| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server using StdioServerTransport that registers 13+ tools as JSON-RPC methods, enabling AI agents (Claude, Cursor, Codex) to invoke workflow operations through a standardized protocol. Tools return TOON-formatted responses with structured data and markdown content, abstracting the underlying file system and state management from the AI client.
Unique: Uses StdioServerTransport for direct stdio communication with MCP clients, avoiding HTTP overhead and enabling tight integration with Claude Desktop and Cursor without requiring separate network services. Registers tools dynamically with TOON response formatting that embeds both structured data and human-readable markdown in a single response.
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with Claude Desktop and Cursor than REST-based tool APIs because it uses the native MCP protocol, eliminating HTTP serialization overhead and enabling bidirectional streaming for long-running operations.
Enforces a strict sequential workflow (Requirements → Design → Tasks → Implementation → Approval) by tracking phase state in the .spec-workflow/ directory structure and preventing out-of-order transitions. Each phase has dedicated tools and storage locations (specs/, approvals/, steering/, archive/), with the system validating phase prerequisites before allowing progression and maintaining an immutable audit trail of all transitions.
Unique: Implements phase enforcement through file system structure rather than a database, making the workflow state human-readable and version-controllable. Each phase has a dedicated directory (specs/, approvals/, etc.) and the system validates prerequisites by checking for required artifacts before allowing phase transitions, creating a self-documenting workflow.
vs alternatives: More transparent than traditional project management tools because the entire workflow state lives in version-controllable files within the project, enabling developers to understand and audit the workflow without accessing external systems.
Stores all workflow state (.spec-workflow/ directory per project and ~/.spec-workflow-mcp/ global state) as files and directories, making state human-readable and version-controllable. The system supports environment variable overrides (SPEC_WORKFLOW_HOME) for sandboxed or containerized environments where $HOME is read-only, enabling deployment flexibility. State is organized hierarchically (specs/, tasks/, approvals/, archive/, implementation/) with each artifact as a separate file for granular version control.
Unique: Uses the file system as the primary state store, making all workflow artifacts readable as plain text files that can be version-controlled with git. Supports environment variable overrides (SPEC_WORKFLOW_HOME) for flexible deployment in containerized and sandboxed environments without requiring database setup.
vs alternatives: More transparent than database-backed systems because state is human-readable and version-controllable, and more flexible than hardcoded paths because environment variables enable deployment in diverse environments (Docker, cloud, CI/CD).
Provides an i18n system that enables the web dashboard and VSCode extension to render in multiple languages. Language files are stored as JSON objects mapping keys to translated strings, and the system detects the user's locale from browser/VSCode settings and loads the appropriate language file. This allows teams in different regions to use the system in their native language without requiring separate deployments.
Unique: Implements i18n as a simple JSON-based system where language files are loaded based on browser/VSCode locale detection, enabling multi-language support without requiring separate deployments or complex configuration.
vs alternatives: Simpler than enterprise i18n frameworks because it uses plain JSON files, and more accessible than English-only systems because it enables non-English speakers to use the dashboard and extension in their native language.
Provides Dockerfile configurations for containerized deployment with multi-stage builds that separate build and runtime stages, reducing image size. The system includes security hardening (non-root user, minimal base image, read-only file system where possible) and supports both standard and prebuilt image variants. Docker Compose configuration enables easy local development with both MCP server and dashboard running in containers with proper networking and volume mounts.
Unique: Uses multi-stage Docker builds to separate build and runtime stages, reducing final image size and attack surface. Includes security hardening (non-root user, minimal base image) and provides both standard and prebuilt image variants for flexibility in deployment scenarios.
vs alternatives: More secure than running directly on the host because containerization isolates the system from the host environment, and more convenient than manual setup because Docker Compose enables one-command deployment of both MCP server and dashboard.
Records all significant events (tool invocations, approval decisions, phase transitions, file modifications) in audit logs stored in the .spec-workflow/ directory. Logs include timestamps, user identity, action type, and affected artifacts, enabling compliance audits and security investigations. The system supports structured logging formats (JSON) that can be ingested by SIEM systems or compliance tools for centralized monitoring.
Unique: Records all significant events in structured JSON audit logs stored in the .spec-workflow/ directory, making logs version-controllable and queryable without external systems. Logs include full context (user, timestamp, action, artifacts) enabling both compliance audits and security investigations.
vs alternatives: More transparent than external audit systems because logs are stored in the project and can be version-controlled, and more comprehensive than git history alone because it captures all workflow events (approvals, phase transitions, tool invocations) not just code changes.
Operates a Fastify-based HTTP server with WebSocket support that maintains real-time bidirectional communication with browser and VSCode extension clients. The dashboard aggregates state from multiple projects' .spec-workflow/ directories, broadcasts updates via WebSocket when files change (using file system watchers), and provides a unified view of all active projects without requiring clients to poll the file system directly.
Unique: Uses file system watchers to detect changes in .spec-workflow/ directories and broadcasts updates via WebSocket, eliminating the need for clients to poll. The dashboard aggregates multiple projects into a single view by scanning the activeProjects.json registry and watching all registered project directories simultaneously.
vs alternatives: More responsive than polling-based dashboards because WebSocket updates are pushed immediately when files change, and more lightweight than database-backed systems because it reads directly from the file system without requiring a separate data store.
Provides a VSCode extension that renders a sidebar panel connected to the dashboard server via WebSocket, displaying project status, task lists, and an interactive approval workflow interface. The extension allows developers to approve/reject implementations, view specifications, and manage tasks without leaving the editor, with all actions synchronized back to the .spec-workflow/ directory and broadcast to other connected clients.
Unique: Embeds the entire approval workflow and project monitoring interface directly in the VSCode sidebar, eliminating context switching. The extension maintains a WebSocket connection to the dashboard server and reflects changes in real-time, making approval decisions feel native to the development environment.
vs alternatives: More integrated than web-only dashboards because it lives in the developer's primary tool (VSCode) and provides immediate feedback on approval actions without requiring browser tab switching.
+6 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs spec-workflow-mcp at 35/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities