firebase-mcp vs Power Query
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | firebase-mcp | Power Query |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 29/100 | 32/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 18 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Firestore read, write, update, and delete operations as standardized MCP tools that AI clients can invoke. The FirebaseMcpServer class registers individual tool handlers (firestore_add_document, firestore_get_document, firestore_update_document, firestore_delete_document) that map directly to Firestore SDK methods, with schema-based parameter validation and error handling that converts Firebase exceptions into structured MCP responses. Each tool accepts collection path and document data as parameters, executes the operation against the initialized Firebase instance, and returns typed results (document IDs, success confirmations, or error details).
Unique: Implements Firestore operations as discrete MCP tools with schema-based parameter validation and structured error handling, allowing AI clients to perform database operations through a standardized tool-calling interface rather than direct SDK access. The tool registry pattern (src/index.ts 477-1334) enables fine-grained permission control per operation type.
vs alternatives: Provides safer, more auditable Firestore access than direct SDK exposure because each operation is a registered tool with explicit schema validation, whereas direct Firebase SDK access in AI contexts risks uncontrolled data mutations.
Implements firestore_list_documents and firestore_list_collections tools that traverse Firestore collection hierarchies and return paginated document snapshots. The implementation queries collections using the Firestore SDK, optionally applies client-side filtering based on field predicates passed as parameters, and returns structured arrays of documents with metadata. The tool supports nested collection discovery (listing subcollections within documents) and basic field-based filtering without requiring complex WHERE clause syntax, making it accessible to AI clients that may not be familiar with Firestore query syntax.
Unique: Provides simplified collection listing and field-based filtering as MCP tools, abstracting away Firestore's query syntax complexity. The implementation uses client-side filtering (src/index.ts) rather than server-side WHERE clauses, making it more accessible to AI clients but less performant on large datasets.
vs alternatives: Easier for AI agents to use than raw Firestore queries because it exposes simple field-matching as tool parameters, whereas direct Firestore SDK requires understanding query builder syntax that LLMs may struggle with.
Implements storage_list_files tool that enumerates files in a Firebase Storage bucket with optional path prefix filtering. The tool queries the Storage bucket using the Admin SDK's listFiles() method, optionally filters results by a path prefix (e.g., 'uploads/2024/'), and returns an array of file metadata including name, size, creation date, and content type. The implementation supports pagination through a maxResults parameter, allowing large buckets to be enumerated incrementally. Results are returned as structured objects with file paths and metadata, enabling AI clients to discover and analyze bucket contents.
Unique: Provides bucket enumeration with prefix filtering as an MCP tool, enabling AI clients to discover Storage contents without direct SDK access. The implementation uses Firebase Admin SDK's listFiles() method with optional prefix filtering.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than direct SDK access because it abstracts bucket enumeration into a tool with clear parameters, whereas raw SDK requires understanding pagination tokens and file object structures.
Implements firestore_add_document tool that creates new documents in Firestore collections with either auto-generated or specified document IDs. The tool accepts a collection path and document data, and optionally a document ID. If no ID is provided, Firestore generates a unique ID automatically using its ID generation algorithm. The implementation uses the Firestore SDK's add() method (for auto-ID) or set() method (for specified IDs), both of which are atomic operations. The tool returns the generated or specified document ID and optionally the full document snapshot, enabling AI clients to reference newly created documents.
Unique: Exposes Firestore's document creation with both auto-generated and specified IDs as an MCP tool, allowing AI clients to create documents and receive generated IDs for subsequent operations. The implementation uses Firestore's add() and set() methods appropriately.
vs alternatives: More convenient than direct SDK usage because the tool handles ID generation and returns the ID in the response, whereas raw SDK requires separate calls to get the generated ID.
Exposes Firebase Storage operations (storage_upload_file, storage_download_file, storage_list_files) as MCP tools that handle file I/O through the Storage SDK. The upload tool accepts base64-encoded file content and a destination path, writes to Storage, and returns a public download URL. The download tool retrieves files by path and returns base64-encoded content. The list tool enumerates files in a Storage bucket with optional path prefix filtering. All operations include error handling for authentication failures, missing files, and quota exceeded scenarios, with results formatted as structured MCP responses.
Unique: Implements Storage operations as MCP tools with base64 content encoding, allowing AI clients to handle binary files through text-based tool parameters. The approach trades efficiency for compatibility with text-only MCP transports, enabling file operations in environments where binary protocols aren't available.
vs alternatives: Safer than exposing Storage SDK directly because file operations are mediated through registered tools with explicit parameter validation, whereas direct SDK access could allow uncontrolled file deletion or overwriting.
Exposes Firebase Authentication operations (auth_get_user, auth_list_users) as MCP tools that query the Firebase Auth service. The get_user tool retrieves a specific user's profile by UID or email, returning user metadata (creation date, last sign-in, email verification status, custom claims). The list_users tool enumerates all users in the project with pagination support. Both tools return sanitized user data (no password hashes or sensitive credentials) and include error handling for missing users or permission issues. The implementation uses the Firebase Admin SDK's Auth module to access user records.
Unique: Provides read-only access to Firebase Auth user metadata through MCP tools, sanitizing sensitive fields and exposing only user profile information. The implementation uses the Firebase Admin SDK's Auth module (src/index.ts) to query user records without exposing credential management capabilities.
vs alternatives: Safer than exposing Auth SDK directly because it restricts operations to read-only queries and sanitizes responses, whereas direct SDK access could allow credential modification or user deletion.
Implements a transport layer that supports both HTTP and STDIO protocols for MCP communication, allowing the Firebase MCP server to integrate with different AI client architectures. The server initializes with a configurable transport mechanism (via environment variable or constructor parameter), handles protocol-specific serialization/deserialization, and manages connection lifecycle. HTTP transport exposes the MCP server on a specified port with standard HTTP request/response handling, while STDIO transport reads from stdin and writes to stdout, enabling integration with CLI-based AI tools and local development environments. The transport abstraction is handled by the MCP SDK, with the Firebase server providing configuration and tool registration.
Unique: Provides dual-transport support (HTTP and STDIO) through MCP SDK abstraction, allowing the same Firebase tool registry to serve both network-based clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor) and local CLI tools. The transport selection is environment-driven, enabling deployment flexibility without code changes.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-transport implementations because it supports both network and local communication patterns, whereas Firebase SDK alone requires direct code integration without protocol abstraction.
Handles Firebase project initialization by reading service account credentials from environment variables or configuration files and initializing the Firebase Admin SDK. The FirebaseMcpServer constructor accepts a Firebase config object or reads from GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS environment variable, validates the configuration, and initializes Firestore, Storage, and Auth service instances. The implementation follows Firebase Admin SDK patterns, creating singleton service instances that are reused across all tool handlers. Error handling includes validation of credential format, project ID verification, and graceful failure if Firebase services are unavailable.
Unique: Implements Firebase initialization through environment-driven configuration, allowing credential management without code changes. The approach uses Firebase Admin SDK's standard initialization patterns (src/index.ts 96-124) with support for both explicit config objects and GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS environment variable.
vs alternatives: More secure than hardcoding credentials because it externalizes credential management to environment variables, whereas embedding credentials in code or configuration files creates security risks.
+4 more capabilities
Construct data transformations through a visual, step-by-step interface without writing code. Users click through operations like filtering, sorting, and reshaping data, with each step automatically generating M language code in the background.
Automatically detect and assign appropriate data types (text, number, date, boolean) to columns based on content analysis. Reduces manual type-setting and catches data quality issues early.
Stack multiple datasets vertically to combine rows from different sources. Automatically aligns columns by name and handles mismatched schemas.
Split a single column into multiple columns based on delimiters, fixed widths, or patterns. Extracts structured data from unstructured text fields.
Convert data between wide and long formats. Pivot transforms rows into columns (aggregating values), while unpivot transforms columns into rows.
Identify and remove duplicate rows based on all columns or specific key columns. Keeps first or last occurrence based on user preference.
Detect, replace, and manage null or missing values in datasets. Options include removing rows, filling with defaults, or using formulas to impute values.
Power Query scores higher at 32/100 vs firebase-mcp at 29/100. firebase-mcp leads on adoption and ecosystem, while Power Query is stronger on quality. However, firebase-mcp offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Apply text operations like case conversion (upper, lower, proper), trimming whitespace, and text replacement. Standardizes text data for consistent analysis.
+10 more capabilities