SEC filings rather than synthetic financial data, exposing models to real-world accounting variations, footnote complexity, and the actual structure of professional financial documents. This tests transfer learning from general text to specialized domain without domain-specific pretraining.
vs alternatives: More authentic than synthetic financial QA datasets because it uses real earnings reports with their inherent complexity, but narrower than general financial knowledge benchmarks because it focuses only on historical data interpretation
FinQA scores higher at 60/100 vs OmniFocus-MCP at 32/100. OmniFocus-MCP leads on ecosystem, while FinQA is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to extract numerical data from both structured HTML/text tables and unstructured prose within the same document, then reason over the extracted values. The dataset contains questions where relevant data appears in different formats — some figures are in formatted tables with clear row/column headers, while others are embedded in narrative text or footnotes — requiring robust parsing and entity linking before computation can occur.
Unique: Combines structured table data with unstructured narrative in the same evaluation, forcing systems to handle format heterogeneity and resolve references across different data representations. Most table QA datasets use clean, isolated tables; this tests real-world document complexity.
vs alternatives: More realistic than isolated table QA benchmarks (like SQA or WikiTableQuestions) because it requires handling narrative context and format mixing, but simpler than full document understanding because tables are already in text format (no OCR needed)
Provides a curated, crowdsourced-annotated dataset of 8,281 question-answer pairs with multi-step reasoning requirements, enabling systematic evaluation of AI systems on financial numerical reasoning. The dataset includes quality control mechanisms through crowdworker annotation, answer validation against ground truth, and coverage across diverse financial metrics and company types within the S&P 500, creating a reproducible evaluation standard for the financial AI community.
Unique: Provides a publicly available, reproducible benchmark specifically designed for financial numerical reasoning with real SEC filings, enabling standardized comparison across different financial AI systems. Most financial datasets are proprietary or synthetic; this is open-source and authentic.
vs alternatives: More specialized and challenging than generic QA benchmarks (SQuAD, MRQA) because it requires financial domain knowledge and multi-step arithmetic, but narrower in scope than comprehensive financial understanding benchmarks because it focuses only on numerical reasoning
Assesses AI systems' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning by requiring them to locate and combine information from different sections of earnings reports. Questions may require finding a figure in the income statement, then locating a related metric in the balance sheet, then performing arithmetic across both — testing whether models can maintain context across document boundaries and understand relationships between different financial statement sections.
Unique: Embeds multi-hop reasoning requirements within authentic financial documents where hops correspond to real relationships between financial statement sections, rather than synthetic reasoning chains. This tests whether models understand domain structure, not just generic multi-hop patterns.
vs alternatives: More realistic than synthetic multi-hop datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA) because reasoning hops follow actual financial relationships, but less controlled because document structure varies and reasoning paths are implicit rather than explicitly annotated
Enables evaluation of whether AI systems can identify which arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison) are required to answer financial questions, then execute them correctly. The dataset implicitly tests operation selection — a question asking 'what is the profit margin' requires division (net income / revenue), while 'what is total assets' requires addition — forcing models to understand financial semantics before applying math.
Unique: Embeds arithmetic operation selection within financial domain context, requiring models to understand that 'margin' semantically maps to division and 'total' maps to addition. This tests semantic grounding of operations, not just arithmetic execution.
vs alternatives: More semantically grounded than generic math word problem datasets because operation selection is implicit in financial terminology, but less explicit than datasets with annotated operation types because operations must be inferred
Provides evaluation capability for AI systems to compare financial metrics across multiple S&P 500 companies or aggregate metrics across different time periods within the same company's earnings reports. While individual questions reference single documents, the dataset structure enables evaluation of systems that can retrieve and compare relevant companies, requiring understanding of which metrics are comparable across entities and how to normalize for company size or accounting differences.
Unique: Provides a foundation for evaluating cross-company financial comparison by including diverse S&P 500 companies with different business models and scales, enabling assessment of whether systems can normalize and compare metrics appropriately. Most financial QA datasets focus on single-document questions.
vs alternatives: Enables cross-company evaluation unlike single-document QA datasets, but requires external retrieval and comparison logic because the dataset itself contains only single-document questions