Live LLM Token Counter vs IntelliCode
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Live LLM Token Counter | IntelliCode |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 31/100 | 39/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Counts tokens for selected text or entire open document using embedded local tokenizers (tiktoken for GPT, Anthropic's official tokenizer for Claude, approximation for Gemini) with zero API calls. Updates trigger on every keystroke, selection change, or model family switch, displaying results in VS Code's status bar with customizable template formatting using {count}, {family}, {model}, and {provider} placeholders. No external dependencies or authentication required.
Unique: Uses embedded local tokenizers (tiktoken, Anthropic official tokenizer) with zero API calls, enabling instant token counting without latency or authentication overhead. Template-based status bar customization allows developers to display token counts in custom formats without code changes.
vs alternatives: Faster and more privacy-preserving than cloud-based token counters (e.g., OpenAI Tokenizer web tool) because all processing happens locally in VS Code with no network requests; supports three major model families simultaneously with instant switching.
Renders inline visual decorations in the editor that highlight token boundaries using alternating even/odd band colors, making token segmentation visible as you edit. Color customization is provided via a dedicated UI command that opens color pickers for even/odd token bands with hex input and opacity/alpha sliders, with live preview of contrast. Highlighting can be toggled on/off via status bar palette icon or command palette, and is editor-aware (excludes Output/Debug panes).
Unique: Provides dedicated color configurator UI with live contrast preview and per-band (even/odd) color customization, enabling theme-aware token visualization without manual color code entry. Rendering is editor-aware and excludes non-text panes.
vs alternatives: More granular than simple monochrome highlighting because it uses alternating band colors to distinguish adjacent tokens visually; includes dedicated UI for color customization rather than requiring manual theme.json edits.
Allows users to switch between three pre-configured model families (GPT, Claude, Gemini) via status bar click or command palette, with automatic fallback logic for tokenizer resolution. GPT uses tiktoken with fallback chain: gpt-5 encoding → o200k_base → cl100k_base. Claude uses Anthropic's official tokenizer. Gemini uses approximation (~4 chars/token) when precise tokenizer unavailable. Model selection persists in extension state and updates all displays (status bar, highlighting) instantly.
Unique: Implements automatic fallback chains for GPT tokenizers (gpt-5 → o200k_base → cl100k_base) ensuring graceful degradation when specific model encodings are unavailable. Supports three major model families with instant switching without extension reload.
vs alternatives: Faster model comparison than using separate tools or web interfaces because switching is instant (single status bar click) and all tokenizers are embedded locally; fallback chains ensure robustness vs. hard failures.
Displays token count in VS Code's status bar using a customizable template format that supports placeholders: {count} for token count value, {family} or {model} for model family name (GPT, Claude, Gemini), and {provider} for provider identifier (openai, anthropic, gemini). Template configuration is stored in extension settings (exact mechanism unspecified). Status bar element is clickable to switch model families, and includes a palette icon to toggle highlighting.
Unique: Provides placeholder-based template formatting ({count}, {family}, {model}, {provider}) for status bar display, allowing developers to customize token count presentation without code changes. Status bar element is interactive (clickable for model switching).
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed status bar displays because template customization allows teams to match their own conventions; interactive status bar element reduces command palette usage for model switching.
Analyzes token counts for both selected text ranges and entire open documents independently. When text is selected, the extension counts only the selected range; when no selection is active, it counts the entire document. Token count updates are triggered by selection changes, typing, or model family switches. Both modes use the same underlying tokenizer (GPT, Claude, or Gemini) and display results in the status bar.
Unique: Dynamically switches between selection-based and document-wide counting based on active selection state, with real-time updates on every selection change. No explicit mode toggle required — behavior is implicit based on editor state.
vs alternatives: More intuitive than tools requiring explicit mode selection because counting mode is automatic based on selection state; enables quick comparison of token counts across prompt sections without manual toggling.
Provides IntelliSense completions ranked by a machine learning model trained on patterns from thousands of open-source repositories. The model learns which completions are most contextually relevant based on code patterns, variable names, and surrounding context, surfacing the most probable next token with a star indicator in the VS Code completion menu. This differs from simple frequency-based ranking by incorporating semantic understanding of code context.
Unique: Uses a neural model trained on open-source repository patterns to rank completions by likelihood rather than simple frequency or alphabetical ordering; the star indicator explicitly surfaces the top recommendation, making it discoverable without scrolling
vs alternatives: Faster than Copilot for single-token completions because it leverages lightweight ranking rather than full generative inference, and more transparent than generic IntelliSense because starred recommendations are explicitly marked
Ingests and learns from patterns across thousands of open-source repositories across Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Java to build a statistical model of common code patterns, API usage, and naming conventions. This model is baked into the extension and used to contextualize all completion suggestions. The learning happens offline during model training; the extension itself consumes the pre-trained model without further learning from user code.
Unique: Explicitly trained on thousands of public repositories to extract statistical patterns of idiomatic code; this training is transparent (Microsoft publishes which repos are included) and the model is frozen at extension release time, ensuring reproducibility and auditability
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary models because training data sources are disclosed; more focused on pattern matching than Copilot, which generates novel code, making it lighter-weight and faster for completion ranking
IntelliCode scores higher at 39/100 vs Live LLM Token Counter at 31/100. Live LLM Token Counter leads on ecosystem, while IntelliCode is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes the immediate code context (variable names, function signatures, imported modules, class scope) to rank completions contextually rather than globally. The model considers what symbols are in scope, what types are expected, and what the surrounding code is doing to adjust the ranking of suggestions. This is implemented by passing a window of surrounding code (typically 50-200 tokens) to the inference model along with the completion request.
Unique: Incorporates local code context (variable names, types, scope) into the ranking model rather than treating each completion request in isolation; this is done by passing a fixed-size context window to the neural model, enabling scope-aware ranking without full semantic analysis
vs alternatives: More accurate than frequency-based ranking because it considers what's in scope; lighter-weight than full type inference because it uses syntactic context and learned patterns rather than building a complete type graph
Integrates ranked completions directly into VS Code's native IntelliSense menu by adding a star (★) indicator next to the top-ranked suggestion. This is implemented as a custom completion item provider that hooks into VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API, allowing IntelliCode to inject its ranked suggestions alongside built-in language server completions. The star is a visual affordance that makes the recommendation discoverable without requiring the user to change their completion workflow.
Unique: Uses VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API to inject ranked suggestions directly into the native IntelliSense menu with a star indicator, avoiding the need for a separate UI panel or modal and keeping the completion workflow unchanged
vs alternatives: More seamless than Copilot's separate suggestion panel because it integrates into the existing IntelliSense menu; more discoverable than silent ranking because the star makes the recommendation explicit
Maintains separate, language-specific neural models trained on repositories in each supported language (Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Java). Each model is optimized for the syntax, idioms, and common patterns of its language. The extension detects the file language and routes completion requests to the appropriate model. This allows for more accurate recommendations than a single multi-language model because each model learns language-specific patterns.
Unique: Trains and deploys separate neural models per language rather than a single multi-language model, allowing each model to specialize in language-specific syntax, idioms, and conventions; this is more complex to maintain but produces more accurate recommendations than a generalist approach
vs alternatives: More accurate than single-model approaches like Copilot's base model because each language model is optimized for its domain; more maintainable than rule-based systems because patterns are learned rather than hand-coded
Executes the completion ranking model on Microsoft's servers rather than locally on the user's machine. When a completion request is triggered, the extension sends the code context and cursor position to Microsoft's inference service, which runs the model and returns ranked suggestions. This approach allows for larger, more sophisticated models than would be practical to ship with the extension, and enables model updates without requiring users to download new extension versions.
Unique: Offloads model inference to Microsoft's cloud infrastructure rather than running locally, enabling larger models and automatic updates but requiring internet connectivity and accepting privacy tradeoffs of sending code context to external servers
vs alternatives: More sophisticated models than local approaches because server-side inference can use larger, slower models; more convenient than self-hosted solutions because no infrastructure setup is required, but less private than local-only alternatives
Learns and recommends common API and library usage patterns from open-source repositories. When a developer starts typing a method call or API usage, the model ranks suggestions based on how that API is typically used in the training data. For example, if a developer types `requests.get(`, the model will rank common parameters like `url=` and `timeout=` based on frequency in the training corpus. This is implemented by training the model on API call sequences and parameter patterns extracted from the training repositories.
Unique: Extracts and learns API usage patterns (parameter names, method chains, common argument values) from open-source repositories, allowing the model to recommend not just what methods exist but how they are typically used in practice
vs alternatives: More practical than static documentation because it shows real-world usage patterns; more accurate than generic completion because it ranks by actual usage frequency in the training data