| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables MCP servers to authenticate clients using industry-standard OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) protocols. Implements authorization code flow, token validation, and identity provider integration patterns, allowing MCP servers to delegate authentication to external identity providers (Auth0, Okta, Google, etc.) rather than managing credentials directly. Abstracts provider-specific OAuth/OIDC implementations behind a unified MCP-compatible interface.
Unique: Purpose-built for MCP protocol's request/response model rather than HTTP-centric OAuth flows; abstracts OAuth complexity into MCP-native capability handlers, allowing servers to authenticate clients within the MCP message transport layer
vs alternatives: Simpler than implementing OAuth manually in MCP servers and more MCP-native than adapting generic OAuth libraries designed for HTTP REST APIs
Provides pre-built, composable authentication middleware that can be attached to MCP server request handlers with minimal configuration. Implements middleware pattern for intercepting MCP requests, validating credentials, and enforcing authentication policies before tools/resources are exposed. Supports declarative configuration of which MCP capabilities require authentication and what credential types are accepted.
Unique: Designed as drop-in middleware for MCP's request/response cycle rather than HTTP-layer middleware; integrates directly with MCP server's capability handler chain, allowing per-tool authentication policies
vs alternatives: Faster to implement than custom auth logic in each MCP tool and more flexible than monolithic authentication layers that apply uniformly to all server capabilities
Abstracts authentication across multiple identity providers (Auth0, Okta, Google, GitHub, custom OIDC) behind a unified client interface. Handles provider-specific OAuth flows, token formats, and claim mappings, normalizing user identity into a standard schema regardless of which provider authenticated the user. Enables MCP clients to connect to servers that support multiple authentication sources without provider-specific logic.
Unique: Implements identity federation at the MCP protocol level, normalizing user identity across providers before MCP requests are processed, rather than handling federation at the HTTP/transport layer
vs alternatives: Simpler than building provider-specific auth logic in each MCP client and more flexible than single-provider OAuth libraries
Validates JWT tokens passed in MCP requests, verifies signatures against provider public keys, and extracts claims for authorization decisions. Implements JWT validation patterns including signature verification, expiration checking, issuer validation, and audience validation. Supports both symmetric (HS256) and asymmetric (RS256, ES256) signing algorithms and handles key rotation from OIDC discovery endpoints.
Unique: Integrates JWT validation directly into MCP request processing pipeline, allowing per-request token validation without external HTTP calls, and supports OIDC key rotation for automatic key management
vs alternatives: More efficient than calling external token validation endpoints for every MCP request and more secure than trusting unvalidated tokens
Implements API key-based authentication for MCP clients, supporting key generation, validation, and revocation. Handles API key storage (hashed in database), lookup, and validation against incoming MCP requests. Supports key scoping (limiting keys to specific tools/resources) and expiration policies. Provides simpler alternative to OAuth for service-to-service MCP communication.
Unique: Provides lightweight API key validation without external provider dependencies, enabling offline MCP authentication and supporting key scoping at the MCP capability level
vs alternatives: Faster and simpler than OAuth for internal service-to-service MCP communication and doesn't require external identity provider availability
Manages OAuth token refresh, expiration tracking, and credential lifecycle for MCP clients and servers. Automatically refreshes expired tokens using refresh tokens, handles token rotation, and maintains credential state across MCP sessions. Implements exponential backoff for failed refresh attempts and provides hooks for credential update events.
Unique: Implements token lifecycle management as a background process integrated with MCP client/server lifecycle, automatically refreshing credentials without application intervention
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual token refresh logic and prevents authentication failures due to expired tokens in long-running MCP applications
Provides standardized error handling for authentication failures in MCP, including invalid credentials, expired tokens, and missing authentication. Generates appropriate MCP error responses with actionable error messages and challenge directives (e.g., 'please re-authenticate'). Implements retry logic for transient auth failures and distinguishes between client errors (invalid credentials) and server errors (provider unavailable).
Unique: Standardizes authentication error responses within MCP protocol, providing clients with actionable error information and challenge directives rather than generic HTTP-style error codes
vs alternatives: Better developer experience than generic error responses and enables clients to implement intelligent retry/re-auth logic
Centralizes configuration for multiple authentication providers (OAuth, OIDC, API keys, etc.) with support for environment variables, config files, and runtime updates. Validates provider configuration (client IDs, secrets, discovery URLs) and provides sensible defaults. Supports configuration inheritance and override patterns for different deployment environments (dev, staging, production).
Unique: Provides provider-agnostic configuration management that works across OAuth, OIDC, API keys, and custom auth methods, with environment-specific overrides and validation
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing provider configuration manually in each MCP server and more flexible than hardcoded provider lists
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs mcp-auth at 38/100. mcp-auth leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities