| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 15 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Enables freeform conversational chat with LLM models from 15+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, DeepSeek, local Ollama, etc.) by maintaining a provider abstraction layer that normalizes API calls across different chat model interfaces. Context is injected from selected notes, folders, or tags via a context envelope system that prepares markdown content for inclusion in the prompt. The plugin streams responses token-by-token back to the chat UI, maintaining conversation history as persistent markdown notes in the vault.
Unique: Implements a provider abstraction layer (ChatModelProviders enum in src/constants.ts) that normalizes API calls across 15+ heterogeneous LLM providers, allowing users to swap providers without workflow disruption. Context envelope system selectively injects markdown from vault notes/folders/tags, avoiding token limit overflow. Responses streamed directly into Obsidian chat UI with conversation persistence as markdown files.
vs alternatives: Supports more LLM providers natively than Copilot for VS Code (which is OpenAI-only) and maintains local-first option via Ollama, while keeping all chat history in user's vault rather than external cloud storage.
Provides dual-mode search across the entire vault: BM25+ lexical search (free tier) for keyword-based retrieval and optional embedding-backed vector search (Orama or Miyo) for semantic similarity matching. The indexing system maintains an inverted index of vault notes and can optionally compute embeddings via external providers. When a user queries, the system retrieves relevant notes ranked by relevance and injects them as context into the LLM chat, enabling vault-wide question-answering without manual note selection.
Unique: Implements a hybrid search strategy combining BM25+ lexical indexing (free, fast, keyword-aware) with optional embedding-backed vector search (semantic, requires external API). The indexing system (src/indexing) maintains an inverted index and can optionally compute embeddings via Orama or Miyo. Retrieval results are automatically injected into chat context without user intervention.
vs alternatives: Hybrid BM25+semantic approach is more robust than pure vector search (which fails on exact keyword matches) and more semantically aware than pure lexical search, while remaining free at the BM25 tier unlike competitors requiring embedding APIs.
Allows users on the self-host tier to replace Brevilabs-hosted backend services with self-hosted alternatives: Miyo (embedding service), Firecrawl (web scraping and document conversion), and Perplexity (web search). This enables fully local deployments where no data leaves the user's infrastructure, addressing privacy and compliance requirements. Configuration is via settings UI where users provide URLs to their self-hosted services.
Unique: Implements a pluggable backend architecture where Brevilabs-hosted services (Miyo, Firecrawl, Perplexity) can be replaced with self-hosted alternatives via configuration URLs. Users on the self-host tier can deploy their own instances and point the plugin to them, enabling fully local deployments. No code changes required — configuration is via settings UI.
vs alternatives: Enables fully local deployments unlike free/plus tiers which require Brevilabs backend. More flexible than single-provider solutions because users can mix self-hosted and cloud services. Requires premium subscription and operational overhead for self-hosting.
Automatically saves chat conversations as markdown files in the vault, with each conversation stored as a separate note containing the full message history (user messages, AI responses, timestamps). Users can browse, search, and reference past conversations like any other vault note. Conversation files are stored in a designated folder and can be organized by date, project, or custom tags.
Unique: Implements automatic conversation persistence by appending each chat message to a markdown file in the vault. Conversations are stored as separate notes with timestamps and can be searched using Obsidian's native search. No external database required — all history is stored as markdown files in the vault.
vs alternatives: More integrated than ChatGPT's conversation history because conversations are stored in the user's vault and searchable. More transparent than cloud-based chat history because users can directly edit and version-control conversation files. Simpler than external conversation databases because it leverages Obsidian's file system.
Implements a provider abstraction layer (ChatModelProviders enum in src/constants.ts) that normalizes API calls across 15+ heterogeneous LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, DeepSeek, Mistral, Ollama, LM Studio, etc.). The abstraction handles provider-specific authentication, request/response formatting, streaming protocols, and error handling. Users can switch providers in settings without changing their workflow, and the plugin automatically adapts to each provider's capabilities (e.g., function calling, vision, etc.).
Unique: Implements a provider abstraction layer that normalizes API calls across 15+ providers by defining a common interface and provider-specific adapters. Each provider adapter handles authentication, request formatting, streaming, and error handling. The abstraction allows users to switch providers in settings without code changes. Supports both cloud (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq) and local (Ollama, LM Studio) models.
vs alternatives: Supports more providers natively than most competitors (15+ vs 2-3 for most tools). Includes local model support (Ollama, LM Studio) unlike cloud-only solutions. Abstraction is transparent to users — no code required to switch providers.
Streams LLM responses token-by-token directly into the Obsidian chat UI, rendering each token as it arrives from the provider. This provides real-time feedback to users and reduces perceived latency compared to waiting for the full response. The streaming implementation handles provider-specific streaming protocols (Server-Sent Events for OpenAI, streaming for Anthropic, etc.) and gracefully handles network interruptions.
Unique: Implements token-by-token streaming by handling provider-specific streaming protocols (Server-Sent Events for OpenAI, streaming for Anthropic, etc.) and rendering each token to the chat UI as it arrives. Streaming is transparent to users — no configuration required. Supports cancellation of in-flight requests.
vs alternatives: More responsive than batch response rendering because users see results in real-time. Supports multiple streaming protocols unlike single-provider solutions. Reduces perceived latency compared to waiting for full response.
Provides a comprehensive settings interface where users configure LLM providers (API keys, model names, endpoints), embedding providers, search settings, and plugin behavior. The settings UI includes dropdowns for provider selection, text fields for API keys, and toggles for optional features. Settings are persisted to Obsidian's local storage and validated on save. The UI dynamically shows provider-specific options (e.g., Azure OpenAI requires endpoint URL and deployment name).
Unique: Implements a settings UI that dynamically shows provider-specific options based on the selected provider. Settings are persisted to Obsidian's local storage and validated on save. The UI includes dropdowns for provider/model selection, text fields for API keys and URLs, and toggles for optional features. No code required to configure — all settings are UI-driven.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than environment variables or config files because settings are managed via UI. Supports provider-specific options (e.g., Azure OpenAI endpoint) unlike generic settings. Integrated into Obsidian's settings panel unlike external configuration tools.
Allows users to request AI-generated edits to notes via a 'Composer' mode that generates suggested changes, displays them as a side-by-side diff, and applies them back to the vault with a single click. The system uses the LLM to generate edited markdown content, compares it against the original note, and renders the diff in the UI. Users can accept or reject changes before they're written back to disk, providing a safety mechanism for AI-assisted writing.
Unique: Implements a Composer mode that generates AI edits, computes a diff against the original note, and renders it in the Obsidian UI with one-click apply/reject. This provides a safety layer between LLM generation and vault persistence — users see exactly what will change before committing. The diff is computed client-side, avoiding round-trips to the LLM.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit diff preview before applying changes, unlike ChatGPT which requires manual copy-paste and comparison. More integrated than external editors because changes are applied directly to vault files with Obsidian's native file system integration.
+7 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs obsidian-copilot at 35/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities