| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes n8n workflow lifecycle management (create, read, update, delete) through the Model Context Protocol's tool system, using JSON schema-based tool definitions that allow AI assistants to invoke workflow operations with type-safe parameters. Each operation maps directly to n8n REST API endpoints (POST /workflows, GET /workflows/{id}, etc.) with automatic parameter validation and error handling at the MCP layer.
Unique: Implements MCP tool definitions for n8n CRUD operations with automatic schema generation from n8n API responses, enabling AI assistants to understand workflow structure without hardcoded tool definitions. Uses a layered architecture where the Tools System abstracts n8n REST API details, allowing the MCP server to handle parameter marshaling and response transformation transparently.
vs alternatives: More AI-native than direct n8n API calls because it uses MCP's structured tool protocol, making LLMs understand workflow operations as first-class capabilities rather than generic HTTP requests; stronger than simple REST wrappers because it includes schema validation and error context at the MCP layer.
Provides two distinct execution pathways for n8n workflows: direct API execution (execution_run tool) that triggers workflows synchronously through the n8n REST API, and webhook execution (run_webhook tool) that invokes workflows via HTTP webhook endpoints with optional basic authentication. The server abstracts both mechanisms through a unified tool interface, allowing AI assistants to choose execution mode based on workflow requirements (synchronous vs. asynchronous, authenticated vs. public).
Unique: Abstracts two fundamentally different execution mechanisms (REST API vs. HTTP webhooks) behind a unified MCP tool interface, allowing AI assistants to select execution mode without understanding underlying transport differences. Implements basic auth marshaling for webhook calls, handling credential injection transparently rather than exposing raw HTTP details to the LLM.
vs alternatives: More flexible than n8n's native API alone because it supports both synchronous and asynchronous execution patterns; more secure than direct webhook URLs because it centralizes credential management in the MCP server rather than exposing URLs to the LLM.
Provides a tool to fetch complete workflow definitions (workflow_get) by workflow ID, returning the full configuration including all nodes, connections, credentials, and metadata. This allows AI assistants to inspect existing workflows, understand their structure, and use that information for modification or cloning. The tool returns the exact workflow definition that would be used for updates or exports.
Unique: Exposes complete workflow definitions through a tool interface, allowing AI assistants to inspect and reason about workflow structure. Returns the exact configuration format used for updates, enabling round-trip modification (fetch → modify → update) without schema translation.
vs alternatives: More detailed than workflow metadata because it includes full node and connection configuration; stronger than the workflow list because it provides actionable data for modification, not just summary information.
Provides a tool to list all workflows in the n8n instance (workflow_list) with summary metadata including workflow ID, name, active status, creation date, and last update time. This allows AI assistants to discover available workflows, understand the workflow inventory, and select specific workflows for further operations. The list is returned as an array of workflow summary objects.
Unique: Provides a simple workflow discovery tool that returns summary metadata, allowing AI assistants to understand the workflow inventory without fetching full definitions. Integrates with the Resources System to also expose workflow lists as static resources (n8n://workflows/list).
vs alternatives: More efficient than fetching full workflow definitions because it returns only summary metadata; stronger than manual UI browsing because it's programmatic and can be used by AI agents for decision-making.
Provides tools to query execution status (execution_get, execution_list), stop running executions (execution_stop), and retrieve execution statistics through the Resources System. The implementation polls the n8n API for execution state, allowing AI assistants to monitor workflow progress, detect failures, and make decisions based on execution outcomes without requiring webhooks or event subscriptions.
Unique: Implements a polling-based execution monitoring system that allows AI assistants to synchronously wait for asynchronous workflow completion, bridging the gap between LLM request-response semantics and n8n's event-driven execution model. Uses the Resources System to expose execution statistics as queryable data, enabling agents to make decisions based on historical execution patterns.
vs alternatives: More AI-friendly than raw n8n API polling because it abstracts retry logic and error handling; stronger than webhook-only approaches because it supports both push (webhooks) and pull (polling) patterns, giving agents flexibility in how they monitor workflows.
Exposes n8n data as MCP resources (n8n://workflows/list, n8n://workflow/{id}, n8n://execution-stats, etc.), allowing AI assistants to retrieve structured information about workflows and executions as readable resources rather than tool outputs. Static resources (workflow list, health status) are fetched on-demand, while dynamic resources support parameterized queries (e.g., n8n://workflow/123 returns details for workflow 123). This enables AI assistants to reference n8n data in their context window without explicit tool invocations.
Unique: Implements the MCP resource protocol to expose n8n data as first-class resources rather than tool outputs, allowing AI assistants to reference workflow information in their reasoning without explicit function calls. Supports both static resources (fixed paths) and dynamic resources (parameterized by ID), providing a flexible data access model that integrates with MCP clients' context management.
vs alternatives: More context-efficient than tool-based data retrieval because resources can be embedded in system prompts or referenced without tool invocation overhead; stronger than simple API wrappers because it uses MCP's native resource protocol, enabling better integration with Claude and other MCP-aware assistants.
Manages n8n connection configuration through environment variables (N8N_API_URL, N8N_API_KEY, N8N_WEBHOOK_USERNAME, N8N_WEBHOOK_PASSWORD), allowing the MCP server to connect to different n8n instances by changing environment variables. The configuration is loaded at server startup and used to initialize API clients, supporting both local and remote n8n instances with optional webhook authentication. This enables deployment flexibility without code changes.
Unique: Uses environment-driven configuration to decouple n8n connection details from code, enabling the same MCP server binary to connect to different n8n instances. Supports optional webhook authentication credentials, allowing the server to invoke secured webhook endpoints without exposing credentials to AI assistants.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded configuration because it supports environment-based deployment patterns; more secure than embedding credentials in code because it uses standard environment variable practices, compatible with Docker, Kubernetes, and other containerized deployment systems.
Implements error handling at multiple layers (MCP protocol layer, n8n API layer, transport layer) with optional debug logging controlled by the DEBUG environment variable. Errors from n8n API calls are caught, transformed into MCP-compatible error responses, and logged with context (request parameters, API response status). This allows AI assistants to understand why operations failed and enables developers to diagnose issues through server logs.
Unique: Implements multi-layer error handling that catches failures at the MCP protocol level, n8n API level, and transport level, transforming them into consistent error responses. Uses optional debug logging to preserve context about failed operations, enabling both AI assistants and developers to understand failure reasons.
vs alternatives: More diagnostic than silent failures because it provides detailed error context; stronger than generic error messages because it preserves request parameters and API responses, enabling root cause analysis without re-running failed operations.
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs n8n-mcp-server at 30/100. n8n-mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities