| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 22 decomposed | 6 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Wraps 19 battle-tested security tools (Nmap, SQLmap, Nuclei, FFUF, etc.) behind a unified Model Context Protocol interface, enabling AI assistants to invoke security operations through standardized tool schemas rather than direct CLI invocation. Each tool maintains its native functionality while exposing capabilities through MCP's resource and tool calling mechanisms, allowing clients to discover available security operations via introspection without tool-specific knowledge.
Unique: Implements MCP servers as thin wrappers around CLI tools using child_process execution with structured argument building and output parsing, rather than reimplementing tool logic or requiring native language bindings. Each tool directory contains independent MCP server with its own package.json, enabling modular deployment and version management.
vs alternatives: Provides standardized MCP interface to security tools without requiring tool vendors to implement MCP natively, whereas alternatives like direct API integration require tool-specific SDKs or REST wrappers for each tool.
Implements reconnaissance tools (Amass, Assetfinder, Certificate Search, Waybackurls, shuffledns) that gather attack surface information without active network traffic, using public data sources like SSL certificate transparency logs, DNS historical records, and archive.org. Amass provides advanced passive/active mode switching with configurable data source selection, while Assetfinder performs lightweight enumeration using only public sources for speed. These tools feed domain discovery into downstream scanning workflows.
Unique: Combines multiple independent reconnaissance tools (Amass, Assetfinder, Certificate Search, Waybackurls, shuffledns) into a unified MCP interface, allowing agents to orchestrate multi-source enumeration and deduplicate results across tools. Amass integration specifically exposes passive/active mode switching and data source configuration through MCP parameters.
vs alternatives: Aggregates results from multiple public data sources through a single MCP interface, whereas standalone tools like Assetfinder only query one source type, requiring manual orchestration to combine results.
Integrates Smuggler's HTTP request smuggling detection capabilities through MCP, enabling agents to identify desynchronization vulnerabilities between frontend and backend HTTP parsers. Smuggler tests various HTTP request formatting techniques (CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE) to detect parser inconsistencies. The MCP wrapper handles test case generation and result interpretation, allowing agents to assess HTTP parsing security without understanding smuggling techniques.
Unique: Provides HTTP request smuggling detection through MCP by wrapping Smuggler's test case generation and response analysis. Handles interpretation of timing-based and behavior-based detection results, enabling agents to identify desynchronization vulnerabilities without understanding HTTP parsing internals.
vs alternatives: Offers specialized HTTP smuggling detection, whereas generic web scanners like Nuclei require custom templates and manual testing for smuggling vulnerabilities.
Exposes Scout Suite's multi-cloud security assessment capabilities through MCP, enabling agents to audit AWS, Azure, GCP, and other cloud provider configurations for security misconfigurations. Scout Suite performs API-based reconnaissance to enumerate cloud resources and assess compliance with security best practices. The MCP wrapper handles cloud provider authentication, resource enumeration, and result parsing, converting Scout Suite's detailed findings into structured security assessments.
Unique: Provides multi-cloud security assessment through MCP by wrapping Scout Suite's API-based enumeration and compliance checking. Handles cloud provider authentication and resource discovery, enabling agents to audit cloud infrastructure without understanding cloud provider APIs.
vs alternatives: Offers multi-cloud security assessment with API-based resource enumeration, whereas manual cloud auditing requires deep knowledge of each cloud provider's API and security best practices.
Integrates MobSF (Mobile Security Framework) through MCP for automated mobile application security assessment. MobSF performs static and dynamic analysis on Android and iOS applications, identifying security vulnerabilities, insecure configurations, and code quality issues. The MCP wrapper handles APK/IPA file upload, analysis execution, and result parsing, converting MobSF's detailed findings into structured security assessments.
Unique: Provides mobile application security assessment through MCP by wrapping MobSF's static and dynamic analysis engines. Handles APK/IPA file processing and result parsing, enabling agents to analyze mobile applications without understanding mobile security testing methodologies.
vs alternatives: Offers automated mobile security testing with both static and dynamic analysis, whereas manual mobile security testing requires expertise in Android/iOS security and reverse engineering.
Exposes Katana's web crawling capabilities through MCP, enabling agents to discover web application endpoints and parameters through hybrid crawling that parses JavaScript. Katana performs both traditional link-following crawling and JavaScript execution to discover dynamically-generated endpoints. The MCP wrapper handles crawl configuration, scope management, and result parsing, allowing agents to map application attack surface without manual crawling.
Unique: Provides JavaScript-aware web crawling through MCP by wrapping Katana's hybrid crawling engine that executes JavaScript to discover dynamically-generated endpoints. Handles crawl scope management and result parsing, enabling agents to map SPA attack surface without understanding JavaScript execution.
vs alternatives: Offers JavaScript-aware crawling that discovers dynamically-generated endpoints, whereas traditional crawlers like Burp Suite only follow static links and miss JavaScript-generated content.
Integrates shuffledns's high-speed DNS brute-forcing and mass resolution capabilities through MCP, enabling agents to discover subdomains through wordlist-based DNS queries and resolve large subdomain lists efficiently. shuffledns uses concurrent DNS queries with configurable resolver lists to achieve high-speed resolution. The MCP wrapper handles wordlist selection, resolver configuration, and result parsing, allowing agents to enumerate DNS records without manual DNS tool configuration.
Unique: Provides high-speed DNS brute-forcing and mass resolution through MCP by wrapping shuffledns's concurrent DNS query engine. Handles resolver configuration and result parsing, enabling agents to enumerate DNS records without understanding DNS protocol or resolver selection.
vs alternatives: Offers high-speed DNS brute-forcing with concurrent query support, whereas sequential DNS tools like dig are significantly slower for large-scale enumeration.
Exposes Waybackurls's integration with Archive.org's Wayback Machine through MCP, enabling agents to discover historical URLs and archived versions of web applications. Waybackurls queries the Wayback Machine API to retrieve all captured URLs for a domain, providing insight into application evolution and potentially exposing forgotten endpoints or parameters. The MCP wrapper handles Wayback Machine API queries and result parsing.
Unique: Provides historical URL discovery through MCP by querying Archive.org's Wayback Machine API and parsing results. Enables agents to discover forgotten endpoints and parameters through archived versions without understanding Wayback Machine API mechanics.
vs alternatives: Offers historical URL discovery through Archive.org integration, whereas manual Wayback Machine browsing is time-consuming and difficult to automate at scale.
+14 more capabilities
Converts variable-length text sequences into fixed 384-dimensional dense vector embeddings using a distilled BERT architecture (6 transformer layers, 22.7M parameters). The model applies mean pooling over token representations and L2 normalization to produce normalized embeddings suitable for cosine similarity comparisons. Trained on diverse datasets (S2ORC, MS MARCO, StackExchange, Yahoo Answers) to capture semantic meaning across domains including academic papers, web search, Q&A, and code.
Unique: Distilled BERT architecture (6 layers vs standard 12) trained via knowledge distillation from larger models, achieving 5-10x faster inference than full BERT while maintaining 95%+ semantic quality; optimized for mean-pooling-based sentence representations rather than [CLS] token extraction
vs alternatives: Faster inference than OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small (sub-10ms vs 50-100ms per text) and fully open-source/self-hostable unlike proprietary APIs, though with slightly lower semantic quality on specialized domains
Computes pairwise cosine similarity scores between sets of text embeddings using vectorized operations, enabling efficient comparison of one query against thousands of documents. Leverages PyTorch/TensorFlow's optimized matrix multiplication (GEMM) kernels to compute similarity matrices in O(n*m) time where n and m are batch sizes. Supports both symmetric similarity (corpus-to-corpus) and asymmetric queries (single query vs corpus).
Unique: Integrates seamlessly with sentence-transformers' util.semantic_search() function which uses optimized FAISS-style indexing for top-k retrieval without computing full similarity matrices, reducing memory overhead from O(n*m) to O(n) for large-scale retrieval
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than naive cosine similarity implementations and faster than computing similarities on-the-fly from raw text, though slower than specialized vector databases (FAISS, Milvus) for >100k document corpora
all-MiniLM-L6-v2 scores higher at 55/100 vs mcp-for-security at 35/100. mcp-for-security leads on quality and ecosystem, while all-MiniLM-L6-v2 is stronger on adoption.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Supports inference and deployment across multiple runtime formats including PyTorch, TensorFlow, ONNX, OpenVINO, and Rust bindings, enabling deployment flexibility from cloud servers to edge devices. The model can be exported to ONNX format for hardware-agnostic inference, quantized to int8 for mobile/edge deployment, or compiled to OpenVINO for Intel CPU optimization. Each format maintains numerical equivalence (within floating-point precision) while trading off inference speed, model size, and hardware compatibility.
Unique: Distributed across multiple ecosystem projects (sentence-transformers for PyTorch, ONNX community for format conversion, OpenVINO toolkit for Intel optimization) rather than single unified export pipeline; enables best-in-class optimization per format but requires manual orchestration
vs alternatives: More deployment flexibility than proprietary embedding APIs (OpenAI, Cohere) which lock you into their inference infrastructure; more mature ONNX support than newer models due to wide adoption in sentence-transformers ecosystem
Applies embeddings trained on diverse datasets (academic papers, web search, Q&A, code search, StackExchange) to new domains without fine-tuning, leveraging learned semantic representations that generalize across task boundaries. The model was trained via multi-task learning on 8+ datasets with different semantic properties, enabling it to capture domain-agnostic semantic relationships. Works effectively on out-of-domain text due to broad training coverage, though with degraded performance on highly specialized domains (medical, legal, scientific jargon).
Unique: Trained via multi-task learning on 8+ heterogeneous datasets (S2ORC papers, MS MARCO web search, StackExchange Q&A, Yahoo Answers, CodeSearchNet, SearchQA, ELI5) rather than single-domain optimization, creating a 'semantic commons' that generalizes across task boundaries at the cost of domain-specific peak performance
vs alternatives: Better zero-shot transfer to unseen domains than domain-specific embeddings (e.g., SciBERT for papers only), though 5-15% lower performance than fine-tuned models on specialized tasks; more practical for multi-domain applications than maintaining separate embedding models
Achieves 5-10x faster inference than full BERT models through knowledge distillation, where a 6-layer student model learns to replicate the behavior of larger teacher models while maintaining 95%+ semantic quality. The distilled architecture reduces parameters from 110M (BERT-base) to 22.7M, enabling sub-10ms inference on CPU and sub-1ms on GPU. Distillation preserves semantic understanding while eliminating redundant transformer layers, making it suitable for latency-sensitive applications.
Unique: Uses asymmetric distillation where student (6 layers) learns from teacher (12 layers) via MSE loss on hidden states and attention patterns, not just final embeddings; preserves semantic structure while reducing depth, enabling both speed and quality retention
vs alternatives: Faster inference than full BERT-base (5-10x) and smaller than full models (22.7M vs 110M params), though slower than extreme compression techniques (TinyBERT, MobileBERT) which sacrifice more quality; better quality-to-speed trade-off than quantization-only approaches
Produces L2-normalized embeddings where all vectors have unit length (norm = 1), enabling direct cosine similarity computation via simple dot product without explicit normalization. The normalization is applied post-pooling in the model architecture, ensuring embeddings are always in the unit hypersphere. This design choice enables efficient similarity scoring and makes embeddings compatible with specialized vector databases (FAISS, Pinecone) that assume normalized vectors.
Unique: Applies L2 normalization as final layer in model architecture (not post-processing), ensuring all embeddings are guaranteed normalized without additional computation; enables direct dot-product similarity computation with mathematical equivalence to cosine similarity
vs alternatives: More efficient than post-hoc normalization of unnormalized embeddings; ensures compatibility with vector databases that assume normalized inputs; enables faster similarity computation (dot product vs cosine) on GPU