everything-claude-code ranks higher at 57/100 vs supabase-mcp-server at 36/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | supabase-mcp-server | everything-claude-code |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Framework |
| UnfragileRank | 36/100 | 57/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 18 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes PostgreSQL queries against Supabase databases with automatic risk classification into three tiers: Safe (SELECT-only, always allowed), Write (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, requires unsafe mode), and Destructive (DROP/CREATE, requires unsafe mode + explicit confirmation). The system parses incoming SQL, classifies operations by AST analysis, and enforces execution gates based on the current safety mode setting, preventing accidental schema destruction while enabling controlled data mutations.
Unique: Implements a three-tier safety classification system (Safe/Write/Destructive) with explicit confirmation gates for destructive operations, integrated directly into the MCP tool invocation layer rather than as a separate middleware. This allows LLM agents to understand safety constraints at tool-call time and request user confirmation before executing risky operations.
vs alternatives: Safer than raw Supabase client libraries for agentic use because it enforces safety gates at the MCP protocol boundary, preventing LLMs from executing destructive SQL without explicit human confirmation, whereas direct client libraries rely on application-level safeguards that agents can bypass.
Automatically versions and tracks database schema changes by capturing migration metadata (timestamp, operation type, SQL statement) whenever destructive or schema-modifying operations execute. The system maintains a migration history log that can be queried to understand schema evolution, rollback points, and audit trails of who changed what when. This integrates with Supabase's native migration system to ensure version consistency across environments.
Unique: Integrates migration versioning directly into the MCP tool execution layer, automatically capturing and storing migration metadata whenever schema changes occur, rather than requiring developers to manually create migration files. This creates an implicit audit trail of all schema changes made through the chat interface.
vs alternatives: More transparent than manual migration management because every schema change is automatically versioned and logged, whereas traditional Supabase workflows require developers to manually create and track migration files, which can be forgotten or inconsistently documented.
Catches and handles exceptions from database operations, Management API calls, and Auth SDK invocations, preserving error context (stack trace, operation details, input parameters) and returning user-friendly error messages. The system distinguishes between recoverable errors (connection timeouts, rate limits) and fatal errors (authentication failures, invalid SQL), and provides actionable error messages that help developers understand what went wrong. This prevents cryptic error messages from reaching users and enables better debugging.
Unique: Implements custom exception handling that preserves error context (operation details, input parameters) while sanitizing sensitive information before returning to users. This enables detailed debugging without leaking credentials or internal system details.
vs alternatives: More helpful than raw exception messages because it provides context-specific guidance (e.g., 'Invalid credentials — check SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY environment variable'), whereas raw exceptions often lack actionable information.
Provides Dockerfile and Docker Compose configuration for containerizing the MCP server, enabling deployment in Docker environments with environment variable injection for credentials. The system builds a Python 3.12 container with all dependencies, exposes the stdio interface for MCP clients, and supports environment variable configuration for different deployment scenarios. This enables easy deployment to cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure) and local Docker environments without manual setup.
Unique: Provides production-ready Dockerfile and Docker Compose configuration that handles Python dependency installation, environment variable injection, and stdio interface exposure for MCP clients. This enables one-command deployment to container environments.
vs alternatives: More portable than manual installation because Docker ensures consistent environments across development, staging, and production, whereas manual installation can have environment-specific issues (Python version, dependency conflicts).
Provides a testing framework with mock Supabase clients (database, Management API, Auth SDK) for unit testing without real Supabase credentials, and integration tests that run against a real Supabase instance. The system uses pytest for test execution, fixtures for test setup/teardown, and parametrized tests for testing multiple scenarios. This enables developers to test MCP tools locally without requiring a Supabase account and to verify integration with real Supabase services in CI/CD pipelines.
Unique: Provides both unit tests with mock clients and integration tests with real Supabase instances, enabling developers to test locally without credentials and verify integration in CI/CD pipelines. This dual approach balances test speed (mocks) with confidence (integration tests).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than manual testing because automated tests catch regressions and edge cases, whereas manual testing is error-prone and doesn't scale as the codebase grows.
Provides MCP tool bindings for all Supabase Management API endpoints (project management, database configuration, auth settings, etc.) with automatic risk assessment and safety controls. The system maps Management API operations to MCP tools, injects project references automatically, classifies each endpoint by risk level (read-only vs destructive), and enforces safety gates similar to SQL execution. This enables chat-driven management of Supabase project infrastructure without requiring manual API calls or authentication.
Unique: Automatically injects project references and applies the same three-tier safety classification system (Safe/Write/Destructive) to Management API endpoints as it does to SQL queries, creating a unified safety model across database and infrastructure operations. This prevents accidental project-level destructive operations (e.g., database resets) without explicit confirmation.
vs alternatives: More accessible than raw Management API clients because it abstracts authentication, project reference injection, and safety gates into MCP tools that LLMs can safely invoke, whereas direct API clients require manual authentication handling and provide no guardrails against destructive operations.
Exposes Supabase Auth Admin SDK methods as MCP tools, enabling chat-driven user management operations including user creation, updates, deletion, authentication operations (magic links, password recovery), and MFA management. The system wraps Auth Admin SDK calls with proper error handling, validates input parameters, and integrates with the safety system to require confirmation for destructive user operations (deletion, password resets). This allows developers to manage authentication state and user accounts without leaving their IDE.
Unique: Wraps the Supabase Auth Admin SDK with MCP tool bindings and integrates user deletion/password reset operations into the safety system, requiring explicit confirmation before destructive auth operations. This prevents LLMs from accidentally deleting user accounts or forcing password resets without human approval.
vs alternatives: Safer than direct Auth Admin SDK usage in agentic contexts because it enforces confirmation gates for destructive user operations, whereas raw SDK clients allow agents to delete users or reset passwords without safeguards, risking data loss and user disruption.
Provides MCP tools to query Supabase logs across multiple collections (postgres, api_gateway, auth, realtime, etc.) with filtering by time range, search text, and custom criteria. The system constructs log queries using Supabase's log API, handles pagination for large result sets, and returns structured log entries as JSON objects. This enables developers to troubleshoot issues, monitor application behavior, and analyze performance without leaving their IDE or switching to the Supabase dashboard.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's multi-collection log API into MCP tools with automatic pagination and structured result formatting, allowing LLM agents to query logs conversationally without understanding the underlying log API schema. This abstracts log collection names, filter syntax, and pagination logic into simple tool parameters.
vs alternatives: More accessible than raw log API clients because it provides high-level filtering and search without requiring knowledge of Supabase's log query syntax, whereas direct API clients require developers to construct complex filter objects and handle pagination manually.
+5 more capabilities
Implements a hierarchical agent system where multiple specialized agents (Observer, Skill Creator, Evaluator, etc.) coordinate through a central harness using pre/post-tool-use hooks and session-based context passing. Agents delegate subtasks via explicit hand-off patterns defined in agent.yaml, with state synchronized through SQLite-backed session persistence and strategic context window compaction to prevent token overflow during multi-step workflows.
Unique: Uses a hook-based pre/post-tool-use interception system combined with SQLite session persistence and strategic context compaction to enable stateful multi-agent coordination without requiring external orchestration platforms. The Observer Agent pattern detects execution patterns and feeds them into the Continuous Learning v2 system for autonomous skill evolution.
vs alternatives: Unlike LangChain's sequential agent chains or AutoGen's message-passing model, ECC integrates directly into IDE workflows with persistent session state and automatic context optimization, enabling tighter coupling with Claude's native capabilities.
Implements a closed-loop learning pipeline (Continuous Learning v2 Architecture) where an Observer Agent monitors code execution patterns, detects recurring problems, and automatically generates new skills via the Skill Creator. Instincts are structured as pattern-matching rules stored in SQLite, evolved through an evaluation system that tracks skill health metrics, and scoped to individual projects to prevent cross-project interference. The evolution pipeline includes observation → pattern detection → skill generation → evaluation → integration into the active skill set.
Unique: Combines Observer Agent pattern detection with automatic Skill Creator integration and SQLite-backed instinct persistence, enabling autonomous skill generation without manual prompt engineering. Project-scoped learning prevents skill pollution across different codebases, and the evaluation system provides feedback loops for skill health tracking.
everything-claude-code scores higher at 57/100 vs supabase-mcp-server at 36/100. supabase-mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while everything-claude-code is stronger on adoption.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Unlike static prompt libraries or manual skill curation, ECC's continuous learning automatically discovers and evolves skills based on actual execution patterns, with project isolation preventing cross-project interference that plagues global knowledge bases.
Provides a Checkpoint & Verification Workflow that creates savepoints of project state at key milestones, verifies code quality and functionality at each checkpoint, and enables rollback to previous checkpoints if verification fails. Checkpoints are stored in session state with full context snapshots, and verification uses the Plankton Code Quality System and Evaluation System to assess quality. The workflow integrates with version control to track checkpoint history.
Unique: Creates savepoints of project state with integrated verification and rollback capability, enabling safe exploration of changes with ability to revert to known-good states. Checkpoints are tracked in version control for audit trails.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual version control commits or external backup systems, ECC's checkpoint workflow integrates verification directly into the savepoint process, ensuring checkpoints represent verified, quality-assured states.
Implements Autonomous Loop Patterns that enable agents to self-direct task execution without human intervention, using the planning-reasoning system to decompose tasks, execute them through agent delegation, and verify results through evaluation. Loops can be configured with termination conditions (max iterations, success criteria, token budget) and include safeguards to prevent infinite loops. The Observer Agent monitors loop execution and feeds patterns into continuous learning.
Unique: Enables self-directed agent execution with configurable termination conditions and integrated safety guardrails, using the planning-reasoning system to decompose tasks and agent delegation to execute subtasks. Observer Agent monitors execution patterns for continuous learning.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual step-by-step agent control or external orchestration platforms, ECC's autonomous loops integrate task decomposition, execution, and verification into a self-contained workflow with built-in safeguards.
Provides Token Optimization Strategies that monitor token usage across agent execution, identify high-cost operations, and apply optimization techniques (context compaction, selective context inclusion, prompt compression) to reduce token consumption. Context Window Management tracks available tokens per platform and automatically adjusts context inclusion strategies to stay within limits. The system includes token budgeting per task and alerts when approaching limits.
Unique: Combines token usage monitoring with heuristic-based optimization strategies (context compaction, selective inclusion, prompt compression) and per-task budgeting to keep token consumption within limits while preserving essential context.
vs alternatives: Unlike static context window management or post-hoc cost analysis, ECC's token optimization actively monitors and optimizes token usage during execution, applying multiple strategies to stay within budgets.
Implements a Package Manager System that enables installation, versioning, and distribution of skills, rules, and commands as packages. Packages are defined in manifest files (install-modules.json) with dependency specifications, and the package manager handles dependency resolution, conflict detection, and selective installation. Packages can be installed from local directories, Git repositories, or package registries, and the system tracks installed versions for reproducibility.
Unique: Provides a package manager for skills and rules with dependency resolution, conflict detection, and support for multiple package sources (Git, local, registry). Packages are versioned for reproducibility and tracked for audit trails.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual skill copying or monolithic skill repositories, ECC's package manager enables modular skill distribution with dependency management and version control.
Automatically detects project type, framework, and structure by analyzing codebase patterns, package manifests, and configuration files. Infers project context (language, framework, testing patterns, coding standards) and uses this to select appropriate skills, rules, and commands. The system maintains a project detection cache to avoid repeated analysis and integrates with the CLAUDE.md context file for explicit project metadata.
Unique: Automatically detects project type and infers context by analyzing codebase patterns and configuration files, enabling zero-configuration setup where Claude adapts to project structure without manual specification.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual project configuration or static project templates, ECC's project detection automatically adapts to diverse project structures and infers context from codebase patterns.
Integrates the Plankton Code Quality System for structural analysis of generated code using language-specific parsers (tree-sitter for 40+ languages) instead of regex-based matching. Provides metrics for code complexity, maintainability, test coverage, and style violations. Plankton integrates with the Evaluation System to track code quality trends and with the Skill Creator to generate quality-focused skills.
Unique: Uses tree-sitter AST parsing for 40+ languages to provide structurally-aware code quality analysis instead of regex-based matching, enabling accurate metrics for complexity, maintainability, and style violations.
vs alternatives: More accurate than regex-based linters because it uses language-specific AST parsing to understand code structure, enabling detection of complex quality issues that regex patterns cannot capture.
+10 more capabilities