| Ecosystem |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Classifies Portuguese-language financial text into sentiment categories (positive, negative, neutral) using a BERT-based transformer fine-tuned on financial domain corpora. The model leverages masked language modeling pre-training followed by supervised fine-tuning on labeled financial documents, enabling it to capture domain-specific terminology and sentiment patterns in Portuguese financial discourse without requiring manual feature engineering.
Unique: Purpose-built for Portuguese financial text through domain-specific fine-tuning on financial corpora, rather than generic multilingual models — captures financial terminology, regulatory language, and market-specific sentiment patterns unique to Portuguese-speaking financial markets
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic Portuguese BERT models and multilingual models (mBERT, XLM-R) on financial sentiment tasks due to domain-specific training, while remaining lightweight enough for edge deployment compared to larger instruction-tuned models
Generates fixed-dimensional dense vector embeddings (768-dimensional) for Portuguese financial text by extracting the [CLS] token representation from the final transformer layer. These embeddings capture semantic meaning in a continuous vector space, enabling downstream tasks like similarity search, clustering, and retrieval without requiring additional fine-tuning. The model uses the standard BERT pooling strategy where the [CLS] token aggregates contextual information across the entire input sequence.
Unique: Embeddings are derived from a financial-domain-specific BERT variant rather than generic language models — the [CLS] representation encodes financial terminology and market-specific semantic relationships learned during domain fine-tuning, producing embeddings optimized for financial document similarity rather than general-purpose text similarity
vs alternatives: Produces more semantically meaningful embeddings for financial documents than generic Portuguese embeddings (e.g., from mBERT or XLM-R) because the underlying model was fine-tuned on financial corpora, capturing domain-specific relationships that generic models miss
Supports deployment across multiple inference backends including HuggingFace Inference Endpoints, Azure ML, and text-embeddings-inference (TEI) via standardized model artifact exports. The model can be served through REST APIs, containerized inference servers, or integrated into ML pipelines without code changes by leveraging the transformers library's unified model loading interface and ONNX export capabilities for hardware-accelerated inference.
Unique: Model is pre-configured for multi-provider deployment with explicit support for HuggingFace Endpoints, Azure ML, and TEI — the model card includes deployment templates and configuration examples for each platform, reducing boilerplate and enabling rapid production deployment without custom integration code
vs alternatives: Faster time-to-production than self-hosted models because it's pre-optimized for major cloud platforms with documented deployment paths, whereas generic BERT models require custom containerization and infrastructure setup
Provides a pre-trained checkpoint optimized for financial text that can be further fine-tuned on downstream tasks (e.g., entity extraction, aspect-based sentiment, risk classification) using standard HuggingFace Trainer API or custom training loops. The model's weights encode financial domain knowledge from pre-training, reducing the amount of labeled data required for task-specific fine-tuning compared to generic BERT — typically 10-50% less labeled data needed for convergence on financial tasks.
Unique: Pre-trained weights encode financial domain knowledge from supervised fine-tuning on financial corpora, enabling more efficient transfer learning than generic BERT — downstream fine-tuning converges faster and with fewer labeled examples because the model has already learned financial terminology and sentiment patterns
vs alternatives: Requires 30-50% fewer labeled examples to achieve equivalent performance on financial tasks compared to fine-tuning generic BERT models, due to domain-specific pre-training that captures financial language patterns
Exposes transformer attention weights from all 12 layers and 12 attention heads, enabling visualization and analysis of which input tokens the model attends to when making sentiment predictions. Attention patterns can be extracted and visualized using tools like BertViz or custom analysis scripts to understand which financial terms, entities, or phrases drive the model's classification decisions — useful for validating model behavior and building trust in production systems.
Unique: Attention weights are extracted from a financial-domain-specific BERT model, making attention patterns more interpretable for financial text — the model's attention heads have learned to focus on financial terminology and sentiment indicators during domain fine-tuning, producing more meaningful attention visualizations than generic BERT
vs alternatives: Attention patterns from FinBERT-PT-BR are more interpretable for financial documents than generic BERT because the model has learned domain-specific attention patterns; combined with financial-specific tokenization, attention visualizations reveal which financial terms drive predictions
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to perform chained mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparisons) across both structured tables and unstructured text extracted from SEC filings. The dataset provides ground-truth question-answer pairs where answers require synthesizing data from multiple locations within earnings reports and applying sequential arithmetic operations, testing whether models can decompose complex financial queries into discrete computational steps.
Unique: Combines real SEC filing documents (not synthetic) with crowdsourced questions requiring multi-step arithmetic, creating a hybrid dataset that tests both domain knowledge extraction and quantitative reasoning in a single evaluation task. Unlike generic math word problems, answers require locating figures within 10+ page documents first.
vs alternatives: More challenging than DROP or SVAMP because it requires financial domain knowledge AND document retrieval before arithmetic, whereas generic math benchmarks assume figures are already extracted
Assesses whether AI systems understand financial terminology, accounting concepts, and domain-specific metrics by requiring them to answer questions about real earnings reports from S&P 500 companies. The dataset tests recognition of financial line items (revenue, COGS, operating expenses, net income), ability to distinguish between different financial statements (income statement vs balance sheet), and understanding of financial ratios and metrics without explicit instruction on their definitions.
Unique: Uses authentic SEC filings rather than synthetic financial data, exposing models to real-world accounting variations, footnote complexity, and the actual structure of professional financial documents. This tests transfer learning from general text to specialized domain without domain-specific pretraining.
vs alternatives: More authentic than synthetic financial QA datasets because it uses real earnings reports with their inherent complexity, but narrower than general financial knowledge benchmarks because it focuses only on historical data interpretation
FinQA scores higher at 60/100 vs FinBERT-PT-BR at 41/100. FinBERT-PT-BR leads on ecosystem, while FinQA is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to extract numerical data from both structured HTML/text tables and unstructured prose within the same document, then reason over the extracted values. The dataset contains questions where relevant data appears in different formats — some figures are in formatted tables with clear row/column headers, while others are embedded in narrative text or footnotes — requiring robust parsing and entity linking before computation can occur.
Unique: Combines structured table data with unstructured narrative in the same evaluation, forcing systems to handle format heterogeneity and resolve references across different data representations. Most table QA datasets use clean, isolated tables; this tests real-world document complexity.
vs alternatives: More realistic than isolated table QA benchmarks (like SQA or WikiTableQuestions) because it requires handling narrative context and format mixing, but simpler than full document understanding because tables are already in text format (no OCR needed)
Provides a curated, crowdsourced-annotated dataset of 8,281 question-answer pairs with multi-step reasoning requirements, enabling systematic evaluation of AI systems on financial numerical reasoning. The dataset includes quality control mechanisms through crowdworker annotation, answer validation against ground truth, and coverage across diverse financial metrics and company types within the S&P 500, creating a reproducible evaluation standard for the financial AI community.
Unique: Provides a publicly available, reproducible benchmark specifically designed for financial numerical reasoning with real SEC filings, enabling standardized comparison across different financial AI systems. Most financial datasets are proprietary or synthetic; this is open-source and authentic.
vs alternatives: More specialized and challenging than generic QA benchmarks (SQuAD, MRQA) because it requires financial domain knowledge and multi-step arithmetic, but narrower in scope than comprehensive financial understanding benchmarks because it focuses only on numerical reasoning
Assesses AI systems' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning by requiring them to locate and combine information from different sections of earnings reports. Questions may require finding a figure in the income statement, then locating a related metric in the balance sheet, then performing arithmetic across both — testing whether models can maintain context across document boundaries and understand relationships between different financial statement sections.
Unique: Embeds multi-hop reasoning requirements within authentic financial documents where hops correspond to real relationships between financial statement sections, rather than synthetic reasoning chains. This tests whether models understand domain structure, not just generic multi-hop patterns.
vs alternatives: More realistic than synthetic multi-hop datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA) because reasoning hops follow actual financial relationships, but less controlled because document structure varies and reasoning paths are implicit rather than explicitly annotated
Enables evaluation of whether AI systems can identify which arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison) are required to answer financial questions, then execute them correctly. The dataset implicitly tests operation selection — a question asking 'what is the profit margin' requires division (net income / revenue), while 'what is total assets' requires addition — forcing models to understand financial semantics before applying math.
Unique: Embeds arithmetic operation selection within financial domain context, requiring models to understand that 'margin' semantically maps to division and 'total' maps to addition. This tests semantic grounding of operations, not just arithmetic execution.
vs alternatives: More semantically grounded than generic math word problem datasets because operation selection is implicit in financial terminology, but less explicit than datasets with annotated operation types because operations must be inferred
Provides evaluation capability for AI systems to compare financial metrics across multiple S&P 500 companies or aggregate metrics across different time periods within the same company's earnings reports. While individual questions reference single documents, the dataset structure enables evaluation of systems that can retrieve and compare relevant companies, requiring understanding of which metrics are comparable across entities and how to normalize for company size or accounting differences.
Unique: Provides a foundation for evaluating cross-company financial comparison by including diverse S&P 500 companies with different business models and scales, enabling assessment of whether systems can normalize and compare metrics appropriately. Most financial QA datasets focus on single-document questions.
vs alternatives: Enables cross-company evaluation unlike single-document QA datasets, but requires external retrieval and comparison logic because the dataset itself contains only single-document questions