| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 5 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically generates and maintains table of contents (TOC) files across the repository using a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers on main branch pushes and PR merges. The system uses Python scripts (idxtool.py, gptparser.py) to enumerate prompt files, parse their metadata, and rebuild TOC.md files in the root and all subdirectories under /prompts/, ensuring navigation links remain current as new prompts are added or modified without manual intervention.
Unique: Uses a dual-script approach (idxtool.py for orchestration, gptparser.py for metadata extraction) with GitHub Actions automation to maintain consistency across 1,100+ prompts organized in three separate collections (gpts, official-product, opensource-prj), each with its own TOC hierarchy. The rebuild_toc() and generate_toc_for_prompts_dirs() functions ensure both root-level and subdirectory TOCs stay synchronized.
vs alternatives: More automated than manual TOC maintenance and more scalable than static documentation, but less sophisticated than full-text search indices or semantic navigation systems that some larger documentation projects use.
Parses markdown prompt files using gptparser.py to extract and standardize metadata fields (name, description, author, tags, etc.) from YAML frontmatter and markdown headers. The parser maintains a dictionary of supported fields with display names and processing order, enabling consistent formatting across heterogeneous prompt sources (official OpenAI/Anthropic products, community GPTs, open-source projects) and enabling downstream indexing and search capabilities.
Unique: Implements a field-mapping dictionary that defines both display names and processing order for metadata fields, allowing flexible extraction from heterogeneous prompt sources (ChatGPT system prompts, Claude Code system, Grok jailbreak prompts, custom GPTs) without requiring source-specific parsers. The gptparser.py module handles both YAML frontmatter and markdown-embedded metadata.
vs alternatives: More flexible than regex-based extraction because it uses structured YAML parsing, but less robust than full AST-based markdown parsing (e.g., tree-sitter) which would handle edge cases like nested code blocks or escaped characters.
Documents patterns and system prompts for custom GPTs and development IDE assistants (including Grimoire Coding Assistant and other specialized tools) organized in /prompts/gpts/. The collection includes 1,100+ examples of how developers structure prompts for specific domains (coding, finance, education, etc.), providing a comprehensive reference for understanding custom GPT design patterns and specialized assistant architectures.
Unique: Aggregates 1,100+ custom GPT prompts organized by domain (coding, finance, education, etc.) with specific examples like Grimoire Coding Assistant, providing a comprehensive reference for understanding how developers structure prompts for specialized tasks. The scale (1,100+ examples) enables pattern analysis across diverse use cases.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than individual GPT examples because it provides 1,100+ patterns in one place, but less curated than specialized prompt engineering courses or frameworks that provide guided learning paths.
Aggregates and organizes system prompts from three distinct sources (official-product: ChatGPT/Claude/Grok, gpts: 1,100+ community-created custom GPTs, opensource-prj: open-source AI projects) into a unified repository structure with separate TOC hierarchies. The architecture uses directory-based organization (/prompts/gpts/, /prompts/official-product/, /prompts/opensource-prj/) to maintain source separation while enabling cross-source discovery and comparison through unified indexing.
Unique: Maintains three parallel prompt collections (official-product with 141+ entries, gpts with 1,100+ entries, opensource-prj with 20+ entries) in separate directory hierarchies, each with its own TOC, enabling both source-specific browsing and cross-source comparison. The architecture preserves source identity while enabling unified discovery through the root-level TOC.md.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than vendor-specific prompt collections (e.g., OpenAI's official docs alone) because it includes community contributions and competing vendors, but less curated than specialized prompt marketplaces that apply quality filters or user ratings.
Documents and catalogs prompt injection techniques, jailbreak methods, and prompt leaking knowledge as a research and educational resource. The repository includes specific files like GrokJailbreakPrompt.md and security-focused documentation (SECURITY.md) that explain how system prompts can be extracted, bypassed, or manipulated, serving as both a learning resource and a reference for understanding AI safety vulnerabilities.
Unique: Explicitly documents prompt injection and jailbreak techniques (e.g., GrokJailbreakPrompt.md) as part of the repository's educational mission, treating security vulnerabilities as learning opportunities rather than hiding them. The SECURITY.md file provides contribution guidelines for responsibly documenting vulnerabilities.
vs alternatives: More transparent and educational than vendor security advisories that often withhold technical details, but less systematic than academic security research papers that provide formal vulnerability taxonomies and impact assessments.
Enables discovery and browsing of 1,100+ community-created custom GPTs through hierarchical organization by category (coding, finance, education, etc.) with automated TOC generation and file enumeration. The enum_gpts() and find_gptfile() functions in idxtool.py support both directory-based browsing and ID/URL-based lookup, allowing users to search for GPTs by name, category, or functionality without requiring a database backend.
Unique: Implements enum_gpts() and find_gptfile() functions that enable both directory-based enumeration and ID/URL-based lookup of 1,100+ custom GPTs without requiring a database or search index. The file naming convention (e.g., tveXvXU5g_QuantFinance.md) embeds the GPT ID, enabling reverse lookup from URL to local file.
vs alternatives: More accessible than the official OpenAI GPT Store because it provides source-level access to system prompts and configuration, but less discoverable than the GPT Store's UI-based search and recommendation system.
Enables side-by-side comparison of system prompts from different AI vendors (OpenAI ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude, xAI Grok, Google AI tools) by organizing official product prompts in /prompts/official-product/ with vendor-specific subdirectories. Users can examine how different vendors structure instructions, handle edge cases, and implement safety guidelines by reading and comparing prompts like ChatGPT system.md, Claude Code System, and Grok2.md/Grok3.md files.
Unique: Maintains official product prompts from multiple competing vendors (OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Google) in a single repository, enabling direct comparison of instruction-following approaches. The /prompts/official-product/ directory includes vendor-specific subdirectories (chatwise, manus, xai) with multiple versions (e.g., Grok2.md, Grok3.md, Grok3WithDeepSearch.md) showing how vendors iterate on their system prompts.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than individual vendor documentation because it aggregates multiple vendors in one place, but less authoritative than official vendor documentation and may lag behind actual deployed prompts.
Provides structured contribution guidelines (CONTRIBUTING.md) and security policies (SECURITY.md) that define how community members can submit new prompts, validate metadata, and ensure quality standards. The workflow integrates with GitHub's pull request system and automated TOC generation, enabling contributors to add new prompts without manually updating indices while maintaining repository integrity through validation checks.
Unique: Integrates contribution guidelines with automated TOC generation, allowing contributors to submit new prompts via pull requests without manually updating indices. The SECURITY.md file provides specific guidance for responsibly disclosing prompt injection and jailbreak techniques, treating security vulnerabilities as educational opportunities rather than suppressing them.
vs alternatives: More community-friendly than closed prompt collections because it enables open contributions, but less structured than platforms with automated quality checks, duplicate detection, or contributor reputation systems.
+3 more capabilities
ChatGPT utilizes a transformer-based architecture to generate responses based on the context of the conversation. It employs attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different parts of the input text, allowing it to maintain context over multiple turns of dialogue. This enables it to provide coherent and contextually relevant responses that evolve as the conversation progresses.
Unique: ChatGPT's use of fine-tuning on conversational datasets allows it to better understand nuances in dialogue compared to other models that may not be specifically trained for conversation.
vs alternatives: More contextually aware than many rule-based chatbots, as it leverages deep learning for understanding and generating human-like dialogue.
ChatGPT employs a multi-layered neural network that analyzes user input to identify intent dynamically. It uses embeddings to represent user queries and matches them against a vast array of learned intents, enabling it to adapt responses based on the user's needs in real-time. This capability allows for more personalized and relevant interactions.
Unique: The model's ability to leverage contextual embeddings for intent recognition sets it apart from simpler keyword-based systems, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of user queries.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional keyword matching systems, as it understands context and intent rather than relying solely on predefined keywords.
ChatGPT manages multi-turn dialogues by maintaining a conversation history that informs its responses. It uses a sliding window approach to keep track of recent exchanges, ensuring that the context remains relevant and coherent. This allows it to handle complex interactions where user queries may refer back to previous statements.
ChatGPT scores higher at 43/100 vs chatgpt_system_prompt at 31/100. However, chatgpt_system_prompt offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: The implementation of a dynamic context management system allows ChatGPT to effectively manage and reference prior interactions, unlike simpler models that may reset context after each response.
vs alternatives: Superior to basic chatbots that lack memory, as it can recall and reference previous messages to maintain a coherent conversation.
ChatGPT can summarize lengthy texts by analyzing the content and extracting key points while maintaining the original context. It utilizes attention mechanisms to focus on the most relevant parts of the text, allowing it to generate concise summaries that capture essential information without losing meaning.
Unique: ChatGPT's summarization capability is enhanced by its ability to maintain context through attention mechanisms, which allows it to produce more coherent and relevant summaries compared to simpler models.
vs alternatives: More effective than traditional summarization tools that rely on extractive methods, as it can generate summaries that are both concise and contextually accurate.
ChatGPT can modify its tone and style based on user preferences or contextual cues. It analyzes the input text to determine the desired tone and adjusts its responses accordingly, whether the user prefers formal, casual, or technical language. This capability enhances user engagement by tailoring interactions to individual preferences.
Unique: The ability to adapt tone and style dynamically based on user input distinguishes ChatGPT from static response systems that lack this level of personalization.
vs alternatives: More responsive than traditional chatbots that provide fixed responses, as it can tailor its language style to match user preferences.