| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Extends the official @modelcontextprotocol/sdk with a generic McpServer<TTools> class that accumulates tool definitions while preserving TypeScript type information across server and client boundaries. The framework uses a type inference system that propagates tool schemas from server registration through to React hooks on the client, enabling compile-time type checking for tool invocations without runtime type assertions. This is achieved through TypeScript generics and a manifest system that maps tool definitions to their implementations.
Unique: Uses TypeScript generics and a dual-package architecture (skybridge/server and skybridge/web) to propagate type information from MCP tool registration through to React hooks, enabling compile-time type checking across the server-client boundary without code generation or runtime reflection
vs alternatives: Provides stronger type safety than raw MCP SDK or Anthropic's Claude SDK because it maintains type information end-to-end rather than treating tool calls as untyped JSON, reducing integration bugs in ChatGPT App development
Wraps ChatGPT's injected window.openai global object with declarative React hooks (useToolInfo, useCallTool, useWidgetState, useOpenAiGlobal) that abstract away imperative callback patterns and state management. The hooks handle lifecycle management of tool invocations, state persistence, and environment access within widget iframes. This approach eliminates boilerplate for accessing tool metadata, invoking tools asynchronously, and managing widget-scoped state without requiring developers to interact directly with the low-level window.openai API.
Unique: Provides a complete React hooks layer (useToolInfo, useCallTool, useWidgetState, useOpenAiGlobal) that abstracts the imperative window.openai API into declarative, composable hooks with built-in lifecycle management, eliminating the need for developers to write callback-based integration code
vs alternatives: Simpler and more ergonomic than using window.openai directly because it follows React conventions and eliminates callback hell, while Anthropic's Claude SDK requires manual promise handling and state management in widget contexts
Skybridge provides environment hooks (useEnvironment, useConfig) that inject environment variables and configuration into widgets at runtime, with separate handling for development and production environments. Configuration is defined in a centralized file and automatically injected into widget iframes, eliminating the need for hardcoded values or manual environment variable passing. The system supports environment-specific overrides, allowing different configurations for development, staging, and production deployments.
Unique: Provides environment hooks that inject configuration into widgets at runtime with environment-specific overrides, eliminating hardcoded values while maintaining type safety through TypeScript configuration objects
vs alternatives: More secure than hardcoding API keys because it uses environment variables, while simpler than external secret management systems because it integrates directly into the widget initialization pipeline
Skybridge provides action hooks that enable widgets to trigger MCP tool invocations in response to user events (clicks, form submissions, etc.) without manually managing async state or error handling. These hooks abstract the complexity of tool invocation lifecycle (loading, success, error states) and provide callbacks for handling results. The hooks integrate with React's event system, allowing declarative specification of which tools to invoke on which events.
Unique: Provides action hooks that abstract MCP tool invocation lifecycle (loading, success, error) with React event integration, eliminating manual async state management and error handling boilerplate
vs alternatives: More ergonomic than useCallTool because it handles loading and error states automatically, while simpler than full state management libraries because it's scoped to individual tool invocations
The TemplateHelper class renders widget HTML from Handlebars templates, injecting typed context data derived from tool definitions and widget metadata. Templates can reference tool parameters, descriptions, and other schema information through Handlebars syntax, enabling dynamic UI generation based on tool structure. The system supports both development and production modes, with development mode allowing hot-reload of template changes and production mode bundling templates into optimized assets.
Unique: Integrates Handlebars templating with MCP tool schema context, allowing templates to reference tool metadata directly and render dynamic UI based on tool structure, with separate development and production rendering paths
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded widget HTML because templates can adapt to different tool schemas, but less powerful than React for complex interactive UIs — best suited for form-based or data-display widgets
A custom Vite plugin scans the src/widgets/ directory to discover widget components, bundles each widget as an independent asset, and generates a manifest.json file mapping widget source files to their bundled outputs. The plugin handles both development and production modes: in development, it enables Hot Module Replacement (HMR) for rapid iteration; in production, it optimizes widget bundles for size and performance. The manifest enables the MCP server to locate and serve widget assets dynamically at runtime.
Unique: Implements a Vite plugin that automatically discovers widgets in src/widgets/, bundles them independently, generates a runtime manifest, and provides HMR support — eliminating manual webpack/rollup configuration for multi-widget ChatGPT Apps
vs alternatives: More ergonomic than manual Vite configuration because it handles widget discovery and manifest generation automatically, and provides better DX than raw MCP server setup because HMR enables instant feedback during widget development
Skybridge provides a DevTools application that runs locally during development, offering a web-based UI for testing widgets without deploying to ChatGPT. The DevTools includes a tool panel for selecting and invoking MCP tools, a widget renderer that displays the selected widget's UI, and a development server that serves widget assets with HMR enabled. The DevTools communicates with the MCP server via stdio or HTTP, allowing developers to test tool invocations and widget interactions in an isolated environment before deploying to production.
Unique: Provides an integrated web-based DevTools UI that simulates ChatGPT's widget environment locally, with a tool panel for invoking MCP tools and HMR support for instant widget feedback — eliminating the need to deploy to ChatGPT for every iteration
vs alternatives: More complete than raw MCP testing because it includes a visual widget renderer and tool invocation UI, and faster than ChatGPT deployment because HMR enables instant feedback without network round-trips
The generateHelpers<AppType>() factory function creates a set of typed utility functions scoped to a specific widget's tool context. These helpers provide type-safe wrappers around useCallTool and other hooks, with pre-bound tool names and parameter types inferred from the AppType generic. This eliminates the need to manually specify tool names and types in every hook call, reducing boilerplate and improving IDE autocomplete for tool invocations within a widget.
Unique: Provides a generateHelpers<AppType>() factory that creates typed utility functions for a widget's tools, with parameter types and tool names inferred from the AppType generic — enabling IDE autocomplete and reducing boilerplate in widget code
vs alternatives: More ergonomic than manually typing useCallTool calls because it pre-binds tool names and infers parameter types, while maintaining full type safety without code generation
+4 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs skybridge at 40/100. skybridge leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities