| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $3.00e-8 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes inference using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture where only 2B of 24B total parameters are active per forward pass, reducing computational cost and latency through sparse gating mechanisms. The model routes input tokens to specialized expert subnetworks based on learned routing weights, enabling efficient deployment on resource-constrained devices while maintaining quality comparable to dense models. This hybrid architecture balances model capacity with inference efficiency through selective expert activation rather than full parameter computation.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B implements a hybrid MoE architecture with only 2B active parameters per token, achieving 8x parameter efficiency compared to dense 24B models while maintaining reasoning quality through specialized expert routing. This design specifically targets on-device deployment where memory bandwidth and compute are bottlenecks, using learned gating to dynamically select relevant experts rather than static pruning.
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense 24B models (Llama 2 24B, Mistral 24B) with lower latency and memory footprint, while maintaining competitive quality through expert specialization; more capable than 7B dense models due to larger total parameter capacity despite sparse activation.
Maintains coherent dialogue across multiple turns by processing conversation history as context, enabling the model to track entities, maintain conversational state, and reason about prior exchanges. The model uses standard transformer attention mechanisms to weight relevant historical context, allowing it to reference earlier statements, correct misunderstandings, and build on previous reasoning chains. This capability supports both stateless API calls (where full history is passed each turn) and stateful conversation management patterns.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B achieves multi-turn reasoning with sparse MoE activation, routing conversation context tokens through specialized experts for dialogue understanding. This allows efficient processing of long conversation histories compared to dense models, as only relevant expert pathways activate for context integration rather than full parameter computation.
vs alternatives: More efficient multi-turn processing than dense 24B models due to sparse activation, enabling longer conversation histories within the same latency budget; comparable dialogue quality to larger dense models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters.
Generates and completes code across multiple programming languages by predicting syntactically and semantically valid continuations of code snippets. The model uses transformer attention to understand code structure, variable scope, and API patterns from context, enabling both single-line completions and multi-function generation. Supports both inline completion (filling gaps in existing code) and full-function generation from docstrings or type signatures.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B generates code using sparse MoE routing, where language-specific experts activate based on detected programming language, enabling efficient multi-language support without full parameter activation per language. This architecture allows the model to maintain specialized code generation quality across 10+ languages while using only 2B active parameters.
vs alternatives: More efficient code generation than dense 24B models with lower latency per completion, while maintaining quality competitive with larger models (Codex, GPT-4) for common languages; better multi-language support than single-language-optimized models due to expert specialization.
Interprets natural language instructions and decomposes complex tasks into subtasks or step-by-step execution plans. The model uses attention mechanisms to identify task constraints, dependencies, and success criteria from instruction text, then generates structured plans or reasoning traces. Supports both implicit task decomposition (reasoning internally) and explicit plan generation (outputting step-by-step instructions for external execution).
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B performs task decomposition using sparse expert routing where planning-specific experts activate for instruction parsing and subtask generation. This enables efficient reasoning without full parameter activation, allowing the model to handle complex multi-step tasks within latency budgets suitable for interactive systems.
vs alternatives: More efficient task decomposition than dense 24B models with lower latency for real-time planning; comparable reasoning quality to larger models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters, making it suitable for cost-sensitive agent deployments.
Generates text informed by provided context or knowledge documents, using attention mechanisms to ground responses in supplied information rather than relying solely on training data. The model integrates context passages into the attention computation, allowing it to cite sources, synthesize information from multiple documents, and reduce hallucination by constraining generation to supported facts. This capability is commonly used in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines where external knowledge is injected into the prompt.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B grounds text generation using sparse MoE routing where knowledge-integration experts activate when context documents are present, enabling efficient RAG without full parameter computation. This allows the model to handle large context windows (with external retrieval) while maintaining low latency compared to dense models.
vs alternatives: More efficient knowledge grounding than dense 24B models, enabling longer context windows within latency budgets; comparable RAG quality to larger models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters, reducing API costs for knowledge-grounded applications.
Provides real-time text generation through streaming API endpoints, where tokens are emitted incrementally as they are generated rather than waiting for full response completion. The model uses token-by-token generation with streaming protocols (e.g., Server-Sent Events, WebSocket) to enable low-latency user feedback and progressive response rendering. Supports both buffered (full response at once) and streaming (incremental token) output modes.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B streaming inference via OpenRouter uses sparse MoE token generation, where each token activates only relevant experts, reducing per-token latency compared to dense models. This enables faster streaming output and lower time-to-first-token (TTFT) for interactive applications.
vs alternatives: Faster token generation than dense 24B models due to sparse activation, enabling more responsive streaming UX; comparable streaming quality to larger models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters, reducing infrastructure costs for streaming applications.
Generates text constrained to specific formats or schemas (e.g., JSON, XML, CSV, function calls) by using prompt engineering, output validation, or constrained decoding techniques. The model learns to follow format specifications from examples or explicit instructions, enabling reliable extraction of structured data from unstructured prompts. Supports both soft constraints (instructions in prompt) and hard constraints (validation/filtering of generated tokens).
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B generates structured output using sparse MoE routing where format-specific experts activate based on detected output schema, enabling efficient multi-format support without full parameter activation. This allows the model to maintain format consistency across diverse output types while using only 2B active parameters.
vs alternatives: More efficient structured generation than dense 24B models with lower latency for format-constrained tasks; comparable format adherence to larger models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters, reducing costs for data extraction and function-calling applications.
Generates and translates text across multiple languages by routing language-specific tokens through specialized expert pathways in the MoE architecture. The model learns language-specific patterns and vocabulary during training, enabling both translation (source-to-target language conversion) and code-switching (mixing languages in single response). Supports both explicit translation prompts and implicit multilingual generation based on input language.
Unique: LFM2-24B-A2B implements cross-lingual generation using language-specific MoE experts that activate based on detected input/output language, enabling efficient multilingual support without full parameter activation per language. This architecture allows the model to maintain translation quality across 50+ languages while using only 2B active parameters.
vs alternatives: More efficient multilingual generation than dense 24B models with lower latency for translation tasks; comparable translation quality to larger models (70B+) while using 1/3 the active parameters, reducing costs for multilingual applications and enabling broader language coverage than single-language-optimized models.
+1 more capabilities
GLM-4.5 uses a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically route tokens through specialized expert networks based on input characteristics, enabling efficient processing of 128k-token contexts without proportional latency increases. The MoE design allows selective expert activation per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth across extended conversations and multi-document analysis tasks typical of agent-based workflows.
Unique: Mixture-of-Experts routing specifically tuned for agent workloads rather than generic dense models; expert activation patterns are optimized for tool-use sequences and multi-step reasoning rather than general language tasks
vs alternatives: Outperforms dense models like GPT-4 Turbo on agent tasks within 128k context by routing computational budget to relevant experts, reducing latency and cost vs. models that process all tokens through identical layers
GLM-4.5 implements native function calling through a schema-based registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameter constraints, type validation, and description metadata. The model learns to emit structured tool invocations that map directly to function signatures, enabling deterministic tool orchestration without post-processing or regex parsing. Integration with OpenRouter's API exposes this via standard function-calling parameters compatible with OpenAI's format.
Unique: Schema-based function calling is trained directly into the model weights rather than implemented as post-hoc decoding constraints, allowing the model to learn semantic relationships between tool purposes and input context during training
vs alternatives: More reliable than constraint-based function calling (e.g., Guidance, LMQL) because tool selection is learned rather than enforced, reducing parsing failures and enabling the model to reason about tool applicability
Z.ai: GLM 4.5 scores higher at 24/100 vs LiquidAI: LFM2-24B-A2B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-4.5 can be used for batch inference through OpenRouter's API, enabling cost-optimized processing of large numbers of requests. Batch processing typically offers reduced pricing compared to real-time API calls and is suitable for non-urgent inference tasks. The model can process batches of prompts efficiently, with results returned after processing completes. This is valuable for agents running scheduled tasks or processing large datasets.
Unique: Batch processing is offered through OpenRouter's unified API rather than a separate batch service, enabling seamless switching between real-time and batch modes with the same client code
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than real-time API for high-volume inference; simpler than managing separate batch infrastructure because OpenRouter handles queuing and result delivery
GLM-4.5 maintains coherent conversation state across turns by encoding prior messages into a compressed representation that persists within the 128k context window. The model uses attention mechanisms to selectively retrieve relevant prior context, enabling agents to reference earlier decisions, tool results, and user preferences without explicit memory management. This is particularly effective for agent workflows where state accumulation (e.g., task progress, discovered facts) must inform subsequent actions.
Unique: Implicit memory management through attention-based context selection rather than explicit memory modules; the model learns which prior turns are relevant without separate retrieval or summarization steps
vs alternatives: More efficient than explicit memory systems (e.g., LangChain's ConversationBufferMemory) because attention is computed once during inference rather than requiring separate retrieval and summarization passes
GLM-4.5 generates code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging training data that includes diverse codebases and syntax patterns. The model understands language-specific idioms, library conventions, and structural patterns (e.g., async/await in JavaScript, type hints in Python, generics in Java) without explicit language-specific modules. Generation is context-aware, respecting indentation, existing code style, and project conventions when completing or extending code snippets.
Unique: Language-agnostic code generation trained on diverse codebases rather than language-specific fine-tuning; the model generalizes syntax patterns across languages, enabling reasonable code generation even for less common languages
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than specialized models like Codex (which emphasizes Python/JavaScript) but lower quality on niche languages compared to language-specific models; better for polyglot teams than single-language specialists
GLM-4.5 is trained on extensive technical documentation, API references, and code examples, enabling it to understand and reason about complex technical concepts, library APIs, and system architectures. The model can parse API schemas (OpenAPI, GraphQL, Protocol Buffers), understand parameter constraints and type systems, and generate code that correctly uses APIs based on documentation. This is particularly valuable for agent workflows that must interact with external systems.
Unique: Semantic understanding of API schemas and documentation is learned from training data rather than implemented as a separate schema parser; the model reasons about API semantics holistically
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-generation-only models because it understands API semantics and can reason about correctness; better than generic LLMs for technical tasks because training includes extensive API documentation
GLM-4.5 can generate responses that explicitly show reasoning steps, enabling transparency into how conclusions were reached. When prompted with chain-of-thought patterns, the model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, making it suitable for applications requiring explainability or verification. This is implemented through training on reasoning-annotated data and prompt patterns that encourage step-by-step decomposition.
Unique: Chain-of-thought reasoning is trained directly into the model rather than implemented as a decoding strategy; the model learns to generate reasoning steps as part of its core training objective
vs alternatives: More natural and coherent reasoning steps than prompt-injection approaches (e.g., appending 'think step by step') because reasoning is learned as a first-class capability
GLM-4.5 supports multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) with training that enables cross-lingual reasoning — understanding concepts expressed in one language and reasoning about them in another. The model can translate, summarize, and reason across languages without language-specific degradation. This is particularly valuable for global applications and agents that must operate in multilingual environments.
Unique: Cross-lingual reasoning is learned from multilingual training data rather than implemented as separate language-specific models; the model develops a shared representation across languages
vs alternatives: More efficient than maintaining separate models per language because a single model handles all languages; better for cross-lingual reasoning than language-specific models because the shared representation enables concept transfer
+3 more capabilities