| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Orchestrates multimodal AI agents through a ComposableAgent plugin architecture that dynamically chains GUI, code, MCP, and browser automation tools. Implements a T5 format streaming parser for structured LLM output and a Tarko framework execution loop that manages agent state, tool invocation, and event streaming. Agents receive vision-language model outputs (screenshots, structured data) and route them through specialized plugin handlers that execute actions and feed results back into the reasoning loop.
Unique: Implements a plugin-based agent composition system where GUI, code, MCP, and browser tools are interchangeable modules that share a unified T5 streaming format and Tarko execution framework, enabling runtime tool swapping without agent recompilation. Most competitors (Anthropic Claude, OpenAI Assistants) use fixed tool sets; UI-TARS allows dynamic plugin registration and custom tool handlers.
vs alternatives: Offers more flexible tool composition than fixed-tool agent platforms because plugins are registered at runtime and can be swapped without redeploying the agent, while maintaining streaming output and structured tool calling across heterogeneous tool types.
Automates desktop and web UI interactions by capturing screenshots, sending them to a vision-language model (VLM), parsing structured action commands (click, type, scroll), and executing them via the GUIAgent SDK. The SDK provides operator implementations for local (Electron-based) and remote (VNC/RDP) desktop control, with coordinate-based action execution and screen state feedback loops. Supports both UI-TARS proprietary models (Doubao-1.5-UI-TARS) and generic vision LLMs through a configurable VLM provider interface.
Unique: Implements a closed-loop screenshot → VLM → action execution pipeline with specialized operator implementations for both local (Electron) and remote (VNC/RDP) desktop control, supporting UI-TARS-optimized vision models alongside generic LLMs. The GUIAgent SDK abstracts operator implementations, allowing swappable backends (local vs. remote) without changing agent logic.
vs alternatives: Faster and more flexible than Selenium/Playwright for visual reasoning tasks because it uses VLM understanding of UI semantics rather than DOM selectors, and supports remote desktop automation natively, though slower than API-based automation for latency-sensitive workflows.
Implements a hooks and lifecycle event system that allows custom code to execute at specific points in the agent execution loop (before/after tool call, on error, on completion). Hooks are registered at agent initialization and invoked by the Tarko framework during execution, enabling extensibility without modifying core agent code. Events include reasoning, tool_call, result, error, and completion, with detailed context passed to hook handlers.
Unique: Implements a comprehensive hooks and lifecycle event system that allows custom code to execute at specific agent execution points, enabling extensibility and observability without modifying core agent code. Integrates with Tarko framework for unified event handling across all agent types.
vs alternatives: More extensible than agent frameworks without hooks because custom logic can be injected at specific execution points, whereas frameworks without hooks require forking or subclassing to customize behavior.
Provides runtime settings management that allows agents to be reconfigured without restart, including tool registration, model parameters, execution timeouts, and resource limits. Settings are stored in a configuration object that can be updated via REST API or programmatically, with changes taking effect immediately for new tool invocations. Supports per-session and global settings with hierarchical override (session > global).
Unique: Implements a runtime settings system that allows agent reconfiguration without restart, with per-session and global settings and hierarchical override, enabling dynamic behavior adjustment and A/B testing without redeployment.
vs alternatives: More flexible than static configuration because settings can be changed at runtime without restarting the agent, whereas most agent frameworks require redeployment for configuration changes.
Implements the core agent execution loop (Agent Runner) that orchestrates reasoning, tool invocation, and result feedback in an iterative cycle. The loop executor manages execution state, handles streaming output from the LLM, invokes tools via the tool call engine, and feeds results back into the next reasoning step. Supports configurable loop termination conditions (max iterations, tool completion, explicit stop) and provides detailed execution traces for debugging.
Unique: Implements a full agent execution loop with streaming output, tool invocation, and result feedback, integrated with the Tarko framework for unified event handling and state management. Provides detailed execution traces and configurable termination conditions.
vs alternatives: More complete than simple LLM wrappers because it implements the full agent loop with tool invocation and result feedback, whereas basic LLM APIs only provide single-turn inference.
Implements a tool call engine that validates tool invocations against registered tool schemas, handles tool execution via multiple strategies (direct function call, MCP server, subprocess), and manages tool result formatting. The engine supports tool retries on failure, timeout handling, and error recovery. Tool execution strategies are pluggable, allowing custom implementations for specific tool types (e.g., subprocess for shell commands, MCP for remote tools).
Unique: Implements a pluggable tool call engine with schema validation, multiple execution strategies (direct, MCP, subprocess), and built-in error handling and retry logic, enabling flexible tool execution without changing agent code.
vs alternatives: More robust than simple function calling because it validates tool calls before execution, handles errors and retries, and supports multiple execution strategies, whereas basic function calling only invokes functions without validation or error handling.
Provides a content rendering system that formats agent outputs (text, code, images, structured data) for display in the web UI or other frontends. Supports rendering of code blocks with syntax highlighting, images with metadata, structured data as tables or JSON, and markdown-formatted text. The rendering system is extensible, allowing custom renderers for specific content types.
Unique: Implements a content rendering system that supports multiple content types (text, code, images, structured data) with extensible custom renderers, enabling rich display of diverse agent outputs in web UIs.
vs alternatives: More complete than simple text display because it supports syntax highlighting, images, and structured data rendering, whereas basic UIs only display plain text.
Integrates Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers as dynamically registered tools within the agent framework, using an MCP client architecture that handles transport (stdio, SSE, WebSocket), schema discovery, and tool invocation. The MCP Agent Plugin wraps MCP server capabilities into the ComposableAgent plugin interface, automatically discovering tool schemas and mapping them to the T5 format for LLM tool calling. Supports multiple concurrent MCP server connections with isolated resource management and error handling per server.
Unique: Implements a full MCP client stack with transport abstraction (stdio, SSE, WebSocket) and dynamic schema discovery, wrapping MCP servers as interchangeable plugins in the ComposableAgent architecture. Handles concurrent MCP connections with isolated error handling, unlike simpler MCP clients that assume single-server scenarios.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded tool integration because MCP servers can be added/removed without agent redeployment, and supports multiple concurrent servers with isolated resource management, whereas most agent frameworks require tool definitions to be compiled into the agent.
+7 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
UI-TARS-desktop scores higher at 45/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities