| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Performs intelligent image inpainting that respects lighting conditions by using a diffusion-based approach with spatial conditioning maps. The system accepts a base image, a mask defining regions to modify, and optional lighting direction hints, then generates photorealistic inpainted content that matches the scene's illumination. This works by encoding spatial information as additional conditioning inputs to a latent diffusion model, allowing the network to understand which areas need modification and how lighting should flow across the scene.
Unique: Uses spatial conditioning maps as additional diffusion model inputs to encode lighting direction and mask information simultaneously, rather than simple concatenation or cross-attention approaches. This allows the model to generate inpainted content that inherently respects the scene's light source direction without post-processing.
vs alternatives: Produces more photorealistic inpainting than generic diffusion inpainting tools (like Stable Diffusion inpaint) because it explicitly conditions on lighting geometry, reducing artifacts like inconsistent shadows or unnatural specular highlights.
Provides a web-based drawing interface for users to define inpaint regions through freehand painting, polygon selection, or brush-based masking. The interface uses HTML5 Canvas for real-time mask visualization with adjustable brush size and opacity, allowing users to iteratively refine which areas of the image should be modified. The mask is converted to a binary tensor and passed to the inpainting model as a conditioning signal.
Unique: Implements real-time mask visualization using Canvas compositing with adjustable opacity overlays, allowing users to see exactly which pixels will be inpainted before submission. The mask is maintained as a separate Canvas layer and composited on-demand, avoiding expensive image redraws.
vs alternatives: More intuitive than text-based coordinate input or API-only masking because it provides immediate visual feedback and supports freehand selection, making it accessible to non-technical users without requiring knowledge of mask file formats.
Exposes lighting direction as an adjustable 3D vector (or spherical coordinates) through UI sliders or input fields, allowing users to specify the direction from which light should appear to come in the inpainted region. The system converts these parameters into a conditioning tensor that guides the diffusion model's generation process. Users can preview how different lighting angles affect the inpainting result through iterative generation.
Unique: Exposes lighting as a first-class parameter in the UI rather than burying it in advanced settings, with direct mapping to diffusion model conditioning. The system uses spherical or Cartesian coordinate representation to make lighting intuitive for 3D-literate users.
vs alternatives: Gives users explicit control over lighting direction unlike generic inpainting tools that infer lighting implicitly from context, enabling more predictable and controllable results in professional workflows.
Supports processing multiple images sequentially through a queue-based system, where users can upload several images with their corresponding masks and lighting parameters, and the system processes them in order on available GPU resources. The Gradio interface manages the queue, displaying progress for each image and allowing users to cancel or reorder jobs. This is implemented using Gradio's built-in queue system with configurable concurrency limits.
Unique: Leverages Gradio's native queue system with configurable concurrency, avoiding custom job scheduling infrastructure. The queue integrates directly with the web interface, allowing users to monitor progress without external tools.
vs alternatives: Simpler to use than setting up a separate job queue system (like Celery or RQ) because it's built into the Gradio framework, but less flexible for complex scheduling or priority-based processing.
Executes the core inpainting diffusion model (likely a fine-tuned variant of Stable Diffusion or similar) on GPU hardware, performing iterative denoising steps to generate inpainted content. The system loads the model weights into VRAM, accepts conditioning inputs (mask, lighting direction), and runs the forward pass for a configurable number of diffusion steps (typically 20-50). This is implemented using PyTorch with CUDA/ROCm backends for GPU acceleration.
Unique: Implements lighting-aware conditioning by injecting spatial maps into the diffusion model's cross-attention layers, rather than relying solely on text prompts or implicit context. This allows precise control over lighting direction without requiring complex prompt engineering.
vs alternatives: Faster than CPU-based inference by 50-100x due to GPU parallelization of matrix operations, and produces higher-quality results than simpler inpainting methods (like content-aware fill) because it leverages learned generative priors from large-scale training.
Provides a user-friendly web interface built with Gradio, a Python framework for rapidly prototyping ML applications. The interface includes image upload, mask drawing canvas, lighting parameter sliders, and result display, all without requiring custom HTML/CSS/JavaScript. Gradio automatically handles form submission, file I/O, and result rendering, while the backend Python code defines the processing logic. The app is deployed on HuggingFace Spaces, which provides free GPU resources and automatic scaling.
Unique: Leverages Gradio's declarative interface definition, where the entire UI is defined in ~50 lines of Python code without manual HTML/CSS. This enables rapid iteration and deployment to HuggingFace Spaces with zero DevOps overhead.
vs alternatives: Dramatically faster to deploy than building a custom React/FastAPI stack because Gradio handles routing, file handling, and UI rendering automatically. However, less flexible for advanced customization compared to a full-stack web application.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs IC-Light at 20/100. IC-Light leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities